The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of Live Fluoroscopy to Detect Intravascular Injection During Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections

  • Lee, Min-Hye (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Kyung-Seung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hoon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Hyun-Do (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Su-Jin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Dong-Eon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2009.11.25
  • Accepted : 2009.12.24
  • Published : 2010.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Complications following lumbar transforaminal epidural injection are frequently related to inadvertent vascular injection of corticosteroids. Several methods have been proposed to reduce the risk of vascular injection. The generally accepted technique during epidural steroid injection is intermittent fluoroscopy. In fact, this technique may miss vascular uptake due to rapid washout. Because of the fleeting appearance of vascular contrast patterns, live fluoroscopy is recommended during contrast injection. However, when vascular contrast patterns are overlapped by expected epidural patterns, it is hard to distinguish them even on live fluoroscopy. Methods: During 87 lumbar transforaminal epidural injections, dynamic contrast flows were observed under live fluoroscopy with using digital subtraction enhancement. Two dynamic fluoroscopy fluoroscopic images were saved from each injection. These injections were performed by five physicians with experience independently. Accuracy of live fluoroscopy was determined by comparing the interpretation of the digital subtraction fluoroscopic images. Results: Using digital subtraction guidance with contrast confirmation, the twenty cases of intravascular injection were found (the rate of incidence was 23%). There was no significant difference in incidence of intravascular injections based either on gender or diagnosis. Only five cases of intravascular injections were predicted with either flash or aspiration of blood (sensitivity = 25%). Under live fluoroscopic guidance with contrast confirmation to predict intravascular injection, twelve cases were predicted (sensitivity = 60%). Conclusions: This finding demonstrate that digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging is superior to blood aspiration or live fluoroscopy in detecting intravascular injections with lumbar transforaminal epidural injection.

Keywords

References

  1. Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz. DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: evidence based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10: 7-111.
  2. Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 233-51.
  3. Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis: a clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 129: 61-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197711000-00006
  4. Wheeler AH, Murrey DB. Chronic lumbar spine and radicular pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2002; 6: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-002-0005-x
  5. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1261-70. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20910
  6. Yamashita M, Ohtori S, Koshi T, Inoue G, Yamauchi K, Suzuki M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the nucleus pulposus mediates radicular pain, but not increase of inflammatory peptide, associated with nerve damage in mice. Spine 2008; 33: 1836-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bab2a
  7. Botwin KP, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CG, Torres-Ramos FM, Freeman TL, Slaten WK. Complications of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1045-50. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.7166
  8. Kennedy DJ, Dreyfuss P, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. Paraplegia following image-guided transforaminal lumbar spine epidural steroid injection: two case reports. Pain Med 2009; 10: 1389-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00728.x
  9. Bogduk N, Dreyfuss P, Baker R, Yin W, Landers M, Hammer M, et al. Complications of spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures. Pain Med 2008; 9: S11-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00437.x
  10. Houten JK, Errico TJ. Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block: report of three cases. Spine J 2002; 2: 70-5.
  11. McLain RF, Fry M, Hecht ST. Transient paralysis associated with epidural steroid injection. J Spinal Disord 1997; 10: 441-4.
  12. Reitman CA, Watters W 3rd. Subdural hematoma after cervical epidural steroid injection. Spine 2002; 27: E174-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203150-00022
  13. Baker R, Dreyfuss P, Mercer S, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain 2003; 103: 211-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00343-3
  14. Smuck M, Fuller BJ, Chiodo A, Benny B, Singaracharlu B, Tong H, et al. Accuracy of intermittent fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injections. Spine 2008; 33: E205-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816054d9
  15. Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O'Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine 2003; 28: 21-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00007
  16. Smuck M, Fuller BJ, Yoder B, Huerta J. Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections. Spine J 2007; 7: 79-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.380
  17. Jasper JF. Is digital subtraction fluoroscopy a useful tool for the interventional pain physician? Pain Physician 2002; 5: 36-9.
  18. Jasper JF. Role of digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging in detecting intravascular injections. Pain Physician 2003; 6: 369-72.
  19. Batson OV. The vertebral vein system. Caldwell lecture, 1956. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1957; 78: 195-212.
  20. Tiso RL, Cutler T, Catania JA, Whalen K. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: the role of corticosteroids. Spine J 2004; 4: 468-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2003.10.007
  21. Breslin DS, Martin G, Macleod DB, D'ercole F, Grant SA. Central nervous system toxicity following the administration of levobupivacaine for lumbar plexus block: a report of two cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 144-7.
  22. Kim DW, Shim JC. Incidence of intravascular penetration during transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injection. Korean J Pain 2007; 20: 26-30. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2007.20.1.26
  23. Karasek M, Bogduk N. Temporary neurologic deficit after cervical transforaminal injection of local anesthetic. Pain Med 2004; 5: 202-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04028.x
  24. Stretanski MF, Chopko B. Unintentional vascular uptake in fluoroscopically guided, contrast confirmed spinal injections: a 1-yr clinical experience and discussion of findings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 30-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHM.0000150791.90086.3A
  25. Barbey MM, Farber A, Marienhoff N, Gmelin E. Digital subtraction angiography with carbon dioxide-basic principles, technique and clinical application. Vasa 1999; 28: 243-9. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526.28.4.243

Cited by

  1. Incidence of intravascular insertion in thoracic epidural catheterization by using real time fluoroscopy vol.62, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2012.62.3.251
  2. A Comparison of Quincke and Whitacre Needles with Respect to Risk of Intravascular Uptake in S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections vol.117, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a6d1bd
  3. Rates of lumbosacral transforaminal injections interpreted as intravascular: fluoroscopy alone or with digital subtraction vol.68, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12362
  4. Advantages of Digital Subtraction Angiography During Nerve Block vol.4, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.19927
  5. Comparison of incidence of intravascular injections during transforaminal epidural steroid injection using different needle types vol.67, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.3.193
  6. Safeguards to Prevent Neurologic Complications after Epidural Steroid Injections vol.122, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000614
  7. Detection Rate of Intravascular Injections during Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: A Comparison of Digital Subtraction Angiography and Static Images from Conventional Fluoroscopy vol.28, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.105
  8. Incidence of intravascular injection and the spread of contrast media during S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection by two approaches: anteroposterior vs oblique vol.70, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13079
  9. Do We Have an Alternative to Transforaminal Injections to Provide Safe and Effective Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections to Our Patients While Minimizing the Burden to the Healthcare System? vol.124, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000926
  10. In Reply vol.124, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000929
  11. Real-Time Detection of Periforaminal Vessels in the Cervical Spine vol.41, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000363
  12. Impact of Type of Needle on Incidence of Intravascular Injection During Diagnostic Lumbar Medial Branch Block vol.41, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000381
  13. Optical signature of nerve tissue-Exploratory ex vivo study comparing optical, histological, and molecular characteristics of different adipose and nerve tissues vol.50, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22938
  14. Distribution Patterns of the Vulnerable Vessels Around Cervical Nerve Roots vol.97, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000825
  15. Effect of needle type on intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injection: a meta-analysis vol.32, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2019.32.1.39
  16. The effectiveness of volume versus concentration of the epidural steroid injections through transforaminal approach vol.27, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2011.01.004
  17. Epidural Steroid Injection Warning & Safety Recommendations vol.2, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2015.02.00069
  18. Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection vol.2017, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802
  19. A clinical retrospective study comparing thoracic epidural catheterization between awake and anesthetized patients vol.14, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2019.14.1.95
  20. Digital subtraction angiography vs. real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural block vol.36, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00122
  21. Distribution Patterns of Vasculature Around Cervical Nerve Roots vol.11, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.09.028
  22. Epidural corticosteroid injections: Still credible? vol.86, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2019.03.001
  23. Comparison between anteroposterior and oblique “Scotty dog” approach during S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection : A randomized controlled trial vol.99, pp.43, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000022895
  24. Differential rates of intravascular uptake and pain perception during lumbosacral epidural injection among adults using a 22-gauge needle versus 25-gauge needle: a randomized clinical trial vol.20, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01137-0