Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microshear bond strength of a self-etching primer adhesive to enamel according to the type of bur

삭제기구의 종류에 따른 자가부식 프라이머 접착제의 법랑질에 대한 미세전단 결합강도

  • Jeong, Jin-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chosun University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, SeoYeong University)
  • 정진호 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이명선 (서영대학교 치위생과)
  • Received : 2011.07.29
  • Accepted : 2011.09.26
  • Published : 2011.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (uSBS) to enamel prepared with different burs and to determine what type of bur were chosen when a self-etching primer adhesive was used. Materials and Methods: Enamel of forty-two human molars were used. They were divided into one of six groups (n = 7), Group 1, coarse (125 - 150 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; Group 2, standard (106 - 125 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; Group 3, fine (53 - 63 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; Group 4, extrafine (20 - 30 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; Group 5, plaincut carbide bur (no. 245); Group 6, cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557). Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical Inc.) was bonded to enamel surface. The bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing. Results: The uSBS of Group 4 was the highest among groups and it was significantly higher than that of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 6 (p < 0.05), but it was not significantly different from that of Group 5. Conclusions: Different burs used on enamel surface affected the microshear bond strengths of a self-etching primer adhesive to the enamel surface. In the case of Clearfil SE Bond, extrafine diamond and plain-cut carbide bur are recommended for bonding to enamel.

연구목적: 이 연구는 서로 다른 버로 형성한 법랑질 표면에 대한 자가부식 프라이머 접착제의 결합강도를 상호 비교함으로써 법랑질에 우수한 접착 표면을 제공하는 적절한 버를 알아보기 위해 시행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 42개의 발거된 대구치 치관의 법랑질을 이용하였고, 법랑질을 삭제하는 기구의 종류에 따라 6개군, 즉 1군은 Coarse (125 - 150 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; 2군은 standard (106 - 125 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; 3군은 fine (53 - 63 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; 4군은 extrafine (20 - 30 ${\mu}m$) diamond bur; 5군은 plain-cut carbide bur (no. 245); 6군은 cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557)으로 분류하였다. 각 군의 법랑질 표면에 Clearfil SE Bond를 적용한 후 Tygon tube를 이용하여 Clearfil AP-X를 접착하였다. 각 군의 미세전단 결합강도를 측정하였다. 결과: 4군의 결합강도는 모든 군중 가장 높게 나타나 1군, 2군, 3군 및 6군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났으며(p < 0.05), 5군과는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(p > 0.05). 결론: 버의 종류와 다이아몬드 버의 입자크기는 약한 자가 산부식 프라이머 접착제의 법랑질에 대한 결합강도에 영향을 주었다. Clearfil SE Bond의 법랑질에 대한 우수한 접착을 위해서는 초미세입자 다이아몬드 버나 plain-cut 카바이드 버의 사용이 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
  2. Kim YH, Park JG, Cho YG. Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2007;32:327-334. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.327
  3. Lee MG, Cho KH, Cho YG. Microleakage of 2-step adhesive systems in diamond-prepared cavity. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2007;32:437-444. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.5.437
  4. Moll K, Park HJ, Haller B. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin bond strength of self-etching bonding systems. Am J Dent 2005;18:335-339.
  5. Hobson RS, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Booth TA. Acid-etch patterns on the buccal surface of human permanent teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:407-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00008-0
  6. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of selfetching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 1998;14:99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00015-3
  7. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003;16:329-334.
  8. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of selfetching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:32-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00280.x
  9. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999;27:523-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00008-1
  10. Senawongse P, Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00016.x
  11. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002;15:305-308.
  12. Toledano M, Osorio R, De Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of selfetching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14:205-210.
  13. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997;10:141-146.
  14. Ikeda T, Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawakami S, Komatsu H, Sano H. Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 2002;15:109-113.
  15. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 2003;28:20-27.
  16. Jung M, Wehlen LO, Klimek J. Surface roughness and bond strength of enamel to composite. Dent Mater 1999;15:250-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00042-1
  17. Dias WR, Pereira PN, Swift EJ Jr. Effect of bur types on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:195-203.
  18. Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Suefiji C, Nozaka K, Garcia-Gody F. Effects of diamond bur particle size on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 2004;17:359-364.
  19. Lee YG, Moon SR, Cho YG. Effect of cutting instruments on the dentin bond strength of a self-etch adhesive. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2010;35:13-19. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.1.013
  20. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1404-1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750061201
  21. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid:an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24:172-180.
  22. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  23. Shimada Y, Iwamoto N, Kawashima M, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of current adhesive systems to enamel, dentin and dentin-enamel junction region. Oper Dent 2003;28:585-590.
  24. Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Am J Dent 2002;15:373-377.
  25. Lopes GC, Marson FC, Vieira LC, de Caldeira AM, Baratieri LN. Composite bond strength to enamel with self-etching primers. Oper Dent 2004;29:424-429.
  26. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II:etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00104-4
  27. Tay FR, Pashley DH, King NM, Carvalho RM, Tsai J, Lai SC, Marquezini L Jr. Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel. Oper Dent 2004;29:309-316.
  28. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002;27:403-409.