Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF SAFETY OF AN OFFICE BLEACHING GEL CONTAINING 30% HYDROGEN PEROXIDE

30% 과산화수소를 함유한 전문가 미백제의 안전성 평가

  • Kim, Sin-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Park, Je-Uk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Hyen (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yang, Sung-Eun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea)
  • 김신영 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 치과보존과) ;
  • 박재억 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김창현 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 양성은 (가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원 치과보존과)
  • Received : 2010.04.21
  • Accepted : 2010.04.29
  • Published : 2010.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the safety of an office bleaching gel (RemeWhite, Remedent Inc., Deurle, Belgium) containing 30% hydrogen peroxide. 37 volunteers were received office bleaching with the RemeWhite for 3 times at one visit, total 2 visits. As control group, the same gel in which hydrogen peroxide was not included was applied to 34 volunteers with the same protocol. There was no difference between experimental group and control group using electric pulp test. In the result of gingival inflammation index and tooth sensitivity test, there was mild pain response in experimental group but it disappeared as time went by. Therefore, safety of the office bleaching gel containing 30% hydrogen peroxide was confirmed.

30% 과산화수소를 함유한 전문가 미백제인 레메화이트(Remewhite, Remedent Inc., Deurle, Belgium)를 시험군 피험자 37명, 시험용 미백제에서 과산화수소를 제외한 동일한 제재를 대조약으로 대조군 피험자 34명에게 1일 3회씩, 2차례에 걸쳐서 시행하였다. 미백의 임상적 안전성은 전기치수검사, 치은염증지수, 지각과민증, 이상반응, 활력징후 등을 통하여 평가하였다. 미백시행 직후, 14주 후, 26주 후에 평가하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 30% 과산화수소를 함유한 전문가 미백제를 임상적 적용시에 전기치수검사 결과에서는 미백 전후에 차이가 없었다. 치은염증지수, 지각과민증 평가 결과에서는 시험군에서 다소 경미한 통증 반응이 나타났으나 시간이 지나면서 사라지는 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 30% 과산화수소를 함유한 전문가 미백제를 사용하여 미백시에 임상적 안전성을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tredwin CJ, Naik S, Lewis NJ, Scully C. Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening (bleaching) products : review of adverse effects and safety issues. Br Dent J 8;200:371-6, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813423
  2. Leonard RH, Haywood VB, Phillips C. Risk factors for developing tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 28:527-34, 1997.
  3. Schulte JR, Morrissette DB, Gasior EJ, Czajewski MV. The effects of bleaching application time on the dental pulp. J Am Dent Assoc 125:1330-5, 1994. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0177
  4. Tam L. Clinical trial of three 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching products. J Can Dent Assoc 65:201-5, 1999.
  5. Cohen SC. Human pulpal response to bleaching procedures on vital teeth. J Endod 5:134-8, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80033-3
  6. Nathanson D, Parra C. Bleaching vital teeth-a review and clinical study. Compendium 8: 490-2, 494, 496-7, 1987.
  7. Martin JH, Bishop JC, Guentherman RH, Dorman HL. Cellular response of gingiva to prolonged application of dilute hyorogen peroxide. J Periodontol 39:208-10, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1968.39.4.208
  8. 김신영, 박재억, 김창현, 양성은. 30% 과산화수소를 함유한 전 문가 미백제의 효용성 평가. 대한치과보존학회지 35:40-50, 2010.
  9. 박은숙, 성소래, 홍성태, 김지은, 이소영, 황수연, 이신재, 진보 형, 손호현, 조병훈. 2.9% 과산화수소를 함유한 부착형 미백제 의 임상적 효능과 안정성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 31:269-281, 2006.
  10. Gurgan S, Cakir FY, Yazici E. Different light-activated in-office bleaching systems: a clinical evaluation. Lasers Med Sci, Epub, 2009.
  11. Munro IC, Williams GM, Heymann HO, Kroes R. Tooth whitening products and the risk of oral cancer. Food Chem Toxicol 44:301-15, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.07.012
  12. Naik S, Tredwin CJ, Scully C. Hydrogen peroxide tooth-whitening (bleaching) : review of safety in relation to possible carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol. 42:668-74, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.10.020
  13. Mahony C, Felter SP, McMillan DA. An exposurebased risk assessment approach to confirm the safety of hydrogen peroxide for use in home bleaching. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44;75-82, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.09.003
  14. Hsie AW, Recio L, Katz DS, Lee CQ, Wagner M, Schenley RL. Evidence for reactive oxygen species inducing mutations in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9616-20, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.24.9616
  15. Weitzman SA Weitberg AB, Stossel TP, Schwartz J, Shklar G. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on oral carcinogenesis in hamsters. J Periodontol 44:685-8.1986.
  16. Thitinanthapan W, Satamanont P, Vongsavan N. In vitro penetration of the pulp chamber by three brands of carbamide peroxide. J Esthet Dent 11:259-64, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00407.x
  17. Gokay O, Yilmaz F, Akin S, Tuncbilek M, Ertan R. Penetration of the pulp chamber by bleaching agents in teeth restored with various restorative materials. J Endod 26:92-4, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200002000-00008
  18. 박종현, 신혜진, 박덕영, 박세희, 김진우, 조경모. 미백보조광 조사가 치아미백의 효과에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보존학회지 34:95-102, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.2.095
  19. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 19:515-30, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90015-0
  20. Al Shethri S, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Zekonis R, Stropes M. A Clinical evaluation of two in-office bleaching products. Oper Dent 28:488-95, 2003.
  21. Zekonis R, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Al Shetri SE, Eckert GJ, Carlson TJ. Clinical evaluation of in-office and at-home bleaching treatments. Oper Dent 28:114-21, 2003.

Cited by

  1. Clinical assessment of whitening efficacy and safety of in-office tooth whitening system containing 15% hydrogen peroxide with or without light activation vol.36, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.4.306