DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage Estimation of Large-Sized Vessels due to Ship-to-Ship Collisions and Ship Groundings

충돌 및 좌초 사고에 의한 대형 상선의 손상 추정

  • Choung, Joon-Mo (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Seong (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Nam, Ji-Myung (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Ha, Tae-Bum (Research and Development Center, Korean Register of Shipping)
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 이민성 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 남지명 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 하태범 (한국선급 기술연구소)
  • Received : 2010.07.26
  • Accepted : 2010.10.06
  • Published : 2011.02.20

Abstract

For the assessment of ultimate longitudinal strengths of damaged hull girders, it is preliminarily necessary to determine the extents and locations of the damages due to severe accidents. This paper deals with the estimation of the damages from collisions and groundings of large-sized vessels where deterministic and probabilistic approaches are investigated. Deterministic damages estimated from MARPOL(or ICLL), ABS and DNV are compared with probabilistic damages from IMO guideline and some references including damage statistic data. Damages from MARPOL show largest one among all the investigated damage estimation, since it was developed not for the residual strength of hull girder but for the damage stability calculation. IMO guideline with high level probability of damage(eg. 95% probability level) also forecasts even severer damage extents than MARPOL. On the other hand, assuming average probability level of damage, the calculated damage sizes are around the one from deterministic approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. American Bureau of Shipping(ABS), 1995. Guide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 1995) Available at: http://www.eagle.org/ [Accessed June 2010].
  2. Cho, S.R. & Lee, S.H., 2005. Residual Longitudinal Strength Analysis of Damaged Ships. Proceeding of Autumn Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea(SNAK), 3-4 November, Yongin Korea, pp.405-412.
  3. Cho, S.K. et al., 2005. 24th ITTC Benchmark Study on Numerical Prediction of Damage Ship Stability. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 42(5), pp.435-447. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.5.435
  4. Det Norske Veritas(DNV), 2009. Rules for Classification of Ships Part 3 Chapter 1. DNV.
  5. Han, D.S. et al., 2007. A Study of Strength of Damaged Ship Structures Using Damage Simulator. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 44(4), pp.439-444. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2007.44.4.439
  6. International Association of Classification Societies(IACS), 2010a. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at: http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/[Accessed August 2010].
  7. International Association of Classification Societies(IACS),2010b. Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at: http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/ [Accessed August 2010].
  8. International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1966. International Convention on Load Lines(ICLL) Annex B Annex I Chapter III. IMO.
  9. International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1995. Interim Guidelines for Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex I of MARPOL 73/78, Resolution MEPC. 66(37). IMO.
  10. International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1997. MARPOL 73/78 & 1984 Amend Annex I Chapter III Requirement for Minimizing Oil Pollution from Oil Tankers due to Side and Bottom Damages. IMO.
  11. International Maritime Organization(IMO), 2003. Revised Interim Guidelines for the Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex II of MARPOL 73/78, Resolution MEPC.110(49). IMO.
  12. Lee, D. et al., 2009. A Study on the Damage Safety Assessment in Ship Design Stage. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46(3), pp.343-350. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2009.46.3.343
  13. Lee, S. & Lee, D., 2008. Development of Integrated System for Safety Assessment of Damaged Ship. Journal of CAD/CAM Engineers of Korea, 13(3), pp.227-234.
  14. Lee, S.S. Lee, D. & Kim, K.S., 2009. Development of Design Technology for Safety Enhancement of Damaged Ship. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46(1), pp.69-77. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2009.46.1.069
  15. Lee, D. Hong, S.Y. & Lee, K.J., 2006. Theoretical and Experimental Studies on Dynamic Behavior of a Damaged Ship in Waves. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 43(1), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2006.43.1.001
  16. Lützen, M., 2001. Ship Collision Damage. Ph.D Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark.
  17. Paik, J.K. Thayamballi, A.K. & Yang, S.H., 1998. Residual Strength Assessment of Ships after Collision and Grounding. Marine Technology, 35(1), pp.38-54.
  18. Pedersen, P.T. & Zhang, S., 2000. Effect of Ship Structure and Size on Grounding and Collision Damage Distributions. Ocean Engineering, 27, pp.1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(99)00043-8
  19. Smith, C.S., 1977. Influence of Local Compression Failure on Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of a Ship Hull. Proc. of International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding (PRADS), 18-20 October, Tokyo Japan, pp.73-79.
  20. Skjong, R. & Vanem, E., 2004. Damage Stability Evaluation in Collision of Bulk Carriers. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships(ICCGS), 25-27 October, Izu Japan, pp.97-103.
  21. Tagg, T. et al., 2002. Updated Vertical Extent of Collision Damage. Marine Structures, 15, pp.475–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00015-1
  22. Wang, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. & Peng, H., 2002. Longitudinal Strength of Ships with Accidental Damages. Marine Structures, 15, pp.119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00018-1
  23. Zhu, L. James, P. & Zhang, S., 2002. Statistics and Damage Assessment of Ship Grounding. Marine Structures, 15, pp. 515-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00013-8

Cited by

  1. Residual Longitudinal Strength of a VLCC Considering Probabilistic Damage Extents vol.49, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2012.49.2.124