Effect of Cryopreservation of Sibling 2PN Zygotes on Cumulative Delivery Rates in the Human IVF-ET Program

전핵 시기에서의 수정란 동결이 체외수정 및 배아이식술에서의 누적 분만율에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Myo-Kyung (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Hee (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Su-Jin (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Won (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dong-Wook (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Chun-Kyu (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Song, In-Ok (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hyoung-Song (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University School of Medicine)
  • 김묘경 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 이선희 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 최수진 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 최혜원 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 박동욱 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 임천규 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 송인옥 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 산부인과) ;
  • 이형송 (관동대학교 의과대학 제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실)
  • Received : 2010.11.29
  • Accepted : 2010.12.22
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

Objective: This study was carried out to know whether cryopreservation of sibling 2PN zygotes could increase the cumulative delivery rates in the patients who had less than 10 fertilized zygotes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 138 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles with less than 10 fertilized zygotes during January 2003 to December 2007 in Cheil General Hospital. These cycles were divided into two groups. In Group I (n=86), all fertilized embryos were cultured to transfer on day 3 without cryopreserved embryos at the 2PN stage. In Group II (n=52), among fertilized zygotes, some sibling zygotes were frozen at the 2PN stage, the remainder were cultured to transfer. Clinical outcomes in fresh ET cycles and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates after subsequent frozen-thawed (FT)-ET cycles were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in female mean age, number of retrieved oocytes and total fertilized embryos between two groups, Number of cultured embryos was significantly lower in Group II ($5.2{\pm}0.5$) than in Group I ($8.4{\pm}0.7$) (p<0.01). Also, number of transferred embryos was significantly lower in Group II ($3.3{\pm}0.6$) compared with Group I ($3.6{\pm}0.6$) (p<0.01). ${\beta}$-hCG positive rates and delivery rates (51.2 vs. 46.2 % and 41.9 vs. 34.6 %, respectively) after fresh ET were slightly higher in Group I than in Group II. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Also, the cumulative delivery rates after subsequent FT-ET cycles were not significantly different between Group I (48.8%) and Group II (50.0%). Conclusion: This study showed that cryopreservation of sibling 2PN zygotes from patients who had less than 10 zygotes in the fresh ET cycles did not increase cumulative delivery outcomes. But, it could provide an alternative choice for patients due to offering more chance for embryo transfers if pregnancy was failed in fresh IVF-ET cycles.

목적: 본 연구에서는 10개 이하의 2PN 접합자를 얻은 환자군에서 전핵 단계 배아의 동결보관이 누적 분만율을 증가시키는 지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구방법: 2003년 1월부터 2007년 12월까지 제일병원 아이소망센터를 내원하여 과배란 유도에 의해 체외수정 및 배아이식술을 시행한 주기를 후향적으로 비교 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 일반적 체외수정법 또는 세포질내 정자주입술을 이용하여 수정을 시도한 후 20~22시간에 8개의 수정란을 확인하거나, 또는 전핵이 1개만 보이는 접합자와 발달지연 배아를 포함하여 수정란이 10개 미만인 138주기의 체외수정 및 배아이식 주기를 대상으로 분석하였다. 분석대상을 두 군으로 나누었으며 그룹 I (n=86)은 배아의 동결 없이 모든 수정란을 배양하여 3일째 이식한 군으로 하였으며, 그룹 II (n=52)는 전핵 시기에 일부 수정란을 동결하고 나머지를 배양하여 3일째 이식한 군으로 분류하였다. 두 군간 신선배아 이식주기와 그 다음 동결-해동 이식주기 후의 임상적 임신율과 누적 임신율을 각각 비교하였다. 결과: 비교 대상군 사이에 여성의 평균 나이, 획득 난자의 수 및 수정란의 수에서는 통계적 차이를 보이지 않았다. 배양된 배아의 수는 그룹 II ($5.2{\pm}0.5$)가 그룹 I $8.4{\pm}0.7$)에 비하여 유의하게 적었다 (p<0.01). 또한 이식한 배아의 수 역시 그룹 II ($3.3{\pm}0.6$)가 그룹 I ($3.6{\pm}0.6$)에 비하여 통계적으로 유의하게 적었다 (p<0.01). 신선주기 배아이식에서 ${\beta}$-hCG 양성을 보인 환자 수와 분만을 한 환자의 수는 그룹 I이 그룹 II에 비하여 약간 높은 양상을 보였다 (51.2 vs. 46.2% and 41.9 vs. 34.6%). 동결-해동 배아이식 후 누적 분만율을 비교하였을 때 그룹 I (48.8%)과 그룹 II (50.0%)에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 관찰할 수 없었다. 결론: 적은 수의 수정란을 얻은 환자군에서 일부 전핵 단계에서의 동결보관이 누적 분만율을 향상 시키는 효과를 확인할 수 없었다. 그러나 일부 수정란의 동결보관은 해당 신선주기에서 임신에 실패하였을 경우 환자에게 추가적인 배아이식 기회를 제공해 줄 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있는 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Schnorr JA, Doviak MJ, Muasher SJ, Jones HW Jr. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2001; 75: 147-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01661-7
  2. Tiitinen A, Husa LM, Tulppala M, Simberg N, Seppala M. The effect of cryopreservation in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 326-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09140.x
  3. Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2316-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2316
  4. Kim MK, Choi SJ, Choi HW, Bang KH, Kim HO, Yang KM, et al. Pregnancy and implantation rates related to serm estradiol concentration of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in fresh IVF-ET and frozen-thawed ET cycles. Korean J Reprod Med 2007; 34: 197-205.
  5. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115 Suppl 1: S106-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.022
  6. Senn A, Vozzi C, Chanson A, De Grandi P, Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 946-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01603-4
  7. Salumets A, Tuuri T, Makinen S, Vilska S, Husu L, Tainio R, et al. Effect of developmental stage of embryo at freezing on pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1890-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg339
  8. Surrey E, Keller J, Stevens J, Gustofson R, Minjarez D, Schoolcraft W. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21: 411-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.008
  9. Choi SJ, Lee SH, Song IO, Koong MK, Kang IS, Jun JH. Efficacy of frozen-thawed ET in patients with old age or non-pregnant in fresh ET cycles. Korean J Fertil Steril. 2006; 33: 237-43.
  10. Anderson AR, Weikert ML, Crain JL. Determining the most optimal stage for embryo cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8: 207-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60517-2
  11. Dowling-Lacey D, Mayer JF, Jones E, Bocca S, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Live birth from a frozen-thawed pronuclear stage embryo almost 20 years after its cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. In press 2010.
  12. Veeck LL, Amundson CH, Brothman LJ, DeScisciolo C, Maloney MK, Muasher SJ, et al. Significantly enhanced pregnancy rates per cycle through cryopreservation and thaw of pronuclear stage oocytes. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1202-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55977-9
  13. Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1318-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.5.1318
  14. Stern JE, Goldman MB, Hatasaka H, MacKenzie TA, Surrey ES, Racowsky C. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 767-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.051
  15. Veeck LL. Does the developmental stage at freeze impact on clinical results post-thaw? Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 6: 367-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61859-7
  16. Gabrielsen A, Fedder J, Agerholm I. Parameters predicting the implantation rate of thawed IVF/ICSI embryos: a retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12: 70-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60983-2
  17. Lin YP, Cassidenti DL, Chacon RR, Soubra SS, Rosen GF, Yee B. Successful implantation of frozen sibling embryos is influenced by the outcome of the cycle from which they were derived. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 262-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57352-X
  18. Schalkoff ME, Oskowitz SP, Powers RD. A multifactorial analysis of the pregnancy outcome in a successful embryo cryopreservation program. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1070-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55930-5
  19. Urman B, Balaban B, Yakin K. Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed human embryos. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 310-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.034
  20. Prades M, Golmard JL, Vauthier D, Lefebvre G, Poirot C. Can cumulative pregnancy rates be increased by freezing and thawing single embryos? Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.074
  21. Horne G, Critchlow JD, Newman MC, Edozien L, Matson PL, Lieberman BA. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 542-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.3.542
  22. Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 84-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00438-X
  23. Malizia BA, Hacker MR, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 236-43. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0803072
  24. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2392-402. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041032