Recognition Saves a Space where Invisible, Inaudible, and Unwritable - Another Reason for Geography as Humanities -

인정, 보이지 않고, 들리지 않고, 쓰여지지 않은 공간을 발견하다: 지리학이 인문학인 또 다른 이유

  • Park, Seung-Kyu (Department of Social Studies Education, Chuncheon National University of Education)
  • 박승규 (춘천교육대학교 사회과교육과)
  • Received : 2011.12.08
  • Accepted : 2011.12.23
  • Published : 2011.12.31

Abstract

The present paper discusses the relationship between human being and space through 'recognition.' Recognition is the natural desire of human being. Every human being wants to be recognized for what they do in everywhere. Human being enhances their own identity and fight for the raison d'etre to be recognized by others. Hegel's recognition is grounded by a process of mutual recognition based on the subject-object view of human beings. On the other hand, the recognition based on inter-subjectivity is founded by the view of human beings emphasizing "we" on the basis of the relationship between you and I. These two meanings of recognition make it possible to newly recognize the relationship between human beings and space. In the paper, I emphasize the role of geography about the invisible space over the geographical recognition regarding the visible space dealing in previously geography. I expect to be recovered the nature of geography by revealing the invisible space. Also, the geographical discovery is presented about two spaces including inaudible space and unwritable space but having story via '$\acute{e}$criture blanche.' In terms of the discovery, I criticize irrationalities and discrepancies of our society and suggest ways of solving problems. The goal of the discussion is to support the overcoming of the immediate geography crisis as well as communicate with the world as humanity.

이 논문은 '인정(recognition)'을 통해 인간과 공간의 관계에 대해 살펴보았다. 인정은 인간의 근원적 욕구이다. 인간은 누구든지 어디서나 인정받으려 한다. 자신의 정체성을 강화하고, 자신의 존재이유를 확인받기 위해 인정투쟁을 벌인다. 헤겔이 제시한 '인정'은 주체-객체의 인간관에 근거한 상호인정 과정에 근거한다. 반면에, 서로 주체성을 토대로 하는'인정'은 나와 너의 관계를 토대로'우리'를 강조하는 인간관에 근거한다. '인정'은 인간과 공간의 관계에 대한 새로운 인식을 가능하게 한다. 지금까지 지리학에서 다루었던 보이는 공간에 대한 지리적 인식을 넘어, 보이지 않는 공간에 대한 지리학의 역할을 채근한다. 보이지 않는 공간을 보이게 하는 과정을 통해 지리학의 본질을 회복하는데 기여한다. 목소리가 들리지 않는 공간과 이야기가 쓰여지지 않는 공간에 담겨있는 지리적 의미를 발견하도록 돕는다. 이를 통해 우리 사회의 모순과 부조리한 모습을 고발하고, 본질적으로 문제를 해결할 수 있는 방법을 제시한다. 이같은 논의의 궁극적 목적은 지리학이 당면한 위기를 극복하고, 인문학으로서 세상과 소통하기 위한 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. M. (translation), 2009 Zur Kritik der Kategorie der Anerkennung(Dialectics of Recognition: eng. ver.), proceedings of relocating the other:cultural politics of alterity, Ewha Hk International Conference, 423-432 (in korean).
  2. Anderson, J. (translation), 1995, The struggle for recogniton:the moral grammar of social conflicts, The Mit press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
  3. Choi, B. D., 2009, Multi-cultural space and glocal ethics:from cultural space of transnational captalism to space of recognition struggle, Journal of the korean association of regional geographers, 15(5), 635-654(in korean).
  4. Choi, B. D., 2010, Critical Ecology and Environmental Justice, Hanul, Seoul(최병두, 2010, 비판적 생태학과 환경정의, 한울, 서울)
  5. Choi, B. D., Lim, S. H., Ahn, Y. G. and Park, B. G., 2011, Glocalization and Multicultural Space, purungil, seoul(최병두.임석회.안영진.박배균, 2011, 지구, 지방화와 다문화 공간, 푸른길, 서울).
  6. Knag, J. H. (translation), 2010, For Humanists, sakyejul, paju(강주헌 역, 2010, 휴머니스트를 위하여:경계를 넘어서 세계지성 27인과의 대화, 사계절, 파주; Constantin von Barloewen, 2007, Le Livre des Savoirs:Conversations avec les Grands Esprits de Notre Temps, Grasset & Fasquelle).
  7. Kim, D. H., 2009, Asymmetric Structure of Recognition, Community and Religion:in Hegel's Political
  8. Philosophy, Study of Political Thoughts, 15(1), 158-243(in korean).
  9. Kim, H. Y., (translation), 2000, La vie mode d'emploi, bookworld, seoul(김호영 역, 2000, 인생사용법, 책세상, 서울; Perec, G., 1978, La vie mode d'emploi, hachette, paris).
  10. Kim, S. B., 2008, The Ideology of I-You Identity, Ghill, paju(김상봉, 2008, 서로주체성의 이념, 한길사, 파주).
  11. Kim, W. C. and M, K. H., 2005, The three circles, Hangilsa, paju(김우창.문광훈, 2005, 세 개의 동그라미: 마음, 이데아, 지각, 한길사, 파주).
  12. Moon, S. H. (translation), 2001, Interview with Axel Honneth, Journal of Korean Association for studies of philosophical thoughts 2, 194-212 (in korean).
  13. Lee, C. N., 2010, Haussmann and the Landscape of the Modern City of Paris, Culture and Society, 8, 7-38 (in korean).
  14. Lee, H. J., 2005, Feministische Identitat und Anerkennungstheorie—H Eine Feministische Rekonstruktion der Hegelschen Dialektik, Journal of Korean Association for studies of philosophical thoughts, 63-84 (in korean).
  15. Lee, H. K., 2007, Le citta invisibili, Minumsa, seoul(이현경 역, 보이지 않는 도시들, 민음사, 서울).
  16. Lee, J. E., 2011, Nine keyword for human understanding, Dongnyok, paju(한국철학사상연구회, 2011, 인간을 이해하는 아홉가지 단어, 동녘, 파주).
  17. Moon, S. H. and Lee, H. J. (translation), 2011, Kampf um anerkennung, aprilbooks, seoul(문성훈, 이현재 역, 인정투쟁, 사월의 책, 서울; Honneth, A., 1992, Kampf Um Anerkennung, Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main).
  18. Ma, S. Y., 2008, England Landscape and Landscape theory in the time of Industrial Revolution: Turner's Landscape pictures, Human.Environment.Future, 1(1), 197-220 (in korean).
  19. Markell, Patchen, 2003, Bound by Recognition, Princeton Univ. Press.
  20. Nam, Y. W., 2010, Is This Crisis or an Opportunity?: A Consideration about Current Issues on Geography and Geography Education, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 45(6), 691-697 (in korean).
  21. Han, J. S., 2007, Merleau-Pontys Paul Klee:Malerei macht das Unsichtbare sichtbar, A Study of philosophy and phenomenology, 35, 49-79 (in korean).
  22. Kang, S. J., 2010, Enjoyment of philosophical poetry reading, Dongnyok, paju(강신주, 2010, 철학적 시 읽기의 즐거움, 동녘, 파주)
  23. Park, S. A., 2010, Le Portrait cultural de la ville tracee par 'les dechets', Journal of Societe Coreenne de Langue et Litterature FranCaises, 84, 909-944 (in korean).
  24. Park, S. K., 2009, A Search for the possibility of educational anthropology in social studies education, Research in Social Studies Education, 16(3), 51-61 (in korean).
  25. Park, S. K., 2010, Geography and Geography Education as the Humanities: Ask theRaison D'etre, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 45(6), 698-710 (in korean).
  26. Park, S. K., and Kim, I. K., 2001, Reconceptualizing the Geography Subject Matter Based on the Everyday Life, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 36(1), 1-14 (in korean).
  27. Santos, M., 1995, Contemporary Acceleration: Worldtime and World-space, in Benko, G. B. and U. Strohmayer, Geography, History and Social Sciences, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. Shields, R., 1997, Spatial stress and resistance: social meanings of spatialization, in Benko. G. & Strohmayer, U., Space and Social Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, 186-202.
  29. Yoon, S. B. (translation), 2007, Das Problem des Menschen, Ghill, Seoul(윤석빈 역, 인간의 조건, 길 , 서 울 ; Buber, M., Das Problem des Menschen, The Martin Estate).
  30. Woo, J. G., 2007, Zwischen Dialogphilosophie und Dialogpadagogik Martin Bubers, The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 139-161 (in korean).