Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2010.23.1.18

Accuracy of Live Fluoroscopy to Detect Intravascular Injection During Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections  

Lee, Min-Hye (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Yang, Kyung-Seung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Kim, Young-Hoon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Jung, Hyun-Do (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Lim, Su-Jin (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Moon, Dong-Eon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Pain / v.23, no.1, 2010 , pp. 18-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Complications following lumbar transforaminal epidural injection are frequently related to inadvertent vascular injection of corticosteroids. Several methods have been proposed to reduce the risk of vascular injection. The generally accepted technique during epidural steroid injection is intermittent fluoroscopy. In fact, this technique may miss vascular uptake due to rapid washout. Because of the fleeting appearance of vascular contrast patterns, live fluoroscopy is recommended during contrast injection. However, when vascular contrast patterns are overlapped by expected epidural patterns, it is hard to distinguish them even on live fluoroscopy. Methods: During 87 lumbar transforaminal epidural injections, dynamic contrast flows were observed under live fluoroscopy with using digital subtraction enhancement. Two dynamic fluoroscopy fluoroscopic images were saved from each injection. These injections were performed by five physicians with experience independently. Accuracy of live fluoroscopy was determined by comparing the interpretation of the digital subtraction fluoroscopic images. Results: Using digital subtraction guidance with contrast confirmation, the twenty cases of intravascular injection were found (the rate of incidence was 23%). There was no significant difference in incidence of intravascular injections based either on gender or diagnosis. Only five cases of intravascular injections were predicted with either flash or aspiration of blood (sensitivity = 25%). Under live fluoroscopic guidance with contrast confirmation to predict intravascular injection, twelve cases were predicted (sensitivity = 60%). Conclusions: This finding demonstrate that digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging is superior to blood aspiration or live fluoroscopy in detecting intravascular injections with lumbar transforaminal epidural injection.
Keywords
digital subtraction image; epidural injection; fluoroscopy; intravascular injection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Botwin KP, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CG, Torres-Ramos FM, Freeman TL, Slaten WK. Complications of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal lumbar epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1045-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O'Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine 2003; 28: 21-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Karasek M, Bogduk N. Temporary neurologic deficit after cervical transforaminal injection of local anesthetic. Pain Med 2004; 5: 202-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tiso RL, Cutler T, Catania JA, Whalen K. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: the role of corticosteroids. Spine J 2004; 4: 468-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Breslin DS, Martin G, Macleod DB, D'ercole F, Grant SA. Central nervous system toxicity following the administration of levobupivacaine for lumbar plexus block: a report of two cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 144-7.
6 Kim DW, Shim JC. Incidence of intravascular penetration during transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injection. Korean J Pain 2007; 20: 26-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Smuck M, Fuller BJ, Chiodo A, Benny B, Singaracharlu B, Tong H, et al. Accuracy of intermittent fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injections. Spine 2008; 33: E205-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Stretanski MF, Chopko B. Unintentional vascular uptake in fluoroscopically guided, contrast confirmed spinal injections: a 1-yr clinical experience and discussion of findings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 30-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Barbey MM, Farber A, Marienhoff N, Gmelin E. Digital subtraction angiography with carbon dioxide-basic principles, technique and clinical application. Vasa 1999; 28: 243-9.   DOI
10 Baker R, Dreyfuss P, Mercer S, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain 2003; 103: 211-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Smuck M, Fuller BJ, Yoder B, Huerta J. Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections. Spine J 2007; 7: 79-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Jasper JF. Is digital subtraction fluoroscopy a useful tool for the interventional pain physician? Pain Physician 2002; 5: 36-9.
13 Jasper JF. Role of digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging in detecting intravascular injections. Pain Physician 2003; 6: 369-72.
14 Batson OV. The vertebral vein system. Caldwell lecture, 1956. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1957; 78: 195-212.
15 Kennedy DJ, Dreyfuss P, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. Paraplegia following image-guided transforaminal lumbar spine epidural steroid injection: two case reports. Pain Med 2009; 10: 1389-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bogduk N, Dreyfuss P, Baker R, Yin W, Landers M, Hammer M, et al. Complications of spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures. Pain Med 2008; 9: S11-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Houten JK, Errico TJ. Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block: report of three cases. Spine J 2002; 2: 70-5.
18 Marshall LL, Trethewie ER, Curtain CC. Chemical radiculitis: a clinical, physiological and immunological study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 129: 61-7.   DOI
19 McLain RF, Fry M, Hecht ST. Transient paralysis associated with epidural steroid injection. J Spinal Disord 1997; 10: 441-4.
20 Reitman CA, Watters W 3rd. Subdural hematoma after cervical epidural steroid injection. Spine 2002; 27: E174-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Wheeler AH, Murrey DB. Chronic lumbar spine and radicular pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2002; 6: 97-105.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician 2009; 12: 233-51.
23 Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR. The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1261-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Yamashita M, Ohtori S, Koshi T, Inoue G, Yamauchi K, Suzuki M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the nucleus pulposus mediates radicular pain, but not increase of inflammatory peptide, associated with nerve damage in mice. Spine 2008; 33: 1836-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz. DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: evidence based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10: 7-111.