방사성폐기물학회지 (Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT))

  • 제8권4호
  • /
  • Pages.269-277
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1738-1894(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5471(eISSN)
한국방사성폐기물학회 (Korean Radioactive Waste Society)
권호 표지

후행 핵연료주기의 다자 방안 분석

Multilateral Approaches to the Back-end of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Challenges and Possibilities

  • 투고 : 2010.04.26
  • 심사 : 2010.12.07
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

원자력의 중흥기를 맞이하여 민감한 핵연료주기 기술의 무분별한 확장을 억제하고자 다양한 핵연료주기 다자 방안이 제시되고 있다. 현재 원자력 공급국 위주의 핵연료주기 다자화가 추진되고 있는 실정에서 후행 핵연료주기 기술의 다자화 추진 추이를 파악하고자 사용후핵연료 공동 관리 시설에 대한 분석 결과를 검토하였다. 또한 후행 핵연료주기 연구개발 시설의 다자화를 제안하고 기대효과와 문제점을 검토한 후 이를 실현하기 위한 추진방안을 도출하였다.

Various multilateral approaches to the nuclear fuel cycle have been proposed in order to suppress the expansion of sensitive fuel cycle technology. In order to prepare for the future multilaterallization of the nuclear fuel cycle, existing multilateral spent fuel management programs are analyzed. A trial multilateralization of a domestic R&D facility for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle is proposed and its challenges, possibilities and implementation strategy are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. V. Meckoni, R.J. Catlin and L.L. Bennett, Regional Nuclear Fuel Cycle Centres: IAEA Study Project, IAEA-CN-36/487 (1977).
  2. IAEA, Expert Group on International Plutonium Storage: Report to the Director General, IAEAIPS/ EG/140, Rev.2 (1982).
  3. IAEA, Final Report of the Expert Group on International Spent Fuel Management, IAEAISFM/ EG/26, Rev.1 (1982).
  4. IAEA, Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Vienna (2005).
  5. Y. Yudin, Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (2009).
  6. International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament Report, Eliminating Nuclear Threats: A Practical Agenda for Global Policymakers, pp.132-145, ICNND, Canberra/Tokyo (2009).
  7. IAEA, Request by the Russian Federation regarding its Initiative to Establish a Reserve of Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) for the Supply of LEU to the IAEA for its Member States, IAEA GOV/2009/81 (2009).
  8. H. S. Kwon, "Multilateral Cooperation for the Back?end Nuclear Fuel Cycle", The 8th UN-ROK Joint Conference on Disarmament and Nonproliferation Issues, Nov. 16-18, 2009, Jeju.
  9. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Cradle-to- Grave Nuclear Fuel Supply Assurance Workshop: Industry's Potential Role, PNNL-16863 (2007).
  10. C. McCombie, "Evaluating Solutions to the Nuclear Waste Problem,"Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Nov/Dec, pp.42 (2009).
  11. IAEA, The Republic of Korea's Suggestion on Possible Criteria for Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, INFCIRC/760 (2009).
  12. IAEA, Developing Multinational Radioactive Waste Repositories: Infrastructural Framework and Scenarios of Cooperation, IAEA-TECDOC-1413 (2004).
  13. IAEA, Technical, Economical and Institutional Aspects of Regional Spent Fuel Storage Facilities, IAEA-TECDOC-1482 (2005).
  14. http://www.sapierr.net
  15. H. J. Kim, C. H. Cho, and K. K. Lee, "Uncertainty Cases in Economic Evaluation of Back-End Nuclear Fuel Cycle,"J. of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society, 6 (2), pp.141-145 (2008).
  16. T. Katsuta and T. Suzuki, "A Multilateral Nuclear Fuel Cycle Approach in East Asia: Analysis of Past Proposals and Possible New Approaches including Japan,"Proc. 15th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Oct. 15-20, 2006, Sydney.
  17. Yusuke Kuno and Jor-Shan Choi, "Study on International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Framework from Nuclear Non-Proliferation Viewpoint", Proc. 50th INMM Annual Meeting, Jul. 12-16, 2009, Arizona.
  18. Jor-Shan Choi, "A Regional Compact Approach for the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy," CISAC (1997).
  19. Y. S. Whang, E. H. Kwon, E. J. Seo and J. H. Whang, "Multilateral Nuclear Cooperation in East Asia; The First Step Toward the Formation of a New Cooperation," J. of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society, Vol. 3, pp. 167-176 (2005).
  20. P. Goldschmidt, "Multilateral Nuclear Fuel Supply Guarantees and Spent Fuel Management: What Are the Priorities?" Daedalus, 139 (1), pp.7-19 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2010.139.1.7
  21. M.S. Yang, H. Choi, C.J. Jeong and K.C. Song, "The Status and Prospect of DUPIC Fuel Technology,"Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 38, p.359 (2006).
  22. http://www.actinet-i3.eu
  23. Stephane Bourg, Emmanuel Touron, Concha Caravaca, Christian Ekberg, Emmanuel Gaubert and Clement Hill, "ACSEPT: a new FP7-Euratom Collaborative Project in the field of partitioning processes for advanced fuel cycles,"ATALANTE 2008, May 19-22, 2008, Montpellier.
  24. F. McGoldrick, New US-ROK Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreement: A Precedent for a New Global Nuclear Architecture, Center for US-Korea Policy (2009).