DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EFFECT OF AN INTERMEDIATE BONDING RESIN AND FLOWABLE RESIN ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF TWO-STEP TOTAL ETCHING ADHESIVES WITH A SELF-CURING COMPOSITE RESIN

자가 중합 복합 레진과 두 단계 산 부식 접착제의 친화성에 대한 중간 접착제와 흐름성 레진의 효과

  • Choi, Sook-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yum, Ji-Wan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 최속경 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 염지완 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

This study compared the effect of an activator, intermediate bonding resin and low-viscosity flowable resin on the microtensile bond strength of a self-curing composite resin used with two-step total etching adhesives. Twenty extracted permanent molars were used. The teeth were assigned randomly to nine groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system and application of additional methods (activator, intermediate adhesive, flowable resin). The bonding agents and additional applications of each group were applied to the dentin surfaces. Self-curing composite resin buildups were made for each tooth to form a core, 5mm in height. The restored teeth were then stored in distilled water at room temperature for 24h before sectioning. The microtensile bond strength of all specimens was examined. The data was analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and a Scheffe's test. The application of an intermediate bonding resin (Optibond FL adhesive) and low-viscosity flowable resin (Tetric N-flow) produced higher bond strength than that with the activator in all groups. Regardless of the method selected, Optibond solo plus produced the lowest ${\mu}TBS$ to dentin. The failure modes of the tested dentin bonding agents were mostly adhesive failure but there were some cases showed cohesive failure in the resin.

이 연구의 목적은 자가 중합복합 레진과 두 단계 산 부식 접착제의 친화성에 대한 중간 접착제와흐름성 레진의 효과를 미세 인장 결합 강도를 통해 비교하는 것이었다. 20개의 발거된 대구치를 사용해 접착제와 부가적인 적용(활성제, 중간 접착제, 흐름성 레진)에 따라 XP bond 그룹 (XA, XB, XF 그룹), Prime & Bond NT 그룹 (NA, NB, NF 그룹), Optibond solo plus 그룹 (OA, OB OX 그룹)으로 나누었다. 접착제 적용 후 활성제, 중간 접착제, 흐름성 레진을 각각 적용하고 상부에 자가 중합 레진을 축성하였다. 24시간 동안 실온의 증류수에 보관 후 각 그룹당 10개의 시편을 준비하였다. 모든 시편의 미세인장 결합 강도를 측정하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 모든 그룹에서 중간 접착제와 흐름성 레진의 적용은 활성제 적용보다 더 높은 결합 강도를 보였다. 2. 선택된 방법에 관계없이, Optibond solo plus 그룹은 가장 낮은 미세인장 결합강도를 보였다. 3. 파절 양상은 대부분 접착성 파절을 보였고 일부 레진 내에서 응집성 파절을 보였다. 이번 연구의 결과로부터, 중간 접착제와 흐름성 레진의 적용이 낮은 pH를 가지는 두 단계 산 부식 접착제와 자가 중합복합 레진의 상아질 접착에 더 효과적이라 예상된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Franco EB, Lopes LG, D'Alpino PH, Pereira JC. Influence of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin. Braz Dent J 16(2):107-111, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402005000200004
  2. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 12(4):236-44, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
  3. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashely DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17(6):542-556, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00016-1
  4. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Combe EC, Simpson CH 3rd,Nunes MF. Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent 14(3):137-140, 2001
  5. Jung MK, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Han YC, Choung SJ. Effect of additional coating of bonding resin on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31(2):103-111, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.2.103
  6. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5(1):27-40, 2003
  7. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light-cured resin composites on bonding of all-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 3(3):207-225, 2001
  8. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5(2):91-105, 2003
  9. Giannini M, De Goes MF, Nikaido T, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Influence of activation mode of dual-cured resin composite cores and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin treated with self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 6(4):301-306, 2004
  10. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 26(1):70-75, 2001
  11. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 15(2):105- 113, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
  12. Montes MA, de Goes MF, da Cunha MR, Soares AB. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent 29(6): 435-441, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00037-9
  13. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26(1):60-69, 2001
  14. Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. J Dent 31(1):59-66, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00122-7
  15. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a 'resin coating'on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 28(1):28-35, 2003
  16. Behle C. Flowable composites: properties and applications. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 10(3):347,350- 351, 1998
  17. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 26(3):302-307, 2001
  18. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 18(8):609-621, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00005-2
  19. Swift EJ Jr. Dentin bonding, caries control. J Esthet Dent 12(5):236-237, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00229.x
  20. Castellon P, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four core materials to dentin bonded with light-cured or dual-cured adhesive. Am J Dent 17(6):401-403, 2004
  21. Nyunt MM, Imai Y. Adhesion to dentin with resin using sulfinic acid initiator system. Dent Mater J 15(2):175-182, 1996 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.15.175
  22. Imai Y, Kadoma Y, Kojima K, Akimoto T, Ikakura K, Ohta T. Importance of polymerization initiator systems and interfacial initiation of polymerization in adhesive bonding of resin to dentin. J Dent Res 70(7):1088- 1091, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700071401
  23. Nikaido T, Podszun W, Mu¨ller M, Nakabayashi N. Effect of sulfonamides and 4-MET on adhesion to tooth substrates. Dent Mater 6(2):78-82, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80034-X
  24. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 64(12):1409-1411, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640121801
  25. Kanca J 3rd. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5(4):213-215, 1992
  26. Abate PF, Rodriguez VI, Macchi RL. Evaporation of solvent in one-bottle adhesives. J Dent 28(6):437-440, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00018-X
  27. Ko KH, Cho YG, Jin CH, Yoo SH. Effect of wetness on the enamel bonding. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29(3):205- 211, 2004 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.3.205
  28. Jacobsen T, So ¨derholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 11(2):132-136, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80048-4
  29. Giannini M, Arrais CA, Vermelho PM, Reis RS, dos Santos LP, Leite ER. Effects of the solvent evaporation technique on the degree of conversion of one-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 33(2):149-154, 2008 https://doi.org/10.2341/07-54
  30. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation, and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 11(5):225-228, 1998
  31. Cho YG, Yoo SH. Comparative enamel bond strength between light-and dual-cured composites bonded by self-etching adhesives. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 32(1):1- 7, 2007 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.1.001
  32. Powers CM, Lee IY, Skinner HB, Keyak JH. Effects of distal cement voids on cement stress in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13(7):793-798, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90033-X