한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제28권1호
  • /
  • Pages.63-70
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지

돼지 장기이식에서 급성거부반응 연구에 효과적인 엉덩오목이식 동물모델: 줄기세포유래 Humanized 조직의 안전성 평가모델

The Iliac Fossa Transplant as an Acute Rejection Model in Porcine Kidney Transplantation: a Tool for the Safety Study of the Stem Cell- induced Humanized Tissue

  • 곽호현 (강원대학교 수의과대학, 강원대학교 줄기세포 연구소) ;
  • 남현숙 (강원대학교 수의과대학, 강원대학교 줄기세포 연구소) ;
  • 우흥명 (강원대학교 수의과대학, 강원대학교 줄기세포 연구소)
  • Kwak, Ho-Hyun (College of Veterinary Medicine and KNU Stem Cell Institute, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Nam, Hyun-Suk (College of Veterinary Medicine and KNU Stem Cell Institute, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Woo, Heung-Myong (College of Veterinary Medicine and KNU Stem Cell Institute, Kangwon National University)
  • 심사 : 2011.02.15
  • 발행 : 2011.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

To consider the iliac fossa as the vascular anastomosis site of kidney transplantation for the short-term study of acute rejection in pigs. Twelve domestic pigs weighing 39~48 kg underwent heterotopic renal allgraft transplantation. The experimental animals were divided into 2 groups in terms of renal vascular anastomosis site; the external iliac artery and vein were used in iliac fossa model (n = 6), the abdominal aorta and the caudal vena cava inferior to the kidney were used in abdominal cavity model (n = 6). Renal function was evaluated by daily measurement of plasma creatinine and BUN concentrations. The experiments' health including postoperative complications was also assessed daily for 8 days after transplantation. After euthanazation gross and histopathologic analysis was performed. All six pigs in iliac fossa model developed neuropraxia and lameness of the ipsilateral pelvic limb. However, no necrosis was observed in any pigs. In the abdominal cavity model, durations of both the surgical operation and the vascular anastomosis were significantly longer than those in the iliac fossa model. Furthermore, ischemia injury of the transplanted kidney was increased in abdominal cavity model, which induced accelerated-acute immune response from day 4 after transplantation. Despite of pelvic limb complication, the iliac fossa model showed more advantages including not only less ischemia time related to easy vascular anastomosis, but also less immune response during the acute rejection period. The results indicate that the iliac fossa model may be appropriate to the study of acute rejection in porcine kidney transplantation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Burgos FJ, Pascual J, Briones G. Cuevas B, Villafruela J, Correa C, Marcen R, Gomez V. Influence of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in ischemia reperfusion syndrome and renal function after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 1664-1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(03)00622-5
  2. Ekser B, Rigotti P, Gridelli B, Cooper DK. Xenotransplantation of solid organs in the pig-to-primate model. Transpl Immunol 2009; 21: 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2008.10.005
  3. Gilligan BJ, Woo HM, Kosieradzki M, Torrealba JR, Southard JH, Mangino MJ. Prolonged hypothermia causes primary nonfunction in preserved canine renal allografts due to humoral rejection. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1266-1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00503.x
  4. Gregory CR, Gourley I, Taylor NJ Broaddus TW, Olds RB, Patz JD. Preliminary results of clinical renal allograft transplantation in the dog and cat. J Vet Int Med 1987; 1:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1987.tb01987.x
  5. Gregory CR, Kyles AE, Bernsteen L. Results of clinical renal transplantation in 15 dogs using triple drug immuno suppressive therapy. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00121.x
  6. Griesemer AD, Hirakata A, Shimizu A, Moran S, Tena A, Iwaki H, Ishikawa Y, Schule P, Arn JS, Robson SC, Fishman JA, Sykes M, Sachs DH, Yamada K. Results of Gal-Knockout Porcine Thymokidney Xenografts. Am J Transplant 2009; 88: 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a9ed5b
  7. Hoy T, Garmer S, Shenton BK, Bell AE, Lowdell MW, Farrant J, North M, Sewell C. Futher clinical applications In Flow cytometry. In: Flow cytometry, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000: 99-124.
  8. Jones JW. A new anastomotic technique in renal transplants reduces warm ischemia time. Clin Transplant 1998; 12: 70-72.
  9. Jurgen T, Manfred N, Stefan S, Julia H, Karl-Heinz W, Christoph EB, Andreas P. Decreasing surgical complications in porcine kidney autotransplantation by a new technique of implantation. J Exp Anim Sci 2007; 43: 231-236 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeas.2006.09.005
  10. Kwak HH, Kang HS, Nam HS, Woo HM. Evaluation of Immune Responses after Nuclear DNA - matched Renal Transplantation in Cloned Miniature Pigs. J Vet Clin 2010; 27(Suppl): 318.
  11. Park KM, Nam HS, Byeon AR, Park SM, Woo JS, Bonventre JV, Woo HM. Multi Organ Decellularization, The Maryland Stem Cell Research 2010; 21: 31.
  12. Lai L, Prather RS. Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. Cloning Stem Cells 2003; 5: 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623003772032754
  13. Mangino MJ, Ametani MS, Gilligan BJ, Szabo C, Brounts L, Southard JH. Role of peroxy nitrite anion in renal hypothermic preservation injury. Transplantation 2005; 27: 1455-1460.
  14. Martin MJ, Yin D, Adams C, Houtz J, Shen J, Chong AS. Skin graft survival in genetically identical Cloned pigs. Cloning Stem Cells. 2003; 5: 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623003322234713
  15. Nam HS, McAnulty JF, Kwak HH, Yoon BI, Hyun C, Kim WH, Woo HM. Gingival overgrowth in dogs associated with clinically relevant cyclosporine blood levels: observations in a canine renal transplantation model. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 247-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00373.x
  16. Nam SN, Woo JS, Woo HM. Acute kidney injury models: focus on the therapeutic effects of stem cell in preclinical approach. J Vet Clin 2010; 27: 533-539.
  17. Nerstrom B, GyrdHansen H, IversenHansen R, Lokkegaard H. Renal auto transplantation in the pig: surgical aspects. Scand. J Urol Nephrol 1972; 6: 151-153. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365597209133628
  18. Nicholson ML, Hosgood S A, Metcalfe MS, Waller JR, Brook NR. A comparison of renal preservation by cold storage and machine perfusion using a porcine autotransplant model. Transplantation 2004; 78: 333-337.
  19. Ogura K, Terasaki PI, Johnson C. Mendez R, Rosenthal JT, Ettenger R, Martin DC, Dainko E, Cohen L, Mackett T. The significance of a positive flow cytometry test in primary kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 56: 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199308000-00007
  20. Robert AB, Darzynkiewicz Z, Robinson JP. Flow Cytometry Crossmatching for solid organ transplantation. Method in cell biology 1994; 4: 437-447.
  21. Stegall MD, Gloor J, Winters JL, Moore SB, Degoey S. A comparison of plasmapheresis versus high dose IvIg desensitization in renal allograft recipients with high levels of donor specific alloantibody. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01178.x
  22. Theoret CL, Dore M, Mulon PY, Desrochers A, Viramontes F, Filion F, Smith LC. Short- and long-term skin graft survival in cattle clones with different mitochondrial haplotypes. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 1465-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.019
  23. Wamser P, Asari R, Goetzinger P. Mayer G, Berlakovich G, Soliman T, Muehlbacher F, Steininger R. Detrimental effects of controlled reperfusion on renal function after porcine autotransplantation are fully compensated by the use of Carolina rinse solution. Transplant Int 2003; 16: 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00285.x
  24. Yamada K, Shimizu A, Utsugi R. Ierino FL, Gargollo P, Haller GW, Colvin RB, Sachs DH. Thymic transplantation in miniature swine. II. Induction of tolerance by transplantation of composite thymokidneys to thymectomized recipients. J Immunol 2000; 164: 3079-3086.
  25. Zhang Z, Schlachta C, Duff J. Improved techniques for kidney transplantation in mice. Microsurgery 1995; 16: 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920160212