Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (기술혁신학회지)

Korea Technology Innovation Society (한국기술혁신학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Improving the Public Technology Procurement Policy for Reinforcing the Efficiency of R&D in SMEs : In Consideration of Joining the Green Growth Plan

중소기업의 녹색성장 참여촉진을 위한 기술개발제품 공공구매제도 개선방안 연구

  • Received : 2010.02.03
  • Accepted : 2010.06.26
  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, US, EU and major development countries, including Korea, have set green growth strategy the for national robust economic growth. Green growth strategy was also adopted as economic stimulus policy. Korea also have established some policies for green growth such as Green Growth National Strategy and 5-years Plan. Thought the SMEs play an important role as the innovative driver that can supply material and components for final products, there are few policies for joining green growth strategy. So, the purpose of this paper is to explore the current extent of public procurement for technology-development products and propose the betterment of it. Firstly, we analyzed the public procurement-policies of major countries to kinds of policy-purposes and types including Korea. and then we deducted the needs to policy utilizing the public procurement for joining the SMEs to green growth strategy. Second, we proposed that the objects of purchase conditional public procurement policy be extent to the pre-commercial technologies. The pre-commercial technologies could be performed further R&D by some other compaines or pubic institutes. Considering the natures of green technology-such as quasi-public-, this improvement would be helpful for SMEs which could create initial-marketplace and sales-references.

최근 우리나라를 비롯한 세계적 경제성장 패러다임은 녹색성장전략이다. 이에 따라 국가적으로 다양한 전략 및 지원정책이 수립되고 있으나, 중소기업의 역할과 기회를 반영한 정책은 미흡한 수준이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 중소기업 지원정책의 하나인 기술개발제품 공공구매제도의 현황을 살펴보고, 개선 방안을 제시하였다. 우선, 국내와 주요 선진국의 공공구매제도를 정책목적별, 공공구매 유형별로 포지션을 분석하였다. 이를 토대로 공공구매제도를 활용한 중소기업의 녹색성장전략 참여방안과 필요성을 도출하였다. 또한, 구매조건부 신제품개발사업 대상에 상용화 이전기술 및 제품을 포함하고 추가 R&D를 수행하는 방안을 제시하여, 녹색기술분야에서 중소기업의 기술혁신 역량 제고 및 정책지원이 필요함을 지적하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가과학기술위원회 (2009), 녹색기술 연구개발 종합대책, 제29회 국가과학기술위원회, 제3회 미래기획위원회, 제2호 안건, 국가과학기술위원회.
  2. 김종범 (2003), "김대중 정부의 중소기업정책의 공과와 지원체계 개선방향 : 중소기업정책의 성과와 과제", 한국정책학회 2003년도 특별기획 학술세미나 발표논문집-김대중 정부의 주요정책의 공과와 지원체계 개선방향, 한국정책학회, pp. 128-190.
  3. 김태황.송종국(2000), "기술혁신 지향적 정부구매제도의 정책방향", 기술경영경제학회 2000년도 제17회 하계학술발표회 논문집, 기술경영경제학회 학술대회, pp. 123-151.
  4. 송장준 (2004), 중소기업제품 공공구매제도 개선방안-대.중소기업 협력강화를 중심으로-, 중소기업연구원 기본연구 04-15, 중소기업연구원.
  5. 이윤재.강달원 (2001), "중소기업 기술정책의 거시경제적 효과분석:단체수의계약 및 중소기업 의무대출을 중심으로", 국제경제연구, 제7권, 제3호, pp. 227-250.
  6. 조병선.조봉현 (2009), "녹색성장 중소기업의 현황과 육성방안", 한국중소기업학회 200년도 춘계학술대회 발표자료집-한국경제의 희망 중소기업, 유동성 위기를 넘어 세계시장으로-, 한국중소기업학회, pp. 207-226.
  7. 조용현.홍운선 (2005), 중소기업지원 상용화기술개발사업 제도개선방안, 중소기업연구원 기본연구 05-20, 중소기업연구원.
  8. 중소기업청 (2007), 2007년 중소기업 기술통계조사 보고(I), 중소기업중앙회.
  9. 중소기업청 (2008), 중소기업제품 공공구매제도의 이해, 중소기업청.
  10. 중소기업청 (2009), 녹색성장을 위한 중소기업 지원전략, 중소기업청.
  11. 지식경제부 (2009), 산업기술혁신 5개년계획(2009-2013), 지식경제부.
  12. 홍석일 (2008), 중소기업 기술개발제품의 공공구매 현황과 과제, KIET 산업경제분석, 산업연구원.
  13. Alic, J., Branscomb, A., Brooks, L.M., Carter, H., Epstein, A. (1992), Beyond Spinoff. Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World, Boston.
  14. Aschhoff, B. and Sofka, W. (2008), Innovation on Demand-Can Public Procurement Drive Market Success of Innovations, ZEW.
  15. BMU (Bundesministerium fur Umwelt Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) (2006), O kologische Industriepolitik Memorandum fur einen 'New Deal' von Wirtschaft. Umwelt und Beschaftigung, Berlin.
  16. Bos, L. and Corvers, S.(2007), Pre-commercial public procurement-A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle-Public needs as a driver for innovation, Tijdschrift Aanbestedingsrecht in press.
  17. Directors Forum (National IST Research Directors Forum Working Group on Public Procurement) (2006), Pre-Commercial procurement of Innovation-A missing link in the European Innovation Cycle-, Brussels.
  18. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry, UK) (2003), Innovation Report-Competing in the Global Economy: The Innovation Challenge. London.
  19. DTI (Department of Trade and Industry, UK) (2006), Environmental Innovation: Bridging the Gap Between Environmental Necessity and Economic Opportunity (in Association with DEFRA), First Report of the Environmental Innovations Advisory Group, London.
  20. European Commission (2005), Public procurement for Research and Innovation-Developing procurement practices favorable to R&D and innovation, Brussels.
  21. European Commission (2006), Putting Knowledge into Practice: A Broad-based Innovation Strategy for the EU, Brussels.
  22. Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research (2006), Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake, European Commission.
  23. French, German, UK Governments (2004), Towards and innovative Europe.
  24. Geroski, P.A. (1990), "Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy", International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/758523673
  25. Jacob, E. (2006), Demand Oriented Innovation Policy, 2006 ProACT Conference, Finland.
  26. Jacob, E. and Luke, G. (2007), "Public procurement and innovation -Resurrecting the demand side's", Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003
  27. Kok Wim (2004), Facing the Challenge-The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment-Report from a High Level Group, European Communities, Luxembourg.
  28. Lena J. Tsipouri (2007), R&D and Innovation in public procurement in Europe, Conference-How to stimulate Innovation and R&D through Public Procurement.
  29. OCED (2004), Promoting Entrepreneurship And Innovative SMEs In A Global Economy: Towards A More Responsible And Inclusive Globalization.
  30. Palmberg, C. (2004), "The sources of innovations - looking beyond technological opportunities", Economics of Innovation and New Technology , Vol. 13, pp. 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590410001628143
  31. Rolfstam, M. (2005), "Public technology procurement as a demand-side innovation policy instrument - an overview of recent literature and events", Lund Institute of Technology, Lund[Online], Available: http://www.druid.dk/ocs/viewpaper.php?id=329&cf=2.
  32. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1981), "Government regulations andinnovation-industrial Innovation and Public Policy", Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, pp. 116-147.
  33. Rothwell, R. (1984), "Technology based small firms and regional innovation potential: the role of public procurement", Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 4, pp. 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00002774
  34. Saarinen, J. (2005), Innovations and industrial performance in Finland 1945-1998, Almqvist & Wicksell International.
  35. SEAF (Small Enterprise Assistance Fund, USA) (2004), The Development Impact of Small and Medium Enterprises: Lessons Learned from SEAF Investment, Small Enterprise Assistance Fund, Washington.
  36. Sven-Olof R. (2006), A Comprehensive approach to green public procurement in Sweden, Swedish environmental management council presentation at GPP Conference.
  37. Ulf Dahlsten (2006), Developing Lead Markets in ICT, European Commission