Browse > Article

The Role of Environmental Assessment for Environmental Land Use Planning  

Jung, Ju-Chul (Pusan National University)
Park, Jeong-Il (Georgia Institute Technology)
Lee, Dal-Byul (Georgia Institute Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.13, no.2, 2010 , pp. 8-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the relationship between environmental assessment (EA) and land use planning through the theoretical and practical perspective. Theoretically, this research studies environmental land use planning incorporating with environmental assessment. Practically, through the review on EA review opinion in Korea Environment Institute for recent 10 years, environmental land use mitigations are investigated. The results of this study are as follows:first, there have been new and innovative review criteria and mitigation methods in environmental assessment; second, land use mitigation tools have been mostly used in environmental assessment; finally, there is a need for mediating role by land use section in EA review system.
Keywords
Land Use Mitigation; Environmental Assessment; Korea Environment Institute; EA review analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 국토해양부. 2007. 지속가능한 신도시 계획 기준.
2 김지영 외. 2002. 환경영향의 합리적 예측평가를 위한 기법 연구. 한국환경정책․평가연구원.
3 대한국토․도시계획학회. 2008. 토지이용계획. 보성각.
4 Porter. D. 2002. The Practice of sustainable development. Washington, D.C. : Urban Land Institute.
5 McDonlad, G. T., and L. Brown. 1995. Going beyond environmental impact assessment : Environmental input to planning and design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(6) : 483-495.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Harvey, D. 1997. The new urbanism and the communitarian trap. Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring.
7 Jepson, E. 2001. Sustainability and planning : Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(4) : 499-510.   DOI
8 Kaiser, E. J., and D. R. Godschalk. 1995. Twentieth Century Land Use Planning Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3) : 365-385.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Randolph, J. 2003. Environmental Land Use Planning and Management. Island Press.
10 Calthorpe, P. 1993. The next American metropolis : Ecology, community, and the American Dream. New York : Princeton Architectural Press.
11 Calthorpe, P., and W. Fulton. 2001. The regional City. Washington, DC : Island.
12 Campbell, S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban Planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (3) : 296-312.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chapin, F. S., and E. J. Kaiser. 1979. Urban Land Use Planning (3rd Ed.). Chicago : University of Illinois Press.
14 Daniels T., and K. Daniels. 2003. The Environmental Planning Handbook. Washinton, D.C.
15 Duany, A. 1992. Towns and town-making principles. New York : Rizzoli.
16 Duany, Plater-Zyberke and Company. 2001. Smart code. Miami, FL : Author.
17 Ewing, R. 1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1) : 107-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Fainstein, S. 2000. New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4) : 451-478.   DOI
19 Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York : John Wiley.
20 Godschalk, D. R. 2004. Land Use Planning Challenges : Coping with Conflicts in Vision of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1) : 5-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Berke, P. R. 2002. Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 17(1) : 21-36.
22 Berke, P. R. 2008. The Evolution of Green Community Planning, Scholarship, and Practice : An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4) : 393-407.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Berke, P. R., D. Godschalk and E. Kaiser. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning (5th Ed.), University of Illinois Press.
24 한국토지공사. 2007. 살고싶은 도시건설을 위한 도시개발편람.
25 Berke, P. R., and M. Manta-Conroy. 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An Evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1) : 21-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Burchell et al. 1998. Costs of sprawl-2000. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press.
27 조공장 외. 2008. 환경평가제도 30년의 성과분석과 발전방향. 한국환경정책․평가연구원.
28 환경부. 2003. 환경친화적 계획기법 및 운용방안 개발에 관한 연구.
29 환경부. 2004. 환경친화적 계획기법 작성을 위한 가이드라인 마련 연구.
30 환경부. 2006. 사전환경성 검토 매뉴얼.