Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of Self-leadership on empowerment, self-efficacy and innovation

셀프리더십이 조직구성원의 임파워먼트, 자기효능감 및 혁신성에 미치는 영향

  • Rhee, Jung-Yoon (Department of Business Administration, Chung-Ang Univ.) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Ju (Department of Business Administration, Chung-Ang Univ.) ;
  • Hahn, Ju-Hee (Department of Business Administration, Chung-Ang Univ.)
  • 이정윤 (중앙대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 강은주 (중앙대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 한주희 (중앙대학교 상경학부)
  • Received : 2010.09.16
  • Accepted : 2010.11.19
  • Published : 2010.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between self-leadership(rehearsal, self-goal setting, self-respect) and empowerment, self-efficacy and innovation. In order to verify the relationships, data obtained from 305 employees working in Seoul were analyzed by using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 8.0. This study reports findings as follows: First, the relationship between the self-leadership(rehearsal, self-respect) and the empowerment is positively related. Second, there was also a positive correlation between the self -leadership(rehearsal, self-goal setting, self-respect) and the self-efficacy. Third, the empowerment is positively related with innovation, however self-efficacy has no correlation with innovation. Implications of these results for research and practice were discussed.

본 연구는 셀프리더십의 하위요소인 리허설, 자기설정목표, 자기존중이 임파워먼트 및 자기효능감에 미치는 영향을 알아보고, 임파워먼트와 자기효능감이 혁신성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지 조사하였다. 본 연구의 목적을 위하여 국내 외국계 기업 4개를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 수집한 설문지 중 305부의 응답내용을 분석대상으로 하였으며, SPSS 18.0과 AMOS 8.0을 사용하여 구조방정식 모형을 검증하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 셀프리더십의 하위요소인 리허설과 자기존중은 임파워먼트를 높이지만, 자기설정목표가 임파워먼트에 미치는 영향력은 검증되지 않았다. 또한 셀프리더십의 세 가지 하위요소는 모두 자기효능감에 정(+)의 영향력을 미치며, 임파워먼트는 혁신성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 자기효능감이 혁신성에 미치는 영향력은 검증되지 않음을 알 수 있었다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 시사점과 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향이 논의되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Super leadership. New York. Berkerly Books. 27-43 .1990.
  2. McCarthy, A. M., & Schoenecker, T. S Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics, R&D Management, 29, 199-216. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00130
  3. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. Innovation, market orientation, and organiational learning: An integration and empirical examination, Journal of Marketing, 62, 42-54, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742
  4. Porter, M. E. Competitive advantage, New York, The Free Press. 1985.
  5. Schumpeter, J. The thoery of economic development, Cambriedge, England, Cambridge University Press, 1934.
  6. Drucker, P. F. The Coming of the New Organization, Harvard Business Review, 66, 45-53, 1988.
  7. Amabile, T. M. A model of creativity and innovation in organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-147, 1988.
  8. Manz, C. C. Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations, Academy of Management Review, Vol.11. 585-600. 1986.
  9. Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S. & Manz, C. C. Self-Leadership and performance outcomes: The mediating influence of self-efficacy, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 523-538. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199809)19:5<523::AID-JOB860>3.0.CO;2-I
  10. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work team, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 106-128, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
  11. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. Relationship of core self-evaluation traits, self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability with job satisfaction and job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
  12. John, D. P. Self-Leadership behavioral-focused strategies and team performance: The mediating influence of job satisfaction, Journal of Leadership and Organization Development, 27, 204-216. 2006.
  13. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R.N. The empowerment process integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 470-484, 1988.
  14. Spreitzer, G. M. An Empirical test of comprehensive model of interpersonal empowerment in the workplace, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 601-629. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506984
  15. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. Two dacades of self-leadership thoery and research, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21. 270-295. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097
  16. Lee, M. & J. Koh. "Is empowerment really a new concept?". International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 684-695. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/713769649
  17. Shipper, F., & Manz. C. C. Employee Self-management without Formally Designed Team: An Alternative Road to Empowerment, Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), 48-61. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(92)90024-H
  18. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying thoery of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 195-215. 1977.
  19. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. 1986.
  20. Gist, M. E. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management, Academy of Management Review ,12, 472-485. 1987.
  21. Mans, C. C., & Neck, C. P. Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering your self for Personal Excellence, 3rd ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2004.
  22. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. Thought self- Leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee cognition, behavior, and affect, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(5), 445-467. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199609)17:5<445::AID-JOB770>3.0.CO;2-N
  23. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. Thought self-Leadership: The influence of self-talk and mental imagery on performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(7), 681-699. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130705
  24. 이은숙, 신제구, 백기복, "슈퍼리더십과 셀프리더십 이 자기권능감과 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구," 인사조직학회 춘계학술발표논문, 275-276, 2000.
  25. 박동수, 이희영. "자기유능감과 직무성과간의 관계에 대한 셀프리더십의 매개작용", 인사조직연구, 10(1), 135-159. 2002.
  26. 정태희, " 셀프리더십 교육이 대학생의 셀프리더십과 자존감 증진에 미치는 효과", 한국교육개발원, 32(1), 223-248, 2005.
  27. 이건표 "개인특성, 관계특성, 혁신행동 및 혁신성과 간의 관계-다차원적 혁신행동을 중심으로-", 경영학 박사학위논문, 동양대학교 대학원, 2008.
  28. West, A. & Farr, J. L. Innovation at work, Innovation and creativity at work, Psychological and Organizational Strategies, New York, Wiley. 1989.
  29. Farr, J. L., & Ford. C. M. Individual innovation, Innovation and creativity at work, New York, Wiley. 1990.
  30. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Leading workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-managing Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1). 106-128. 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
  31. 김원배, "기업 근로자의 셀프리더십과 직무만족에 관한 연구", 연세대학교 산업대학원, 2001.
  32. 조경희, " 셀프리더십이 간호사의 직무만족 및 간호 업무성과에 미치는 영향", 고려대학교 교육대학원, 2004.
  33. 이춘식, " 조직구성원의 지각된 변혁적 리더십과 셀프리더십이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 2006.
  34. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. Two dacades of self-leadership thoery and research, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21. 270-295. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097
  35. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Testing a Hierachical Factor Structure for Self-Leadership, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210450484
  36. Spreitzer, G. M. An Empirical test of comprehensive model of interpersonal empowerment in the workplace, American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 601-629. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506984
  37. 김아영, 차정은, "자기효능감 측정", 동계학술발표대회논문집, 교육심리학회개발, 51-64, 1996.
  38. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. Determinants of Innovation Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  39. Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior, Journal of Intellectural Capital, 2(3), 284-296. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
  40. Joreskog, K. G. Lisrel: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Publication. 1989.
  41. DeVellis, R. F. Scale development: theory and application. Applied Social Research Method Series 26. California: Sage Publication Inc. 1991.
  42. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. J. "On the evaluation of structural equation models." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  43. Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U. "Goal setting and goal-striving in consumer behavior," Journal of Marketing, 63, 19-32. 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252098
  44. Diliello, T, C., & Houghton, J. D. Maximizing Organizational Leadership Capacity for the Future: Toward a Model of Self-Leadership, Innovation and Creativity, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319-337. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663114