DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Fish on the Grazing Pressure of Zooplankton in the Artificial Mesocosms

인공메소코즘에서 동물플랑크톤의 섭식압에 대한 어류의 영향

  • Received : 2011.05.24
  • Accepted : 2011.10.28
  • Published : 2011.11.30

Abstract

In a natural water body, a useful ecotechnology to reduce standing crops of phytoplankton is to strengthen the top-down force of zooplankton. However, the predation of fish for zooplankton can make the force weak. This study was conducted to find out the effect of fish on the grazing pressure of zooplankton in the mesocosms established in a eutrophic stream (Kyongan Stream) from October to November in 2010. In the corral with fish, chlorophyll a concentration increased, and a small size cladoceran Bosmina longirostris was dominant. In the corral without fish, chlorophyll a concentration decreased along with the domination of a large cladoceran Daphnia galeata and a large copepod Eudiaptomus japonicus. The size-selective predation of fish appeared to miniaturize the zooplankton community, to narrow their food-size spectrum, and to weaken the top-down force.

Keywords

References

  1. 공동수, 천세억, 정원화, 전선옥, 김종택, 김종민, 류재근 (1995). 호소내 오염하천 유입부의 식물에 의한 정화처리 연구(Ι), 한강물환경연구소.
  2. 국토해양부(2010). 포식성 천적생물을 이용한 녹조방지 기술개발 최종보고서.
  3. 김익수(1997). 한국동식물도감 제37권 동물편(담수어류). 교육부.
  4. 나은경, 신경숙, 장재헌, 강호(2003). 전자선조사를 이용한 부영양화 호수의 조류제어에 관한 연구. 춘계학술연구발표대회논문집, 대한환경공학회, pp. 504-509.
  5. 농어촌공사(2010). 조류발생 메카니즘 규명 및 조류저감을 위한 수생식물 이용기술 개발 결과보고서.
  6. 유경아, 박혜경, 공동수, 황순진(2010). 한강 수계 주요 댐호에서의 동물플랑크톤 군집 구조와 천이. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 26(5), pp. 850-859.
  7. 이상재, 이재연, 안광국(2007). 조류제거 효과에 대한 Topdown 어류 조작실험. 한국하천호수학회지, 40(3), pp. 431-438.
  8. 정준(1993). 한국담수조류도감, 아카데미출판사.
  9. Ahn, C. Y., Park, M. H., Joung, S. H., Kim, H. S., Jang, K. Y., and Oh, H. M. (2003). Growth inhibition of cyanobacteria by ultrasonic radiation; Labortory and enclosure studies. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(13), pp. 3031-3037. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034048z
  10. Andersen, A. and Hessen, D. O. (1991). Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents of freshwater zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, pp. 807-814. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0807
  11. Boon, P. I., Bunn, S. E., Green, J. D., and Shiel, R. J. (1994). Consumption of cyanobacteria by freshwater zooplankton: Implications for the success of 'top-down' control of cyanobacterial blooms in Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45(5), pp. 875-887. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9940875
  12. Culver, D. A., Boucherle, M. M., Bean, D. J., and Flethcer, J. W. (1985). Biomass of freshwater crustacean zooplankton from Length-Weight regressions. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, pp. 1380-1390. https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-173
  13. Downing, J. A. and Rigler, F. H. R. (1984). A Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Freshwater, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  14. Dumont, H. J., Velde, L. V. De., and Dumont, S. (1975). The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia, 19(1), pp. 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377592
  15. Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., and Mollenhauer, D. (1986). SuBwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/1. Bacillariophyceae, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
  16. Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., and Mollenhauer, D. (1988). SuBwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/2. Bacillariophyceae, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Berlin.
  17. Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., and Mollenhauer, D. (1991a). SuBwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/3. Bacillariophyceae, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Berlin.
  18. Ettl, H., Gartner, J., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., and Mollenhauer, D. (1991b). SuBwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/4. Bacillariophyceae, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
  19. Gophen, M. (1990). Biomanipulation: retrospective and future development. Hydrobiologia, 200/201, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530324
  20. Hall, D. T., Threlkeld, S. T., Burns, C. W., and Crowley, P. H. (1976). The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 7, pp. 177-208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.001141
  21. Hansson, L. A. and Bronmark, C. (2009). Biomanipulation of Aquatic Ecosystems. Encyclopedia of inland waters. pp. 242-248.
  22. Hirose, H. M., Akiyama, T., Imahori, K., Kasaki, H., Kumana, S., Kobayasi, H., Takahashi, E., Tsumura, T., Hirano, M., and Yamagishi, T. (1977). Illustration of the Japanese freshwater algae. Uchidarokakuho Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. pp. 932.
  23. Jimenez, F., Rodriguez, J., Bautista, B., and Rodriguez, V. (1987). Relations between chlorophyll, phytoplankton cell abundance and biobolume during a winter bloom in mediterranean costal water. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol., 105, pp. 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(87)90169-9
  24. O'Brien, W. J. (1979). The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Am. Sci., 67, pp. 572-581.
  25. Odate, T. and Yanada, M. (1993). Phytoplankton carbon biomass estimated from the size-fractionated Chl.$\alpha$ concentration and cell density in the northern coastal waters from spring bloom to summer. Bull Plankton Soc. Japan. 39(2), pp. 127-144.
  26. Opuszynski, K. (1978). The influence of the silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Val.) on eutrophication of the environment of carp ponds. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych., 99, pp. 127-151.
  27. Pace, M. L. and Orcutt, J. D. (1981). The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community. Limnol. Oceanogr., 26(5), pp. 822-830. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.5.0822
  28. Patrick, R. and Reimer, C. W. (1975). The Diatoms of the United Sates. Exclusive of alaska and Hawaii, Vol. II part 1. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. pp. 213.
  29. Prescott, G. W. (1962). Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Otto Koeltz Science Publisher, Germany. pp. 976.
  30. Schol, A. T., Soltero, R. A., McKee, K. O., Anderson, E., and Uehara, J. K. (1985). Biomanipulation of a trout fishery and its effect on zooplankton composition, phytoplankton biovolume and water quality of medical lake, Spokane Co., Washington, USA. Proc. 4th Annu. Conf. Int. Symp. N. Am. Lake Manage. Sco., 4, pp. 48-56.
  31. Shapiro, J. (1990). Biomanipulation : the next phase-making it stable. Hydrobiol., 200(201), pp. 13-17.
  32. Shapiro, J., Lamarra, V., and Lynch, M. (1975). Biomanipulation: An Ecosystem Approach to Lake Restoration. In: P. L. Brezonik and J. L. Fox (eds.), Proc. Symp. on Water Quality Management Through Biological Control. University of Florida, pp. 85-96.
  33. Shapiro, J. V. and Wright, D. I. (1984). Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshwater. Biol., 14, pp. 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00161.x
  34. Sigee, D. C., Glenn, R., Andrews, M. J., Andrews, E. G., Belinger, E. G., Butler, R. D., Epton, H. A. S., and Hendry, R. D. (1999). Biological control of cyanobacteria: principles and possibilities. Hydrobiologia, 395(396), pp. 161-172.
  35. Sosnovsky, A. and Quiros, R. (2009). Effects of fish manipulation on the plankton community in small hypertrophic lakes from the pampa plain (Argentina). Limnologica, 39(3), pp. 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2008.04.004
  36. Stenson, J. A. E., Bohlin, T., and Henrikson, L. (1978). Effects of fish removal in a small lake. Verk. Int. Verein. Limnol., 20, pp. 794-801.
  37. Theiss, J., Zielinski, L., and Lang, H. (1990). Biomanipulation by introduction of herbivorous zooplankton. A helpful shock for eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiologia, 200(201), pp. 59-68.
  38. Vijerberg, J., Gulati, R. D., and Mooij, W. M. (1993). Food web studies in shallow eutrophic lakes by the Netherands institute of ecology : Main results, knowledge gaps and new perspectives. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecol., 27(1), pp. 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02336927