The Anisotropy of the London Penetration Depth and the Upper Critical Field in C-doped $MgB_2$ Single Crystals from Reversible Magnetization

  • Kang, Byeong-Won (Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Min-Seok (Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Sook (Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Ik (Department of Physics, Sogang University)
  • Received : 2010.09.02
  • Accepted : 2010.10.05
  • Published : 2010.10.31

Abstract

We have studied the anisotropy of the London penetration depth of carbon doped $MgB_2$ single crystals, which was obtained from reversible magnetization measurements with the magnetic field both parallel and perpendicular to the c-axis. Similar to the pure $MgB_2$, the anisotropy of the upper critical field ${\gamma}_H$ decrease with temperature while the anisotropy of the London penetration depth ${\gamma}_{\lambda}$ slowly increases with temperature. However, the temperature dependence of ${\gamma}_H$ is drastically reduced and the value of ${\gamma}_{\lambda}$ becomes nearly ~1 as C is introduced. These results indicate that C substitution increases impurity scattering mainly in the $\sigma$ bands. The temperature dependence of the anisotropies agree well with the theoretical predictions with impurity scattering.

Keywords

References

  1. A.Y. Liu, I.I. Mazin, J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 087005 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.087005
  2. H. J. Choi, D. Roundy, H. Sun, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Nature 418, 758 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00898
  3. S. Souma, Y. Machida, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, H. Matsui, S.-C. Wang, H. Ding, A. Kaminski, J. C. Campuzano, S. Sasaki, and K. Kadowaki, Nature 423, 65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01619
  4. L. Lyard, P. Samuely, P. Szabo, T. Klein, C. Marcenat, L. Paulius, K. H. P. Kim, C. U. Jung, H.-S. Lee, B. Kang, S. Choi, S.-I. Lee, J. Marcus, S. Blanchard, A. G. M. Jansen, U. Welp, G. Karapetrov, and W. K. Kwok, Phys. Rev. B 66, 180502(R) (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.180502
  5. T. Dahm and N. Schopohl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 017001 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.017001
  6. Gurevich, Phys. Rev. B 67, 184515 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.184515
  7. A.A. Golubov, and A.E. Koshlev, Phys. Rev. B 68, 104503 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.104503
  8. V.G. Kogan, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020509 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.020509
  9. R. Cubitt, S. Levett, S. L. Bud'ko, N. E. Anderson, and P. C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157002 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157002
  10. R. Cubitt, M. R. Eskildsen, C. D. Dewhurst, J. Jun, S. M. Kazakov, and J. Karpinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 047002 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.047002
  11. A. Golubov, A. Brinkman, O. V. Dolgov, J. Kortus, and O. Jepsen, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054524 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054524
  12. L. Lyard, P. Szabo, T. Klein, J. Marcus, C. Marcenat, K. H. Kim, B.W. Kang, H. S. Lee, and S. I. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92,057001 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057001
  13. H.J. Kim, B. Kang, M.S. Park, K.H. Kim, H.S. Lee, and S. I. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 69, 184514 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184514
  14. Kijoon H. P. Kim, Jae-Hyuk Choi, C. U. Jung, P. Chowdhury, Hyun–Sook Lee, Min-Seok Park, Heon-Jung Kim, J. Y. Kim, Zhonglian Du, Eun-Mi Choi, Mun-Seog Kim, W. N. Kang, Sung-Ik Lee, Gun Yong Sung, and Jeong Yong Lee, Phys. Rev. B 65, 100510 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.100510
  15. B. Kang, H.J. Kim, M.S. Park, K.H. Kim, and S.I. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144514 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144514
  16. M.-S. Kim, T. R. Lemberger, C. U. Jung, J.-H. Choi, J. Y. Kim, H.-J. Kim, and S.-I. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 66, 214509 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214509
  17. Z. Hao and J. R. Clem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2371 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2371
  18. V. G. Kogan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 237005 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.237005