Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2010.53.3.397

Direct detection of hemophilia B F9 gene mutation using multiplex PCR and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis  

Yoo, Ki Young (Korea Hemophilia Foundation)
Kim, Hee Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Sumsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Lee, Kwang Chul (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Korea University)
Publication Information
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics / v.53, no.3, 2010 , pp. 397-407 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The F9 gene is known to be the causative gene for hemophilia B, but unfortunately the detection rate for restriction fragment length polymorphism-based linkage analysis is only 55.6%. Direct DNA sequencing can detect 98% of mutations, but this alternative procedure is very costly. Here, we conducted multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) to perform a screened DNA sequencing for the F9 gene, and we compared the results with direct sequencing in terms of accuracy, cost, simplicity, and time consumption. Methods : A total of 27 unrelated hemophilia B patients were enrolled. Direct DNA sequencing was performed for 27 patients by a separate institute, and multiplex PCR-CSGE screened sequencing was done in our laboratory. Results of the direct DNA sequencing were used as a reference, to which the results of the multiplex PCR-CSGE screened sequencing were compared. For the patients whose mutation was not detected by the 2 methods, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was conducted. Results : With direct sequencing, the mutations could be identified from 26 patients (96.3%), whereas for multiplex PCRCSGE screened sequencing, the mutations could be detected in 23 (85.2%). One patient's mutation was identified by MLPA. A total of 21 different mutations were found among the 27 patients. Conclusion : Multiplex PCR-CSGE screened DNA sequencing detected 88.9% of mutations and reduced costs by 55.7% compared with direct DNA sequencing. However, it was more labor-intensive and time-consuming.
Keywords
Hemophilia B; DNA mutational analysis; Polymerase chain reaction; Electrophoresis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi YM, Kim EJ, Lee MR, Son YS, Choe J, Hwang DY, et al. Factor VIII gene mutations in Korean patients with hemophilia A. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:1975-81
2 Yoshitake S, Schach BG, Foster DC, Davie EW, Kurachi K. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for human factor IX (antihemophilic factor B). Biochemistry 1985;24:3736-50   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Roberts HR. Molecular biology of hemophilia B. Thromb Haemost 1993;70:1-9   PUBMED
4 Jayandharan G, Shaji RV, Chandy M, Srivastava A. Identification of factor IX gene defects using a multiplex PCR and CSGE strategy-a first report. J Thromb Haemost 2003;1:2051-4   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bottema CD, Bottema MJ, Ketterling RP, Yoon HS, Janco RL, Phillips JA, et al. Why does the human factor IX gene have a G+C content of 40%? Am J Hum Genet 1991;49:839-50   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Belvini D, Salviato R, Radossi P, Pierobon F, Mori P, Castaldo G, et al. Molecular genotyping of the Italian cohort of patients with hemophilia B. Haematologica 2005;90:635-42   PUBMED   ScienceOn
7 Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome research 2005;15:1034-50   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ahn SA, Ahn IS, Lee SJ, Son HS. Progress in protein structure prediction: CASP and CAFASP experiments. Korean J Public Health 2005;42:73-84
9 Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;14:625-34
10 Williams IJ, Abuzenadah A, Winship PR, Preston FE, Dolan G, Wright J, et al. Precise carrier diagnosis in families with hemophilia A: use of conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation screening and polymorphism analysis. Thromb Haemost 1998;79:723-6   PUBMED
11 Kim WC, Park SH, Won JI. Protein structure alignment based on maximum of residue pair distance and similarity graph. Journal of KIISE:Database 2007;34:396-408   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
12 Hill M, Deam S, Gordon B, Dolan G. Mutation analysis in 51 patients with haemophilia A: report of 10 novel mutations and correlations between genotype and clinical phenotype. Haemophilia 2005;11:133-41   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Habart D, Kalabova D, Novotny M, Vorlova Z. Thirty-four novel mutations detected in factor VIII gene by multiplex CSGE: modeling of 13 novel amino acid substitutions. J Thromb Haemost 2002;1:773-81   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Nagamine CM, Chan K, Lau YFC. A PCR artifact: generation of heteroduplexes. Am J Hum Genet 1989;45:337-9   PUBMED   ScienceOn
15 Haemophilia B Mutation Database (version 13, 2004). Available from URL: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/ip/petergreen/haemoBdatabase.html
16 Sommer SS, Bowie EJ, Ketterling RP, Bottema CD. Missense mutations and the magnitude of functional deficit: the example of factor IX. Hum Genet 1992;89:295-7   DOI   PUBMED
17 Kopp J, Schwede T. Automated protein structure homology modeling: a progress report. Pharmacogenomics 2004;5:405-16   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ketterling RP, Bottema CD, Phillips JA, Sommer SS. Evidence that descendants of three founders constitute about 25% of hemophilia B in the united states. Genomics 1991;10:1093-6   DOI   PUBMED
19 Hinks JL, Winship PR, Makris M, Preston FE, Peake IR, Goodeve AC. A rapid method for haemophilia B mutation detection using conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis. Br J Haematol 1999;104:915-8   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ganguly A, Rock MJ, Prockop DJ. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single-base differences in double-stranded PCR products and DNA fragments: Evidence for solvent-induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:10325-9   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Mukherjee S, Mukhopadhyay A, Chaudhuri K, Ray K. Analysis of haemophilia B database and strategies for identification of common point mutations in the factor IX gene. Haemophilia 2003;9:187-92   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISSMODEL Workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 2006;22:195-201   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Green PM. Hemophilia B-molecular basis. In: Lee CA, Berntorp E, Hoots WK, editors. Textbook of hemophilia.** the ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2005: 91-6
24 Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987;196:261-82   DOI   PUBMED
25 Yoon HS, Song KS, Kwon OH, Cho CH. Detection of factor IX gene mutation and carriers in Korean hemophilia B patients by DNA sequencing. Korean J Clin Pathol 1993;13:363-71
26 Jayandharan G, Shaji RV, Baidya S, Nair SC, Chandy M, Srivastava A. Identification of factor VIII gene mutations in 101 patients with haemophilia A: mutation analysis by inversion screening and multiplex PCR and CSGE and molecular modeling of 10 novel missense substitutions. Haemophilia 2005;11:481-91   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Lee JH, Choi YM, Choe J, Hwang DY, Lee JY. Usefulness of HhaI and MseI DNA polymorphism of factor IX gene in the molecular genetic diagnosis of hemophilia B in Korean population. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 1999;42:2761-7
28 Goodeve AC, Peake IR. Diagnosis of hemophilia A and B carriers and prenatal diagnosis. In: Forbes CD, Aledort L, Madhok R, editors. Hemophilia. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997:63-74