Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case study of Life Cycle Cost Analysis on Apartment houses and Han-Ok

아파트와 한옥의 LCC(Life Cycle Cost)분석 사례 연구

  • Kim, Keun-Woo (Graduate School of Architectural Engineering, GyeongSang National University) ;
  • Yun, Seok-Heon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Engineering Research Institute, GyeongSang National University)
  • Received : 2010.03.05
  • Accepted : 2010.11.25
  • Published : 2010.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To analyze the total cost of ownership in a building construction project, we have to consider initial plan, maintenance and operation cost, in addition to the design and construction cost. This is called "Life Cycle Cost (LCC)." Currently, it is difficult to analyze LCC because of a lack of data and the appropriate criteria. This study tries to suggest a way to analyze the LCC of building construction projects, and apply it to case studies of modern apartment houses and Han-Ok, a type of traditional Korean house. The case studies found that a Han-Ok is more efficient than a modern apartment house from an LCC point of view, in terms of maintenance and operation cost.

건축물의 총 소유비용을 분석하기 위해서는 초기단계의 설계와 시공비용 이외에도 기획비용, 유지관리 및 운영비용을 고려해야 한다. 이를 LCC(Life Cycle Cost)라고 부른다. 현재, 충분한 데이터와 기준의 부족으로 인해 LCC의 분석에 많은 어려움을 겪고 있다. 본 연구에서는 건축물의 LCC 분석 방법을 제시하고, 현대식 아파트와 전통 한옥 주택에 대한 LCC 사례 분석을 수행하고자 한다. 사례 연구의 결과 한옥이 현대식 아파트에 비해 유지보수와 운영 비용에 있어서 보다 효율적인 것으로 조사되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim TH, Gu BH, Kim OG, Park TK, Lee HS. The Development of Life Cycle Cost Evaluation Index for Public Facilities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2008;9(6):216-223.
  2. Ministry of Transportation and Marine. LCC Analysis and Assessment Practice. Ministry of Transportation and Marine; 2008.
  3. Park TK. A Study on the Running Cost of Apartment Houses in Seoul. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea 1999;1(1):139-147.
  4. Gu BH, Kim TH, Kim OG. A Study on the Running Cost of Apartment Houses in Seoul, Proceeding of Architectural Institute of Korea Conference 2007:738-741.
  5. Choi YJ, Lee CK, Lee MH, Jung YH, Park TK. A Study on the Designing of LC on Apartments for curtailment of Life Cycle Cost(I). Proceeding of Architectural Institute of Korea Conference 2008:551-554.
  6. Kim OG, Kim TH. A Study on the Life Cycle Cost Evaluation Model. Architecture 2008;52(2):36-38.
  7. Jeong HW, CHoi BJ, Kim OG, A Study of the Hindrance Factor of Practical Use on Life Cycle Cost(LCC) Analysis. Proceeding of Construction Engineering and Management Conference 2007:267-270.

Cited by

  1. The atmospheric environmental impact of a Korean traditional building’s life cycle, along with carbon footprint analysis vol.28, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.008
  2. emission simulation models of apartment building projects using system dynamics pp.1423-0070, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18754342