유해산출물을 고려한 서울시 간선버스노선의 효율성 평가

Evaluation of Efficiency in the Seoul's Arterial Bus Routes Considering Undesirable Outputs

  • 투고 : 2010.06.22
  • 심사 : 2010.09.30
  • 발행 : 2010.10.31

초록

본 연구에서는 현행 버스 서비스 평가체계를 보완하고 선행연구에 비해 합리적인 분석결과를 도출하기 위해 유익 유해산출물을 모두 반영한 수정 BCC 모형을 이용하여 2009년 서울시 113개 간선버스노선의 효율성을 추정하였다. 분석대상은 총 보유비와 총 가동비, 중앙차로 정류장수 비율과 타노선과의 중복길이를 사용하여 유익산출물인 총 승객수와 서비스 만족도 점수, 그리고 유해산출물인 CO2 배출량을 산출하는 형태로 상정하였다. 분석결과 유해산출물을 함께 반영한 모형이 유익산출물만을 반영한 모형에 비해 합리적인 결과를 도출하는 것으로 나타났다. 서울시 간선버스노선은 총 보유비와 총 가동비, 그리고 타노선과의 중복길이를 평균적으로 약 10% 감소할 수 있으며, 중앙차로 정류장수 비율은 약 160% 증가시킬 수 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 한편 효율성에 영향을 미치는 결정요인을 분석하기 위한 토빗회귀분석을 수행한 결과 총 보유비와 중앙차로 정류장수 비율이 통계적으로 유의미성을 확보하였다.

In order to improve the existing evaluation system of bus services and gain more reasonable analysis outputs, the authors evaluate the efficiency of 113 arterial bus routes in Seoul in 2009 using a modified BCC model considering not only desirable outputs but also undesirable outputs. Each Decision Making Unit (DMU) is assumed to use inputs such as possession costs, operating costs, the ratios of median bus stops overlapped route lengths to produce estimates of desirable outputs (the number of passengers and service satisfaction score) and undesirable outputs (CO2 emissions). According to the analysis, the modified BCC model considering both desirable outputs and undesirable outputs shows more appropriate results. DMUs would be more efficient on average to reduce nearly 10% of the 3 inputs (possession costs, operating costs, and overlapped route lengths) and increase by about 160% the ratios of median bus stops. Also, a Tobit regression analysis is conducted to identify the most effective variables for maximum efficiency and discover that the variable of possession costs and the ratios of median bus stops are statistically significant.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김성수.오미영.김민정(2002), "자료포락분석기법(DEA)을 이용한 서울 시내버스운송업의 효율성과 규모의 경제성 분석", 환경논총, 제40호, pp101-113.
  2. 오미영.김성수.김민정(2002), "자료포락분석기법(DEA)을 이용한 서울 시내버스운송업의 효율성 분석", 대한교통학회지, 제20권 제2호, 대한교통학회, pp.59-68.
  3. 최인영(2004), "서울시내버스 운송업체의 효율성과 생산성 변화(1996-2000)에 관한 연구", 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문.
  4. 오미영.김성수(2005), "서울의 대중교통체계 개편에 따른 시내버스업체의 생산성 변화", 대한교통학회지, 제23권 제7호, 대한교통학회, pp.53-61.
  5. 오미영(2008), "서울의 대중교통체계 개편에 따른 시내버스업체의 생산성에 관한 연구 : 사고비용을 포함한 자료포락분석기법을 인용하여", 서울대학교 환경대학원 박사학위논문.
  6. 한진석.김혜란.고승영(2009), "자료포락분석을 이용한 서울시 간선버스노선 효율성 평가", 대한교통학회지, 제27권 제6호, 대한교통학회, pp.45-53.
  7. Ali, A.I., L.M. Seiford(1990), "Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis", Operational Research Letters 9, pp.403-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(90)90061-9
  8. Tone, K. and Sawada, T.(1991), "An Efficiency analysis of public versus private bus transportation enterprises", In: Twelfth IFROS International Conferences on Operational Research, pp.357-365.
  9. Xuehao Chu and Gordon J. Fielding and Bruce W. Lamar(1992), "Measuring Transit Performance using Data Envelopment Analysis", Transportation Research A, Vol. 26A, No. 3, pp.223-230.
  10. R. Levaggi(1994), "Parametric and Non Parametric Approach to Efficiency: The Case of Urban Transport in Italy", Studi- Economici 49 (53), pp.67-88.
  11. Obeng. K(1994), "The Economic Cost of Subsidy-Induced Technical Inefficiency", International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.3-20.
  12. Kerstens, K.(1996), "Technical Efficiency Measurement and Explanation of French Urban Transit Companies", Transportation Research A, Vol. 30, pp.431-452.
  13. Kerstens, K.(1999), "Decomposing Technical Efficiency and Effectiveness of French Urban Transport", Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, (54), pp.129-155.
  14. Nolan, J. F.(1996), "Determinants of Productive Efficincy in Urban Transit", Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 32, pp.319-342.
  15. Viton, P. A.(1997), "Technical Efficiency in Multi-mode Bus Transit: A Production Frontier Analysis", Transportation research B, Vol. 31, pp.23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00019-7
  16. Viton, P. A.(1998), "Changes in Multi-mode Bus Transit Efficiency, 1998-1992", Transportation, Vol. 25, pp.1-21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004906024774
  17. Cowie, J. and Asenova, D.(1999), "Organization Form, Scale Effects and Efficiency in the British Bus Industry", Transportation, Vol. 26, pp.231-248.
  18. N. Husain, M. Abdullah and S. Kuman(2000), "Evaluating public sector efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA): a case study in road transport department, Selangor, Malyasia, Total Quality Management 11 (2000) (4/5), pp.S830-S836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120050008282
  19. Carotenuto et al.(2001), "Public Transportation Agencies Performance: an Evaluation Approach Based on Data Envelope Analysis", NECTAR Conference no European Startegies in The Globalising Markets; Transport Innovations, Competitiveness and Sustainability in the Information Age, 16-18 May 2001, Espoo, Finland.
  20. Nolan, J. F., Ritchie, P. C. and Rowcroft, J. R.(2001), "Measuring Efficiency in the Public Sector Using Non-parametric Frontier Estimator: A Study of Transit Agencies in the USA", Applied Economics, Vol. 33, pp.913-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840122663
  21. James Odeck and Abdulrahim Alkadi(2001), "Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis, Transportation 28, pp.211-232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010333518966
  22. Maria P. Boile(2001), "Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencys of Public Transit Systems, Journal of Transportation Engineering, pp.187-194.
  23. Vicente Pina, Lourdes Torres(2001), "Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery. An application to urban public transport", Transportation Research Part A 35, pp.929-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00034-5
  24. Jonathan Cowie(2002), "Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: an analysis of the British bus industry", Transport Reviews, Vol. 22, no. 2, pp.147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/014416400110076267
  25. Seiford L. M., Joe Zhu(2002), "Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation", European Journal of Operational Research, 142, pp.16-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4
  26. Matthew G. Karlaftis(2003), "Investigating transit production and performance a programming approach", Transportation Research Part A 37, pp.225-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(02)00009-7
  27. Matthew G. Karlaftis(2004), "A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems", European Journal of Operational Research 152, pp.352-364.
  28. Triantis, K. P.(2004), "Engineering applications of DEA. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seifor, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis", Kluwer Academic Publications, pp.401-441.
  29. Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas(2006), "Assessing Performance under Regulatory Evolution: A European Transit System Perspective", JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, pp.226-234.
  30. James Odeck(2008), "The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services", Transportation Research Part A 42, pp.696-708.
  31. Breno Ramos Sampaio, Oswaldo Lima Neto, Yony Sampaio(2008), "Efficiency analysis of public transport systems: Lessons for institutional planning", Transportation Research Part A 42, pp.445-454.
  32. Tandon, S. (2006), "Performance Measurement of Bus Routes using Data Envelopment Analysis", Thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
  33. Darold T. Barnum, Sonali Tandon, and Sue McNeil, P. E., M.ASCE(2008), "Comparing the Performance of bus Routes after Adjusting for the Environment Using Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of Transportation Engineering, pp.77-85.
  34. Yong Lao and Lin Liu(2009), "Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems", Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 33, pp.247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.01.005