Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지

The Role of Environmental Assessment for Environmental Land Use Planning

환경친화적 토지이용계획 수립을 위한 환경평가의 역할과 특성: 환경평가 검토의견분석을 중심으로

  • Received : 2009.11.11
  • Accepted : 2009.12.21
  • Published : 2010.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the relationship between environmental assessment (EA) and land use planning through the theoretical and practical perspective. Theoretically, this research studies environmental land use planning incorporating with environmental assessment. Practically, through the review on EA review opinion in Korea Environment Institute for recent 10 years, environmental land use mitigations are investigated. The results of this study are as follows:first, there have been new and innovative review criteria and mitigation methods in environmental assessment; second, land use mitigation tools have been mostly used in environmental assessment; finally, there is a need for mediating role by land use section in EA review system.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부. 2007. 지속가능한 신도시 계획 기준.
  2. 김지영 외. 2002. 환경영향의 합리적 예측평가를 위한 기법 연구. 한국환경정책․평가연구원.
  3. 대한국토․도시계획학회. 2008. 토지이용계획. 보성각.
  4. 조공장 외. 2008. 환경평가제도 30년의 성과분석과 발전방향. 한국환경정책․평가연구원.
  5. 한국토지공사. 2007. 살고싶은 도시건설을 위한 도시개발편람.
  6. 환경부. 2003. 환경친화적 계획기법 및 운용방안 개발에 관한 연구.
  7. 환경부. 2004. 환경친화적 계획기법 작성을 위한 가이드라인 마련 연구.
  8. 환경부. 2006. 사전환경성 검토 매뉴얼.
  9. Berke, P. R. 2002. Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 17(1) : 21-36.
  10. Berke, P. R. 2008. The Evolution of Green Community Planning, Scholarship, and Practice : An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4) : 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802381751
  11. Berke, P. R., D. Godschalk and E. Kaiser. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning (5th Ed.), University of Illinois Press.
  12. Berke, P. R., and M. Manta-Conroy. 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An Evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1) : 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081
  13. Burchell et al. 1998. Costs of sprawl-2000. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press.
  14. Calthorpe, P. 1993. The next American metropolis : Ecology, community, and the American Dream. New York : Princeton Architectural Press.
  15. Calthorpe, P., and W. Fulton. 2001. The regional City. Washington, DC : Island.
  16. Campbell, S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban Planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (3) : 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696
  17. Chapin, F. S., and E. J. Kaiser. 1979. Urban Land Use Planning (3rd Ed.). Chicago : University of Illinois Press.
  18. Daniels T., and K. Daniels. 2003. The Environmental Planning Handbook. Washinton, D.C.
  19. Duany, A. 1992. Towns and town-making principles. New York : Rizzoli.
  20. Duany, Plater-Zyberke and Company. 2001. Smart code. Miami, FL : Author.
  21. Ewing, R. 1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1) : 107-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975728
  22. Fainstein, S. 2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4) : 451-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740003500401
  23. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York : John Wiley.
  24. Godschalk, D. R. 2004. Land Use Planning Challenges : Coping with Conflicts in Vision of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1) : 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976334
  25. Harvey, D. 1997. The new urbanism and the communitarian trap. Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring.
  26. Jepson, E. 2001. Sustainability and planning : Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(4) : 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541220101500401
  27. Kaiser, E. J., and D. R. Godschalk. 1995. Twentieth Century Land Use Planning Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3) : 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975648
  28. McDonlad, G. T., and L. Brown. 1995. Going beyond environmental impact assessment : Environmental input to planning and design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(6) : 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00077-1
  29. Randolph, J. 2003. Environmental Land Use Planning and Management. Island Press.
  30. Porter. D. 2002. The Practice of sustainable development. Washington, D.C. : Urban Land Institute.