참고문헌
- 교육과학기술부(2009). 2009개정 과학과 교육과정.
- 교육과학기술부(2011). 2011년 교원자격검정 실무편람. 교육과학기술부 교원정책과.
- 교육부 (1997). 제7차 과학과 교육과정. 서울: 대한교과서주식회사
- 교육인적자원부 (2007). 2007개정 과학과 교육과정.
- 남정희, 곽경화, 장경화, Hand, B. (2008). 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학글쓰기의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(8), 922-936.
- 이강님 (2007). 구성주의 학습전략이 중학생의 과학 개념학습과 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향 -과학 글쓰기 중심으로-. 전북대학교 박사학위 논문.
- 이미경, 손원숙, 노언경 (2007). PISA 2006 결과 분석 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구리포트.
- 이효녕, 조현호, 손정주 (2009). 학교과학교육에 서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), 666-679.
- 조정일(1991). 과학-기술-사회 교육과정에 관한연구, 한국과학교육학회지, 11(2), 87-101.
- Bodmer, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873
- Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Hand, B. M. (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1032-1038. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1032
- Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in school: A theoretical framework for evaluation inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
- Collette, A. T., & Chiapetta, E. L. (1984). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company
- Connolly, P., & Vilardi, T. (Eds.). (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press
- Cooper, M. M. (2005). An introduction to small-group learning. In N. J. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists' guide to effective teaching, 117-128. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Dewey, J. (1916). How we think. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559933
- Duschl, R., Ellenbogen, K., & Erduran, S. (1999). Middle school students' dialogic argumentation. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Kiel, Germany.
- Duschl, R. & Ellenbogen, K. (2002). Argumentation processes in science learning. Paper presented at an International Conference entitled Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic and Pedagogical considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction. University of Victoria, BC.
- Eisenberg, A., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544512
- European Commission (1995). White paper on education and training: Teaching and learning-toward the learning society (white paper). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications in European Countries.
- Halliday, M. A., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
- Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2006). When science and literacy meet in the secondary learning space: Implementing the science writing heuristic (SWH). University of Iowa.
- Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290165
- Harms, N. C. & Yager, R. E.(1981). What Research Says to the Science Teacher, vol. 3. Washington D. C. : National Science Teachers Association, 94-112.
- Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Hohenshell, L. H. (2004). Enhancing science literacy through implementation of writingto- learn strategies : Exploratory studies in high school biology. Dissertation. Iowa State University.
- Hohenshell, L. M., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing-to-learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: A mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336965
- Hurd, P. (1958). Scientific literacy: Its meaning for american school. Education Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
- Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178.
- Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139-178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
- Munby, A. H. (1980). Analysing teaching for intellectual independence. In H. Munby, G. Orpwood, & T. Russell (Eds.), Seeing curriculum in a new light: Essay from science education. Toronto: OISE Press.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Norris, S. (1997). Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education, 81(2), 239-258 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199704)81:2<239::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-G
- NSTA (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s. Atistsn NSTA Position Statement, NSTA, Washington D. C.
- NSTA (1990). Science-Technology-Society: A New Effect for Providing Appropriate Science for All. An NSTA Position Statement, NSTA. Washington D. C.
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideasabout- science"should be taught in school science? A delpi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
- Osborne, J., Erduran., S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290723
- Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00003-0
- Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U
- Schwarz, B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, 227-260.
- Shiland, T. W. (1999). Constructivism: The implications for laboratory work. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 107-109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p107
- Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In G. Rijlaarsdam, E. Esperet (Series eds.), Andriessen, J. E. B., Coirier, P. (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing 5: Foundations of argumentative text processing. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
- Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1991). I winyou lose: The development of argumentative thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
- Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students'knowledge and argumentation skills though dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
피인용 문헌
- 중학생의 성취 수준에 따른 탐구적 과학 글쓰기(Science Writing Heuristic) 수업의 효과 vol.33, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.952
- Application and Development of a Storytelling Teaching-learning Method Using the Science Writing Heuristic vol.17, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.3.709
- 논변, 논의 그리고 논증: 개념의 명료화를 위한 문헌조사 연구 vol.33, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- 예비 화학 교사의 논의와 글쓰기가 강조된 탐구 중심 과학 수업 계획과 수행: 어려움과 극복과정을 중심으로 vol.60, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.342
- A Study of Preliminary Biology Teachers’Scientific Inquiry Skills and LogicalThinking Ability through the Activity of Science Writing vol.44, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.114
- 화학 탐구 맥락에서 중등 과학 교사가 제시한 주장과 증거 분석 vol.61, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.6.359
- 논의기반 탐구 과학수업의 학급 논의 활동에서 나타나는 중학생들의 인식론적 사고의 특징 및 변화 vol.64, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.1.38