DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Dietary Energy and Protein Levels on Productivity and Feed Cost in Crossbred Chicks at Different Growth Stages

사육단계별 에너지 및 단백질 함량이 유색육용계의 생산능력과 사료비용에 미치는 영향

  • Jeong, Yong-Dae (Department of Animal Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Youn, Myoung-Ja (Department of Animal Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Na, Jae-Cheon (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, R. D. A.) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Cheol (Poultry Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, R. D. A.) ;
  • Ryu, Kyeong-Seon (Department of Animal Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 정용대 (전북대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 윤명자 (전북대학교 동물소재공학과) ;
  • 나재천 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 최희철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 류경선 (전북대학교 동물소재공학과)
  • Received : 2010.09.27
  • Accepted : 2011.02.18
  • Published : 2011.04.30

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary energy and protein levels on productivity and feed cost in crossbred chicks. Experiment was divided into starting (0~5 weeks), growing (6~10 weeks), and finishing (11~14 weeks) periods. Design of feeding trials was 3 ${\times}$ 3 factorial to feed different energy and protein levels for starting (ME 2,950, 3,000, and 3,050 kcal/kg CP 18, 19, and 20%), growing (ME 3,000, 3,050, and 3,100 kcal/kg CP 17, 18, and 19%) and finishing (ME 3,050, 3,100, and 3,150 kcal/kg CP 16, 17, and 18%) periods, respectively. In the starting period, weight gain and FCR was improved by dietary protein level (P<0.05). Interaction effect existed in feed intake and FCR (P<0.05). Weight gain was higher in 3,000 kcal/kg ME treatment than 3,100 kcal/kg ME treatment for growing period (P<0.05). In finishing period, feed intake was significantly decreased in ME 3,150 kcal/kg treatment than the other ME treatments (P<0.05). Feed cost/weight gain (FC/WG) was significantly decreased in chicks fed with 2,950 kcal/kg ME and 19% CP in starting period (P<0.05). For the growing period, FC/WG was notably increased in ME 3,000, 3,050 kcal/kg treatment than ME 3,100 kcal/kg treatment, and the FC/WG of CP 17, 18% treatment was significantly higher than CP 16% treatment (P<0.05). Thus, the optimum levels of ME and CP to improve the productivity and feed cost for starting, growing and finishing periods were 2,950 kcal/kg ME, 19% CP 3,000 kcal/kg ME, 18% CP and 3,100 kcal/kg ME, 17 or 16% CP, respectively.

유색육용계의 사육 기간별 사료내 대사에너지와 조단백질수준을 구명하고자 본 연구를 수행하였다. 사양시험은 사육 전기(0~5주), 중기(6~10), 후기(11~14주)로 나누어 실시하였다. 실험설계는 $3{\times}3$ 요인시험으로 시험사료의 대사에너지와 조단백질은 각각 사육전기에 2,950, 3,000, 3,050 kcal/kg, 18, 19, 20%, 중기에 3,000, 3,050, 3,100 kcal/kg, 17, 18, 19%, 후기에 3,050, 3,100, 3,150 kcal/kg, 16, 17, 18% 수준으로 급여하였다. 사육 전기에 사료 ME 수준에 따른 증체량, 사료섭취량, 사료요구율은 처리구간 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않으나 사료비용은 ME 3,050 kcal/kg 처리구에서 유의적으로 높으며 증체량 대비 사료비용(feed cost/weight gain, FC/WG)은 ME 수준이 낮을수록 감소하였다(P<0.05). 그리고 CP 함량에 따른 증체량, 사료요구율은 19, 20% 처리구가 CP 18% 처리구보다 개선되었고 FC/WG는 CP 19% 처리구에서 다른 처리구에 비해 유의적으로 감소하였다(P<0.05). ME 및 CP간 상호작용은 사료섭취량과 사료요구율에서 존재하며 (P<0.05) 증체량은 나타내지 않았다. 사육 중기에 증체량, 사료섭취량은 ME 3,000 kcal/kg 처리구에서 ME 3,100 kcal/kg 처리구보다 증가하였고(P<0.05), 사료요구율은 ME 처리구간 차이가 없었다. 이 시기에 사료내 단백질 수준의 차이가 처리구간에 미치는 영향은 없었으며, CP와 ME 수준간 상호작용은 없었다. 그리고 사료비용은 처리구간 차이가 없으나 FC/WG는 ME 3,000, 3,050 kcal/kg 처리구에서 ME 3,100 kcal/kg 처리구보다 감소하였다(P<0.05). 사육 후기에서 사료의 CP 함량 차이가 증체량, 사료섭취량, 사료요구율에 영향은 미치지 않으나 에너지 수준 차이에 따라서 사료섭취량은 ME 3,150 kcal/kg 처리구에서 ME 3,050, 3,100 kcal/kg 처리구보다 감소되었다(P<0.05). 사료비용은 CP 16% 처리구에서 CP 18% 처리구보다 낮았고(P<0.05) FC/WG는 CP 16, 17% 처리구에서 CP 18% 처리구에 비하여 낮았다(P<0.05). 따라서, 유색육용계의 생산성 개선을 위한 사육단계별 사료내 적정 단백질 및 에너지수준은 전기, 중기, 후기에 각각 2,950 kcal/kg, 19%; 3,000 kcal/kg, 18%; 3,100 kcal/kg, 16 또는 17%로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Albuquerque, R., Faria, D. E., Junqueira, O. M., Salvador, D., FariaF. D. E. and Rizzo, M. F. 2003. Effects of energy levels in finisher diets and slaughter age of on performance and carcass yield in broiler chickens. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci. 5(2):99-104.
  2. Boa-Amponsem, K., Dunnington, E. A. and Siegel, P. B. 1991. Genotype, feeding regimen, and diet interactions in meat chickens. 1. Growth, organ size, and feed utilizati on. Poult. Sci. 70:680-688. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0700680
  3. Choi, S. Y. and Francom, M. 2009. Korea-republic of poultry and products annual. USDA FAS. KS9040.
  4. Ghazanfari, S., Kermanshahi, H., Nassiry, M. R., Golian, A., Moussavi, A. R. H. and Salehi, A. 2010. Effect of feed restriction and different energy and protein levels of the diet on growth performance and growth hormone in broiler chickens. J. Biol. Sci. 10(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2010.25.30
  5. Han, S. W., Park, C. S., Ohh, B. K., Chung, S. B., Lee, K. H.,Choi, Y. H., Kim, J. H., Yeo, J. S. and Ha, J. K. 1995. A research on current farm management and marketing situation of Korean native chickens. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 22(3):167-178.
  6. Holsheimer, J. P. and Veerkamp, C. H. 1992. Effects of dietary energy, protein and lysine content on performance and yield of two strains of male broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 71:872-879. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710872
  7. Hulan, H. W., Proudfoot, F. G., Ramey, D. and McRae, K. B. 1980.Influence of genotype and diet on general performance and incidence of leg abnormalities of commercial broilers reared to roaster weight. Poult. Sci. 59:748-757. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590748
  8. Jackson, S., Summers, J. D. and Leeson, S. 1982a. Effect of dietary protein and energy on broiler carcass composition and efficiency of nutrient utilization. Poult. Sci. 61:2224-2231. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0612224
  9. Jackson, S., Summers, J. D. and Leeson, S. 1982b. Effect of dietary protein and energy on broiler performance and production costs. Poult. Sci. 61:2232-2240. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0612232
  10. Jeong, Y. D., Jeon, B. S. and Ryu, K. S. 2009. Effect of various organic dietary ME and CP on performance, blood composition and meat quality in meat type cross-bred chicks. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 36(2):139-147. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.139
  11. Jeong, Y. D. and Ryu, K. S. 2008. Effect of dietary energy, protein on growth and blood composition of cross bred chicks. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 35(3):291-302. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2008.35.3.291
  12. KFS. 2007. Korean feeding standard: nutrition requirement of broiler. RDA Press, Suwon, Korea. p 28-32.
  13. Lee, H. S., Kang, B. S., Na, J. C. and Ryu, K. S. 2008. Effects of dietary energy, protein on growth and blood composition in cross-bred with Korean native chicks. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 35(4):399-405. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.35.4.399
  14. Malheiros, R. D., Moraes, M. B., Collin, A., Janssens, P. J., Decuypere, E. and Buyse, J. 2003. Dietary macronutrients, endocrine functioning and intermediary metabolism in broiler chickens: pair wise substitutions between protein, fat and carbohydrate. Nutr. Res. 23(4):567-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00022-8
  15. Malone, G. W., Chaloupka, G. W., Merkley, J. W. and Littlefield, L. H. 1979. Evaluation of five commercial broiler crosses. 1. Growout performance. Poult. Sci. 58:509-515. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0580509
  16. Morris, T. R. and Njuru, D. M. 1990. Protein requirement of fastand slow growing chicks. Br. Poult. Sci 1:803-809.
  17. Na, J. C., Park, S. B., Bang, H. T., Kang, H. K., Kim, M. J., Choi,H. C., Seo, O. S., Ryu, K. S., Jang, H. K. and Choi, J. T. 2009. Effects of protein and energy levels on performance and carcass rate in cross bred chicks. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 36(1):23-28. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.1.023
  18. Nahashon, S. N., Adefope, N., Amenyenu, A. and Wright, D. 2005.Effects of dietary metabolizable and crude protein concentrations growth performance and carcass characteristics of French guinea broilers. Poult. Sci. 84:337-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.337
  19. Nguyen, T. V. and Bunchasak, C. 2005. Effects of dietary protein and energy on growth performance and carcass characteristics of betong chicken at early growth stage. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 27(6):1171-1178.
  20. NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  21. Proudfoot, F. G. and Hulan, H. W. 1978. The interrelated effects of feeding diet combinations with different protein and energy levels to males and females of commercial genotypes. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58:391-398. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas78-051
  22. Quentin, M., Bouvarel, I., Berri, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E., Baeza, E.,Jego, Y. and Picard, M. 2003. Growth, carcass composition and meat quality response to dietary concentrations in fast, mediumand slow growing commercial broilers. Anim. Res. 52:65-77. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2003005
  23. Reginatto, M. F., Ribeiro, A. M. and Penz, A. M. 2000. Effect of energy, energy:protein ratio and growing phase on the performance and carcass composition of broilers. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2 (3):229-237. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2000000300005
  24. Renden, J. A., Bilgili, S. F. and Kincaid, S. A. 1992. Effects ofphotoschedule and strain cross on broiler performance andcarcass yield. Poult. Sci. 71:1417-1426. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711417
  25. Rosebrough, R. W. and McMurtry, J. P. 1993. Protein and energy relationship in the broiler chicken. 11. Effects of protein quantity and quality on metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 70:667-678. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19930162
  26. Scanes, C. G., Griminger, P. and Bounson, F. C. 1981. Effect of dietary protein restrictions on circulating concentrations of growth hormone in growing domestic fowls (Gallus domesticus). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 168(3):334-337. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-168-41282
  27. Sengar, S. S. 1987. Feed intake and growth rate pattern in White Leghorn chicks maintained on different planes of nutrition. Poult. Advisor 20:23-27.
  28. Smith, E. R. and Pesti, G. M. 1998. Influence of broiler strain cross and dietary protein on the performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 77:276-281. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.2.276
  29. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principle and procedures of statistics. 2nd Edn McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc. New York.
  30. Tooci, S., Shivazad, M., Eila, N. and Zarei, A. 2009. Effect of dietary dilution of energy and nutrients during different growing periods on compensatory growth of Ross broilers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8(22):6470-6475. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.774