DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CALPUFF and AERMOD Dispersion Models for Estimating Odor Emissions from Industrial Complex Area Sources

  • Jeong, Sang-Jin (Department of Environmental and Energy Systems Engineering, Kyonggi University)
  • Received : 2010.07.27
  • Accepted : 2010.12.02
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

This study assesses the dispersion and emission rates of odor form industrial area source. CALPUFF and AERMOD Gaussian models were used for predicting downwind odor concentration and calculating odor emission rates. The studied region was Seobu industrial complex in Korea. Odor samples were collected five days over a year period in 2006. In-site meteorological data (wind direction and wind speed) were used to predict concentration. The BOOT statistical examination software was used to analyze the data. Comparison between the predicted and field sampled downwind concentration using BOOT analysis indicates that the CALPUFF model prediction is a little better than AERMOD prediction for average downwind odor concentrations. Predicted concentrations of AERMOD model have a little larger scatter than that of CALPUFF model. The results also show odor emission rates of Seobu industrial complex area were an order of 10 smaller than that of beef cattle feed lots.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, J.C., Hanna, S.R. (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 87, 167-196.
  2. Donnelly, R.P., Lyons, T.J., Flassak, T. (2007) Evaluation of results of a numerical simulation of dispersion in an idealized urban area for emergency response modelling. Atmospheric Environment 43, 4416-4423.
  3. Drew, G.H., Smith, R., Gerard, V., Burge, C., Lowe, M., Kinnersley, R., Sneath, R., Longhurst, P.J. (2007) Appropriateness of selecting different averaging times for modelling chronic and acute exposure to environmental odours. Atmospheric Environment 41, 2870-2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.022
  4. Earth Tech Inc. (2000) A user's guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model version 5, Concord MA.
  5. Faulkner, W.B., Lange, J.M., Powell, J.J., Shaw, B.W., Parnell, C.B. (2007) Sampler placement to determine emission factors from ground level area sources. Atmospheric Environment 41, 7622-7678.
  6. Hanna, S.R., Chang, J.C., Strimaitis, D.G. (1993) Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations. Atmospheric Environment 27A, 2265-2285.
  7. Holmes, N.S., Morawska, L. (2006) A review of dispersion modeling and its application to the dispersion particles: An overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric Environment 40, 5902-5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003
  8. Kwack, W.S., Chu, W.J., Lim, J.S., Kim, K.M., Jun, N.S., Lee, J.H., Lee, M.J., Hyun, J.Y., Bang, K.I. (2008) The study of the actual state of odor managing zones in Incheon metropolitan city. Korean Journal of Odor Research and Engineering 6(2), 106-155 (in Korean).
  9. Mussino, P., Gnyp, A.W., Henshaw, P.F. (2001) A fluctuating plume model dispersion model for the prediction of odour-impact frequencies from continuous stationary sources. Atmospheric Environment 35, 2955-2962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00419-2
  10. Nicell, J.A. (2009) Assessment and regulation of odor impacts. Atmospheric Environment 43, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.033
  11. Rosenkrank, H.S., Cunningham, A.R. (2003) Environmental Odors and health hazards. The Science of the Total Environment 313, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00330-9
  12. Sarkar, U., Hobbs, S.E., Longhurst, P. (2003) Dispersion odour: a case study with a municipal solid waste landfill site in North London, United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Management 68, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00060-4
  13. Sheridan, B.A., Hayes, E.T., Curran, T.P., Dodd, V.A., (2004) A dispersion modeling approach to determining the odour impact of intensive pig production units in Ireland. Bioresources Technology 91, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00179-2
  14. Smith, R.J. (1995) A Gaussian model for estimating odour emissions from area sources. Mathematical Computer Modelling 21(9), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(95)00048-7
  15. US EPA (2004) AERMOD: description of model formulation.
  16. Wang, L., Parker, D.B., Parnell, C.B., Lacey, E.E., Shaw, B.W. (2006) Comparison of CALPUFF and ISCST3 models for predicting downwind odor and source emission rates. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4663-4669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.043

Cited by

  1. A Status of Atmospheric Environmental Impact Assessment and Future Prospects vol.29, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.5.581
  2. Diet diversity among five co-existing fish species in a tropical river: integration of dietary and stable isotope data vol.15, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-013-0418-8
  3. Modeling the Odor Generation in WWTP: An Integrated Approach Review vol.225, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-1932-y
  4. Applications of WRF/CALPUFF modeling system and multi-monitoring methods to investigate the effect of seasonal variations on odor dispersion: a case study of Changwon City, South Korea vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0209-8
  5. Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling and Spatial Analysis to Evaluate Population Exposure to Pesticides from Farming Processes vol.9, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9020038
  6. Odor dispersion modeling with CALPUFF: Case study of a waste and residue treatment incineration and utilization plant in Kocaeli, Turkey vol.19, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2017.1408160
  7. AERMOD 모델을 이용한 산단 지역 악취 배출량 및 주거지역 영향 범위 평가 vol.27, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5572/kosae.2011.27.1.087
  8. 역모델링 기법을 이용한 동해항 주변지역 미세먼지 배출량 산출 vol.32, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12925/jkocs.2015.32.4.649
  9. 구미국가산업단지의 트리메틸아민 악취모델링 vol.54, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2016.54.2.187
  10. 축사 주변의 악취 및 부유분진의 CALPUFF 모델링: 계사 중심으로 vol.57, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2019.57.1.90
  11. Establishment of suitable separation distance by using different methods for malodor mitigation from palm oil mill vol.26, pp.23, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05517-z
  12. Mathematical and experimental study of hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the Kahrizak landfill, Tehran, Iran vol.24, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.265
  13. RESILIENT: A robust statistical method for estimating multiple VOC sources from limited field measurements vol.6, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05296
  14. Analysis of PM10 dispersion models from coal-fired power plant activities in North Sumatera by using CALPUFF vol.802, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012033