The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Adequate Entry Angle of Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglion Block in Korean

  • Kim, Won-Ho (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Kwon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Chul-Joong (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Seoul Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyeong (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Seoul Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Sim, Woo-Seok (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Seoul Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2009.09.04
  • Accepted : 2009.12.07
  • Published : 2010.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The target of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block is the anterolateral surface of the L2, 3 and 4 vertebral bodies, where the lumbar sympathetic ganglion usually lies. In most cases, a block-needle is inserted approximately 5-8 cm lateral to spinous process on the skin and directed to the anterolateral surface of vertebral body obliquely. The purpose of this study is to determine the safe entry angle and entry point in Korean by using the abdominal CT scan images. Methods: The abdominal CT images of eighty five patients were recruited to this study. The minimal angle aimed at the lumbar sympathetic ganglion that can pass through the lateral aspect of body and maximal angle that avoids puncturing the kidney, ureter or retroperitoneal space were measured. The distance from midline to skin entry point was also measured. Results: There was no significant difference in entry angle among L2, 3, and 4 level. The entry angle was similar in the right and left side, and in males and females. The entry angle of old age group was significantly smaller than that of young age group. The calculated safe entry angle was $30.5{\pm}0.4^{\circ}$ and entry point was $7.7{\pm}0.2\;cm$ and $6.7{\pm}0.1\;cm$ lateral from midline in males and females respectively. Conclusions: These measurements can be used as a reference for lumbar sympathetic ganglion block and radiofrequency lesioning. Prior to performing the lumbar sympathetic ganglion block for cancer patients, the abdominal CT scan should be reviewed to prevent complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Boas RA. Sympathetic nerve blocks: in search of a role. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 292-305.
  2. Stanton-Hicks M. Complications of sympathetic blocks for extremity pain. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 2007; 11: 148-51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.trap.2007.05.007
  3. Niv D, Gofeld M. Lumbar sympathetic blocks. In: Interventional pain management. 2nd ed. Edited by Raj PP. Philiadelphia, WB Saunders Co. 2008, pp 303-21.
  4. Shim JC. Nerve blocks in lumbar region. In: Pain medicine. 3rd ed. Edited by The Korean Pain Society. Seoul, Koonja Publishing Inc. 2007, pp 643-6.
  5. Waldman SD. Atlas of interventional pain management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co. 2004, pp 308-12.
  6. Buckley FP. Regional anesthesia with local anesthetics. In: Bonica's management of pain. 3rd ed. Edited by Loeser JD, Butler SH, Chapman CR, Turk DC. Philadelphia, Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins. 2001, pp 1935-8.
  7. Rocco AG, Palombi D, Raeke D. Anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic chain. Reg Anesth 1995; 20: 13-9.
  8. Middleton WJ, Chan VWS. Lumbar sympathetic block: A review of complications. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 1998; 2: 137-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-208X(98)80023-2
  9. Snodgrass JJ. Sex differences and aging of the vertebral column. J Forensic Sci 2004; 49: 458-63.
  10. Lexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995;50:11-6.
  11. Dirim A, Kumsar S. Iatrogenic ureteral injury due to lumbar sympathetic block. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008; 42: 395-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590801966911
  12. Kumarov IW, Maclsaac SG, Sioufi J, DeDomenico I. Iatrogenic ureteral injury secondary to lumbar sympathetic ganglion blockade. Urology 1980; 16: 617-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(80)90574-9
  13. Cutts S, Williams HT, Lee J, Downing R. Ureteric injury as a complication of chemical sympathectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 19: 212-3. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1999.0998
  14. Wheatley JK, Montamedi F, Hammonds WD. Page kidney resulting from massive subcapsular hematoma. Complication of lumbar sympathetic nerve block. Urology 1984; 24: 361-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(84)90212-7
  15. Seo MS, Lee PB, Sim WS, Park SY, Kim YC, Lee SC. A review of insertion site for lumbar sympathetic ganglion block. Korean J Anesthesiol 2004; 47: 698-702. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2004.47.5.698

Cited by

  1. Trajectory avoiding kidney and ureter injury for percutaneous lumbar sympathetic block vol.67, pp.Suppl, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.S.S120
  2. Neural Ablation and Regeneration in Pain Practice vol.29, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.3
  3. Clinical Identification of the Vertebral Level at Which the Lumbar Sympathetic Ganglia Aggregate vol.29, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.2.103
  4. A brief report on a technical description of ultrasound-guided lumbar sympathetic block vol.30, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2017.30.1.66
  5. The Optimal Approach for a Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block pp.15307085, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12603
  6. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Case Series and Technical Report on a Novel Lead Configuration pp.10947159, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12801
  7. The Contribution of Sympathetic Mechanisms to Postamputation Phantom and Residual Limb Pain: A Pilot Study vol.12, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.01.009
  8. The Effect of Sedation on the Accuracy and Treatment Outcomes for Diagnostic Injections: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Study vol.15, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12389