Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

대한소아청소년과학회 (The Korean Pediatric Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multiplex PCR과 Conformation Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis를 이용한 혈우병B F9 유전자 돌연변이 직접 진단법

Direct detection of hemophilia B F9 gene mutation using multiplex PCR and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis

  • 유기영 (한국혈우재단 서울의원) ;
  • 김희진 (성균관의과대학 삼성의료원 진단검사유전학과) ;
  • 이광철 (고려대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과)
  • Yoo, Ki Young (Korea Hemophilia Foundation) ;
  • Kim, Hee Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Sumsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang Chul (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.19
  • 심사 : 2010.02.12
  • 발행 : 2010.03.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목 적 : F9 유전자는 혈우병B의 병인 유전자이다. 기존의 RFLP를 이용한 연관분석은 정보제공율이 55.6%에 불과하였다. 직접 염기서열 분석법은 98%의 돌연변이를 진단할 수 있지만, 고가의 비용이 든다. 본 연구는 F9 유전자를 대상으로 돌연변이의 선별검사로써 mPCR-CSGE를 사용하고, 이후 특정 유전자 부위만을 염기서열 분석하여 mPCR-CSGE의 유용성을 확인하기 위해 고안되었다. 방 법 : 연구대상은 비혈연 관계인 27명의 혈우병B 환자였다. 직접염기서열 분석법은 독립된 다른 기관에서 시행하였고, mPCR-CSGE 선별 후 염기서열 분석법은 본 연구자의 기관에서 시행되었다. 직접 염기서열 분석법의 결과가 참고치가 되어 mPCR-CSGE 선별 후 염기서열 분석법을 정확성, 경제성, 신속성, 편이성 측면에서 비교하였다. 두가지 방법으로 진단이 되지 않는 환자에게는 MLPA를 이용하여 돌연변이를 발견하였다. 결 과 : 직접 염기서열 분석법으로 26명(96.3%)의 환자에서 돌연변이를 확인할 수 있었다. mPCR-CSGE 선별 후 염기서열 분석법으로는 23명(85.2%)의 환자에서 돌연변이를 찾아낼 수 있었다. 1명의 환자는 MLPA로써 돌연변이를 확인할 수 있었다. 27명의 환자에게 21개의 독립적인 돌연변이가 있었다. mPCR-CSGE 선별 후 염기서열 분석법은 직접 염기서열 분석법에 비해 비용은 55.7%로 줄일 수 있었으나, 실험 단계는 더욱 복잡하였고, 시간도 하루가 더 걸렸으며, 세심한 실험상의 주의가 필요하였다. 결 론 : mPCR-CSGE 선별 후 염기서열 분석법은 85.2%의 높은 돌연변이 선별력을 보이고, 직접 염기서열 분석법의 57.7%의 비용만 소모하였으나, 실험과정에 세한 주의가 요구되었으며, 노동집약적이고, 실험 시간도 하루가 더 소요되었다.

Purpose : The F9 gene is known to be the causative gene for hemophilia B, but unfortunately the detection rate for restriction fragment length polymorphism-based linkage analysis is only 55.6%. Direct DNA sequencing can detect 98% of mutations, but this alternative procedure is very costly. Here, we conducted multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) to perform a screened DNA sequencing for the F9 gene, and we compared the results with direct sequencing in terms of accuracy, cost, simplicity, and time consumption. Methods : A total of 27 unrelated hemophilia B patients were enrolled. Direct DNA sequencing was performed for 27 patients by a separate institute, and multiplex PCR-CSGE screened sequencing was done in our laboratory. Results of the direct DNA sequencing were used as a reference, to which the results of the multiplex PCR-CSGE screened sequencing were compared. For the patients whose mutation was not detected by the 2 methods, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was conducted. Results : With direct sequencing, the mutations could be identified from 26 patients (96.3%), whereas for multiplex PCRCSGE screened sequencing, the mutations could be detected in 23 (85.2%). One patient's mutation was identified by MLPA. A total of 21 different mutations were found among the 27 patients. Conclusion : Multiplex PCR-CSGE screened DNA sequencing detected 88.9% of mutations and reduced costs by 55.7% compared with direct DNA sequencing. However, it was more labor-intensive and time-consuming.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yoshitake S, Schach BG, Foster DC, Davie EW, Kurachi K. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for human factor IX (antihemophilic factor B). Biochemistry 1985;24:3736-50 https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00335a049
  2. Roberts HR. Molecular biology of hemophilia B. Thromb Haemost 1993;70:1-9
  3. Goodeve AC, Peake IR. Diagnosis of hemophilia A and B carriers and prenatal diagnosis. In: Forbes CD, Aledort L, Madhok R, editors. Hemophilia. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997:63-74
  4. Lee JH, Choi YM, Choe J, Hwang DY, Lee JY. Usefulness of HhaI and MseI DNA polymorphism of factor IX gene in the molecular genetic diagnosis of hemophilia B in Korean population. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 1999;42:2761-7
  5. Choi YM, Kim EJ, Lee MR, Son YS, Choe J, Hwang DY, et al. Factor VIII gene mutations in Korean patients with hemophilia A. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:1975-81
  6. Yoon HS, Song KS, Kwon OH, Cho CH. Detection of factor IX gene mutation and carriers in Korean hemophilia B patients by DNA sequencing. Korean J Clin Pathol 1993;13:363-71
  7. Haemophilia B Mutation Database (version 13, 2004). Available from URL: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/ip/petergreen/haemoBdatabase.html
  8. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISSMODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 2006;22:195-201 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770
  9. Jayandharan G, Shaji RV, Chandy M, Srivastava A. Identification of factor IX gene defects using a multiplex PCR and CSGE strategy-a first report. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:2051-4 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00347.x
  10. Sommer SS, Bowie EJ, Ketterling RP, Bottema CD. Missense mutations and the magnitude of functional deficit: the example of factor IX. Hum Genet 1992;89:295-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220543
  11. Green PM. Hemophilia B-molecular basis. In: Lee CA, Berntorp E, Hoots WK, editors. Textbook of hemophilia.** the ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2005: 91-6
  12. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987;196:261-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9
  13. Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay A, Chaudhuri K, Ray K. Analysis of haemophilia B database and strategies for identification of common point mutations in the factor IX gene. Haemophilia 2003;9:187-92 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00727.x
  14. Bottema CD, Bottema MJ, Ketterling RP, Yoon HS, Janco RL, Phillips JA, et al. Why does the human factor IX gene have a G+C content of 40%? Am J Hum Genet 1991;49:839-50
  15. Ketterling RP, Bottema CD, Phillips JA, Sommer SS. Evidence that descendants of three founders constitute about 25% of hemophilia B in the united states. Genomics 1991;10:1093-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-7543(91)90207-U
  16. Ganguly A, Rock MJ, Prockop DJ. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single-base differences in double-stranded PCR products and DNA fragments: Evidence for solvent-induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:10325-9 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.21.10325
  17. Nagamine CM, Chan K, Lau YFC. A PCR artifact: generation of heteroduplexes. Am J Hum Genet 1989;45:337-9
  18. Williams IJ, Abuzenadah A, Winship PR, Preston FE, Dolan G, Wright J, et al. Precise carrier diagnosis in families with hemophilia A: use of conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation screening and polymorphism analysis. Thromb Haemost 1998;79:723-6
  19. Hill M, Deam S, Gordon B, Dolan G. Mutation analysis in 51 patients with haemophilia A: report of 10 novel mutations and correlations between genotype and clinical phenotype. Haemophilia 2005;11:133-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01069.x
  20. Hinks JL, Winship PR, Makris M, Preston FE, Peake IR, Goodeve AC. A rapid method for haemophilia B mutation detection using conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis. Br J Haematol 1999;104:915-8 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01274.x
  21. Belvini D, Salviato R, Radossi P, Pierobon F, Mori P, Castaldo G, et al. Molecular genotyping of the Italian cohort of patients with hemophilia B. Haematologica 2005;90:635-42
  22. Habart D, Kalabova D, Novotny M, Vorlova Z. Thirty-four novel mutations detected in factor VIII gene by multiplex CSGE: modeling of 13 novel amino acid substitutions. J Thromb Haemost 2002;1:773-81 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00149.x
  23. Jayandharan G, Shaji RV, Baidya S, Nair SC, Chandy M, Srivastava A. Identification of factor VIII gene mutations in 101 patients with haemophilia A: mutation analysis by inversion screening and multiplex PCR and CSGE and molecular modeling of 10 novel missense substitutions. Haemophilia 2005;11:481-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01121.x
  24. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome research 2005;15:1034-50 https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3715005
  25. Ahn SA, Ahn IS, Lee SJ, Son HS. Progress in protein structure prediction: CASP and CAFASP experiments. Korean J Public Health 2005;42:73-84
  26. Kopp J, Schwede T. Automated protein structure homology modeling: a progress report. Pharmacogenomics 2004;5:405-16 https://doi.org/10.1517/14622416.5.4.405
  27. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;14:625-34
  28. Kim WC, Park SH, Won JI. Protein structure alignment based on maximum of residue pair distance and similarity graph. Journal of KIISE:Database 2007;34:396-408