Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2011.48.1.33

Damage Estimation of Large-Sized Vessels due to Ship-to-Ship Collisions and Ship Groundings  

Choung, Joon-Mo (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
Lee, Min-Seong (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
Nam, Ji-Myung (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
Ha, Tae-Bum (Research and Development Center, Korean Register of Shipping)
Publication Information
Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea / v.48, no.1, 2011 , pp. 33-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
For the assessment of ultimate longitudinal strengths of damaged hull girders, it is preliminarily necessary to determine the extents and locations of the damages due to severe accidents. This paper deals with the estimation of the damages from collisions and groundings of large-sized vessels where deterministic and probabilistic approaches are investigated. Deterministic damages estimated from MARPOL(or ICLL), ABS and DNV are compared with probabilistic damages from IMO guideline and some references including damage statistic data. Damages from MARPOL show largest one among all the investigated damage estimation, since it was developed not for the residual strength of hull girder but for the damage stability calculation. IMO guideline with high level probability of damage(eg. 95% probability level) also forecasts even severer damage extents than MARPOL. On the other hand, assuming average probability level of damage, the calculated damage sizes are around the one from deterministic approaches.
Keywords
Collision; Grounding; Damage; Damage length; Damage penetration; Damage depth; Residual strength; Damage PDF;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lützen, M., 2001. Ship Collision Damage. Ph.D Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark.
2 Paik, J.K. Thayamballi, A.K. & Yang, S.H., 1998. Residual Strength Assessment of Ships after Collision and Grounding. Marine Technology, 35(1), pp.38-54.
3 Pedersen, P.T. & Zhang, S., 2000. Effect of Ship Structure and Size on Grounding and Collision Damage Distributions. Ocean Engineering, 27, pp.1161–1179.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Smith, C.S., 1977. Influence of Local Compression Failure on Ultimate Longitudinal Strength of a Ship Hull. Proc. of International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding (PRADS), 18-20 October, Tokyo Japan, pp.73-79.
5 Skjong, R. & Vanem, E., 2004. Damage Stability Evaluation in Collision of Bulk Carriers. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships(ICCGS), 25-27 October, Izu Japan, pp.97-103.
6 Tagg, T. et al., 2002. Updated Vertical Extent of Collision Damage. Marine Structures, 15, pp.475–498.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Wang, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. & Peng, H., 2002. Longitudinal Strength of Ships with Accidental Damages. Marine Structures, 15, pp.119-138.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Zhu, L. James, P. & Zhang, S., 2002. Statistics and Damage Assessment of Ship Grounding. Marine Structures, 15, pp. 515-530.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 International Association of Classification Societies(IACS),2010b. Common Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at: http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/ [Accessed August 2010].
10 International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1966. International Convention on Load Lines(ICLL) Annex B Annex I Chapter III. IMO.
11 International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1995. Interim Guidelines for Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex I of MARPOL 73/78, Resolution MEPC. 66(37). IMO.
12 International Maritime Organization(IMO), 1997. MARPOL 73/78 & 1984 Amend Annex I Chapter III Requirement for Minimizing Oil Pollution from Oil Tankers due to Side and Bottom Damages. IMO.
13 Lee, S.S. Lee, D. & Kim, K.S., 2009. Development of Design Technology for Safety Enhancement of Damaged Ship. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46(1), pp.69-77.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
14 International Maritime Organization(IMO), 2003. Revised Interim Guidelines for the Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex II of MARPOL 73/78, Resolution MEPC.110(49). IMO.
15 Lee, D. et al., 2009. A Study on the Damage Safety Assessment in Ship Design Stage. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46(3), pp.343-350.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Lee, S. & Lee, D., 2008. Development of Integrated System for Safety Assessment of Damaged Ship. Journal of CAD/CAM Engineers of Korea, 13(3), pp.227-234.   과학기술학회마을
17 Lee, D. Hong, S.Y. & Lee, K.J., 2006. Theoretical and Experimental Studies on Dynamic Behavior of a Damaged Ship in Waves. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 43(1), pp.1-14.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Cho, S.K. et al., 2005. 24th ITTC Benchmark Study on Numerical Prediction of Damage Ship Stability. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 42(5), pp.435-447.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 American Bureau of Shipping(ABS), 1995. Guide for Assessing Hull-Girder Residual Strength for Tankers. [Online] (Updated July 1995) Available at: http://www.eagle.org/ [Accessed June 2010].
20 Cho, S.R. & Lee, S.H., 2005. Residual Longitudinal Strength Analysis of Damaged Ships. Proceeding of Autumn Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea(SNAK), 3-4 November, Yongin Korea, pp.405-412.
21 Det Norske Veritas(DNV), 2009. Rules for Classification of Ships Part 3 Chapter 1. DNV.
22 Han, D.S. et al., 2007. A Study of Strength of Damaged Ship Structures Using Damage Simulator. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 44(4), pp.439-444.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
23 International Association of Classification Societies(IACS), 2010a. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers. [Online] (Updated July 2010) Available at: http://www.iacs-data.org.uk/[Accessed August 2010].