한국건축시공학회지 (Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction)

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.35-44
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-2033(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-5706(eISSN)
한국건축시공학회 (The Korean Institute of Building Construction)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 건설기업 경영성과의 핵심성과지표 도출에 관한 연구

The Management Evaluation Key Performance Indicators of Korean Construction Firms

  • Lee, Dong-Hoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Seon-Hyung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Gi-Deoc (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Man-Ki (Dong-Bu Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Kuk (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2010.11.11
  • 심사 : 2010.12.17
  • 발행 : 2011.02.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기업 활동에 있어 성과측정은 경영성과의 평가, 인적 자원의 관리 및 전략이행의 중요한 도구로 사용된다. 기업의 경영성과 측정은 당기 순이익, 투자수익률, 자기자본 이익률과 같이 단순히 재무적 관점에서 측정할 수 있으나 기업의 내부프로세스나 정보화와 같은 재무외적 성과를 측정할 수 없어 부족함이 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 국내의 시공능력순위 30위 이내의 건설기업에 적용 가능한 핵심 성과지표(KPI:Key Performance Indicators)를 도출하였으며, 기존의 연구와 기업 전문가의 설문을 반영하여 보다 현실적인 기업의 경영을 반영하며 기존의 연구와 차별된 결과를 도출하였다.

Business performance measurement is used as an important tool to evaluate management performance, control human resources, and implement strategies. It can be measured simply in terms of finance including net profit, return on investment, and return on equity, but this is not sufficient because the performance outside of finance such as internal business process and informatization cannot be examined. Therefore this study defined a KPI(Key Performance Indicators) applicable to local construction companies ranked in the top 30 in construction capability, and also introduced differentiated results from the earlier studies by reflecting more realistic corporate management based on the existing studies and interviews with business experts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Chin SY. Analysis of Quantified Characteristics of the Performance Indicators for Construction Companies, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2006;7(4):154-163.
  2. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, January-february 1992.
  3. Niven PR, Balanced scorecard step-by-step, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
  4. Ittner CD, Larcker DF. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1998;10:205-238.
  5. Lee KH, Pyo JH. strategic achievement evaluation system, 21th Books, 1996.
  6. Hyun JS. Cause of Success or failure of Construction Management after IMF, Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea, 2002;1-84.
  7. Cha HS, Kim TK. Developing Measurement System for Key Performance Indicators on Building Construction Projects, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2008;9(4):120-130.
  8. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Chin SY, Kim YS. A Framework of the Comparable Performance Measurement in the Construction Industry, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2004;5(5):172-182.
  9. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Chin SY. Key Performance Indicators for Developing Construction Performance Index, Architectural Institute of Korea , 2005;21(2):139-150.
  10. Jung WJ, Yu IH, Kim KR, Shin DW. Analysis of the Weights of Performance Measurement Index according to the Size of Construction Companies, Architectural Institute of Korea, 2005;21(8):121-128.
  11. Oh IJ, Lee JH, Lee CC. BSC Perspective of an Exploratory study of Developing CSF/KPI Pool in Korean Construction Industry, Korea Society of IT Services, 2006;5(1):35-46.
  12. Son MH. A Comparative Analysis of the Whights of Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures According to Corporate life Cycle, The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 2003;28(1):79-96.
  13. Shenhar A, Levy O, Dvir D. Mapping the dimensions of project success, Project Management Journal, 1997;28(2):5-13.
  14. Ryu SW, Ahn BJ, Ryu MW. Deductions of KPIs for BSC and Process KPIs for BPM in Railway Construction, Koeran society for railway, 2006;9(4):388-393.
  15. Kim DK, Kim HJ, Park YW. A Study on the Development of KPI in the Super Deluxe Hotel Business in Seoul Korea Using BSC, Korean Academic Society of Hospitality Administration, 2009;18(3):133-151.
  16. Park MS, Kwon KH, Kwon JH. Courier company's key performance indicators (KPI) Determinants, Korea information society development institute, 2004;1-29.
  17. Lee DH, Kim SK, Shin DH. A Correlation Analysis between the Change of Managerial Environment and the Business Performance of Domestic Construction Firms, The Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2009;9(1):111-121. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2009.9.1.111
  18. Lee DH. An Evaluation Technique of Corporate Management Performance Using Project Information, 2010.
  19. Cha WC, Lee JS, Kwon W, Lee JS, Chun JY. Assessment Model of a Construction Company's Management Performance, Architectural Institute of Korea, 2008;28(1):661-664.
  20. Robert JW, Thomas JP, Julien RP. Structure is not organization, Business Horizons, 1980;23(3):14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis of the Competitive Structure of the Construction Management Market vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2013.13.2.193
  2. Quantification of a Global Construction Core Competencies for Korean Construction/Engineering Firms vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.6.2541
  3. Identifying the Key Financial Ratios to Evaluate Korean Construction Firms' Soundness vol.31, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2015.31.7.117
  4. Influence of the Business Portfolio Diversification on Construction Companies' Financial Stability vol.15, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.6.105
  5. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Construction Business Management Success vol.14, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.4.046