Behavior Evaluation of Thin Bonded Continuously Reinforced Concrete Overlay on Aged Jointed Concrete Pavement(2)

노후 줄눈 콘크리트 포장 보수를 위한 얇은 연속 철근 콘크리트 덧씌우기 포장의 거동 평가(2)

  • 류성우 (중앙대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 조윤호 (중앙대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2010.08.11
  • Accepted : 2010.10.06
  • Published : 2010.12.15

Abstract

In this paper, it has been studied about the CRCO to maintain or rehabilitate the aged JCP. The CRCO and JCO was constructed at useless section of Seo-Hae-Ahn express highway in South Korea. The performance evaluation was conducted. Especially, it was focused on the roll of longitudinal reinforced steels inserted into the CRCO. On crack survey results from field construction section, the reflection cracks at joint of the existing pavement occurred in CRCO. However, due to the constraints of longitudinal reinforced steels, crack width was small. Total crack length and quantity in the CRCO more than that in the JCO. And crack spacing in the CRCO was narrower than it in the CRCP. Through the bonding strength test results, if the cold milling and cleaning as well as surface treatment is applied, there will be no debonding problem at interlayer in the early age. From analysis of the horizontal behavior at the joint, the longitudinal reinforced steels constrained crack width which became wider than initial state over time. Also, that steel in the CRCO reduced the horizontal movement due to temperature variation(4 times than that in the JCO). But, if interface is debonded, the roll decreased. Vertical VWG data showed that CRCO did not occur debonding problem at steel location, but there was some problem in JCO. It was confirmed by field coring. The tensile strain appeared in the CRCO, But the compressive strain occurred in the JCO in early age. Through the FWD test result, deflection in the CRCO was less than that in the JCO. And K value in the CRCO was greater than it in the JCO.

본 연구에서는 노후 콘크리트 포장의 효율적 유지보수를 위하여 국내 최초 적용된 연속철근 콘크리트 개념의 얇은 덧씌우기 공법(CRCO : Thin Bonded Continuously Reinforced Concrete Overlay)의 거동 특성을 살펴보았다. 서해안 고속도로의 폐도 구간에 CRCO 공법과 JCO 공법(Jointed Concrete Overlay)을 시험시공 하였으며, CRCO 공법에 삽입된 종방향 철근으로 효과를 검토하였다. 시험시공 후 균열 조사 결과, CRCO 구간의 기존 줄눈부에서부터 반사 균열이 발생하였으나 그 폭은 매우 좁았다. 철근의 구속역할로 인해 CRCO 공법에서 더 많은 균열이 발생하였으며, 그 간격은 CRCP 보다 더 좁았다. 부착강도 측정 결과, 표면 처리로 Cold Milling 후 이물질을 제거하여 초기에 층간 부착 문제가 발생하지 않았다. 기존 JCP의 줄눈부에 수평으로 매설한 계측기 데이터분석 결과, 초기 균열 터짐 시 일정 폭 이상으로 벌어지지 못하게 종방향 철근이 잡아주는 역할을 하였으며, 온도변화에 대한 수평 변위 발생 억제 효과도 있었다. 하지만 층간 부착 문제가 발생할 경우, 철근의 구속 효과는 저감되었다. 수직 계측기의 데이터를 통해서 철근이 없는 JCO 공법에 비해 CRCO 공법은 종방향 철근 위치에서 층간 부착 문제가 발생하지 않았으며, 현장 코어링 작업을 통해 이를 확인하였다. 슬래브 내의 수평 거동을 분석한 결과, 초기에 철근의 구속으로 인해 CRCO 공법에서는 인장 변형률이, 구속이 미미한 JCO 공법은 압축력이 발생하였다. FWD 데이터 분석 결과, CRCO 공법의 처짐량이 JCO 보다 더 적게 발생하였으며, 지지력 평가에서는 전반적으로 덧씌우기 후가 더 크게 나타났으며, 특히 CRCO 공법이 JCO 공법에 비해 지지력에 대한 덧씌우기 두께 효과가 더 컸다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부 홈페이지(2008), " www.mltm.go.kr"
  2. 김진춘, 권순민(2001), "특집 : 콘크리트포장의 덧씌우기 및 재포장 / 비행장 포장에서의 콘크리트 덧씌우기(Overlay)", 도로포장공학회지 제3권 제2호 20-27pp
  3. 일본토목연구소(1992), "현장타설 초조강 콘크리트의 실용화에 관한 연구"
  4. 한국도로공사 도로연구소(1997), "콘크리트 덧씌우기에 의한 포장 보강방안 연구(3)"
  5. KS F 2386", 도로포장체 부착면의 인장접착 시험방법"
  6. AASHTO (1993) AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, Washington, D.C.
  7. Bagate, M., McCullough, B. F., Fowler, D. W., and Muthu, M., "An Experimental Thin-Bonded Concrete Overlay Pavement", Research Report 357-2F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, November 1985.
  8. Cesar Ivan M.C., Seong-Cheol C., and Moon Won, "Concrete Pavement Overlays and Failure Mechanisms", Center for Transportation Research, Report No 0-4893-2, 2007.2
  9. CRT", Concrete Pavement Overlays and Failure Mechanisms", 2007.2
  10. CTR", Delamination of Boned Concrete Overlays at Early Ages", 1991.1
  11. Delatte, N. J., Grater, S. F., Trevino-Frias, M., Fowler, D. W., McCullough, B. F.", Partial Construction Report of a Bonded Concrete Overlay on IH- 10, El Paso and Guide for Expedited Bonded Concrete Overlay Design and Construction", Report 2911-5F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, December 1996.
  12. Delatte, N. J. and Laird, J. T. II, "Performance of Bonded Concrete Overlays"1998, TRB
  13. Felt, Earl J.," Resurfacing and Patching Concrete Pavements with Bonded Concrete," HRB Proceedings, Vol. 35, Washington D. C., 1956
  14. George Calvert, John Lane Jr., Chris Anderson, "Thin Bonded Concrete Overlay With Fast Track", Final Report, 1990
  15. German Claros, Moon Won", Project Summary, O-4893 : performance of old concrete under thin overlays", TxDOT
  16. IDOT", Thinbonded concrete overlay with fast tack concrete", Final report for Iowa DOT project HR-531, 1990
  17. Kailasananthan, K., McCullough, B.F., and Fowler, D.W.", A Study of the Effects of Interface Condition on Thin Bonded PCC Overlays", Research Report 357-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, December 1984.
  18. Manuel Trevino, Cesar Ivan Medina-Chavez, and Moon Won, "Preliminary Findings of Performance of Old Concrete under Thin Overlays", 2005.9.
  19. Marks, V.J., "A Fifteen Year Performance Summary of Fibrous PC Concrete Overlay Research in Greene County, Iowa", Fifteen Year Report for Iowa Highway Research Board, Research Project HR-165, Iowa Department of Transportation, August 1989.
  20. Marks, V. J., "Thin Bonded Portland Cement Concrete Overlay", Final Report for Iowa Department of Tranportation Project HR-521, Federal Highway Project DTFH71-83-3502-IA-11, November 1990.
  21. Michael M. Sprinkel, Celik Ozyildirim," Evaluation of Hydraulic Cement Concrete Overlays Placed on Three Pavements in Verginia", VTRC 01-R2, 2000.8
  22. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, "Guide To Concrete Overlay Solutions", 2007.1
  23. Norbert Delatte, Shen-en Chen, James Davidson, Anshuman Sehdev, Nader Amer, and Mark Endfinger, "Design and Quality Control of Concrete Overlays", University Transportation Center for Alabama, 2001.12
  24. Neal, B. F., "California's Thin Bonded PCC Overlay", Report No. FHWA/CA/TL-83-04, Sacramento, California, June 1983.
  25. Reiner, E. J. "Concrete Overlays Challenge Asphalt", Civil Engineering, pp 54-57. 1987.
  26. Temple, W. H., and Cumbaa, S. L., "Thin Bonded PCC Resurfacing", Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Report No. FHQA/LA-85/181, July 1985.
  27. VTRC 97-R9RB (Virginia Transportation Research Council)", Evaluation of a Thin-Bonded Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Overlay", http://pratt.vtrc.virginia.edu/briefs/97-r9rb/thin.htm
  28. Willem A., Van Metzinger, B. Frank McCullough, David W. Fowler", An Empirical- Mechanistic Design Method using Bonded Concrete Overlays For The Rehabilitation of Pavements", CTR, 1991
  29. Won, M.", Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP) in Texas: Performance & Experience 1951 - 2004", Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Conference, 2004.10
  30. Yang H Huang, Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd Edition