참고문헌
- Ballheim, C. (1999). How our readers feel about calculators. In Z.Usiskin(Ed.), Mathematics education dialogues(p. 4). Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Boers, M. A., & Jones, P. L. (1994). Students' use of graphics calculators under examination conditions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 25, 491-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739940250403
- Dahland, G., & Lingefjard, T. (1996). Graphing calculators and students'interpretations of results: A study in four upper secondary classes in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 4(2-3), 31-50.
- Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003905929557
- Drijvers, P., & Doorman, M. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education. J ournal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90027-9
- Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students' achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034795
- Fey, J. T., Heid, M. K., Good, R. A., Sheets, C., Blume, G. W., & Zbiek, R. M.(1995). Concepts in algebra: A technological approach. Dedham, MA:Janson Publications.
- Forster, P. A., & Mueller, U. (2001). Outcomes and implications of students' use of graphics calculators in the public examination of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science andTechnology, 32(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390116972
- Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004094013054
- Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195-227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009892720043
- Harskamp, E. G., Suhre, C. J. M., & van Streun, A. (2000). The graphics calculator and students' solution strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217073
- Hennessy, S., Fung, P., & Scanlon, E. (2001). The role of the graphic calculator in mediating graphing activity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32, 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010022176
- Hollar, J. C., & Norwood, K. (1999). The effects of a graphing-approach intermediate algebra curriculum on students' understanding of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 220-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/749612
- Hong, Y., Toham, M., & Kiernan, C. (2000). Supercalculators and university entrance calculus examinations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217092
- Keller, B. A., & Hirsch, C. R. (1998). Student preferences for representations of functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739980290101
- Mackey, K. (1999). Do we need calculators? In Z. Usiskin(Ed.),Mathematics education dialogues(p. 3). Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Merriweather, M., & Tharp, M. L. (1999). The effect of instruction with graphing calculators on how general mathematics students naturalistically solve algebraic problems. Journal of Compters in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(1), 7-22.
- Mitchelmore, M., & Cavanagh, M. (2000). Students' difficulties in operating a graphics calculator. Mathematics Education Research Journal,12(3), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217088
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2005). Technologysupported mathematics learning environments: Sixty-seventh yearbook.Reston, VA: NCTM
- Quesada, A. R., & Maxwell, M. E. (1994). The effects of using graphing calculators to enhance college students' performance in precalculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01278922
- Ruthven, K. (1990). The influence of graphic calculator use on translation from graphic to symbolic forms. Educational Studies in Mathematics,21(5), 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398862
- Schwarz, B. B., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). Prototypes: Brakes or levers in learning the function concept? The role of computer tools. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 362-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/749706
- Slavit, D. (1998). Three women's understandings of algebra in precalculus course integrated with the graphing calculator. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(3), 303-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80065-2
- Smith, B. A. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcomes from the use of calculators in mathematics education. (Texas A&M University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 787A.
- Texas Instruments (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice .Texas Instruments.
- Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2001). The effects of curriculum on achievement in second-year algebra: The example of the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 58-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/749621
- Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. (2000). Calculators in mathematics teaching and learning: Past, present, and future. In E. D. Laughbaum(Ed.),Hand-held technology in mathematics and science education: A collection of papers. The Ohio State University.
피인용 문헌
- Graph Art를 활용한 함수 지도에 관한 연구 - 울산 WISE 과학캠프활동을 중심으로 한 사례연구 - vol.51, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.3.197