Effect of Ethanol on Aerobic Biodegradation of Benzene, Toluene, and Ethylbenzene by Rhodococcus sp. EH831

Rhodococcus sp. EH831에 의한 벤젠, 톨루엔 및 에틸벤젠의 호기성 생분해에 미치는 에탄올의 영향

  • Lee, Seung-Ha (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Hee (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Suk (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이승하 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 이은희 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 조경숙 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과)
  • Published : 2009.09.28

Abstract

The usage of ethanol (EtOH)-blended gasoline (gasohol), has been increasing in recent years. EtOH has influence on the distribution and biodegradation of aromatic compounds such as BTEX (benzene (B), toluene (T), ethylbenzene (B), and xylene (X)) that are gasoline compositions. In this study, the effect of EtOH on the aerobic biodegradation of B, T and E was investigated using a BTEX and EtOH-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. EH831. The degradation rates of B in the conditions of 1:1, 1:4, and 1:0.25 mixtures with EtOH (B:EtOH, mol:mol) were ranged from $3.82{\pm}0.20$ to $5.00{\pm}0.37{\mu}mol{\cdot}g-dry$ cell wight $(DCW)^{-1}{\cdot}h^{-1}$. The degradation rate of T was the fastest in the 1:0.25 mixture ($6.63{\pm}0.06{\mu}mol{\cdot}g-DCW^{-1}{\cdot}h^{-1}$), and it was the lowest in the 1:4 mixture ($4.41{\pm}0.04{\mu}mol{\cdot}DCW^{-1}{\cdot}h^{-1}$). The degradation rates of E were increased with increasing the addition amount of EtOH: The degradation rate of E was the highest in the 1:4 mixture ($1.60{\pm}0.03{\mu}mol{\cdot}g-DCW^{-1}{\cdot}h^{-1}$), and the rates were $1.42{\pm}0.06$, $1.30{\pm}0.01$, and $1.01{\pm}0.30{\mu}mol{\cdot}g-DCW^{-1}{\cdot}h^{-1}$ in the 1:1, 1:0.25, 1.0 mixtures, respectively. In conclusion, the biodegradation of B, T, E by Rhodococcus sp. EH831 was not significantly inhibited by the co-existence of EtOH.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen, Y. D., J. F. Barker, and L. Gui. 2008. A strategy for aromatic hydrocarbon bioremediation under anaerobic conditions and the impacts of ethanol: A microcosm study. J. Contam. Hydrol. 96: 17-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.09.006
  2. Corseuil, H. X. and P. J. J. Alvarez. 1996 Natural bioremediation perspective for BTX contaminated ground water in Brazil: effect of ethanol. Water Sci. Technol. 34: 311-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(96)00759-7
  3. Corseuil, H. X., C.S. Hunt, R. dos Santos Ferreira, and P. J. J. Alvarez. 1998. The influence of the gasoline oxygenate ethnol on aerobic and anaerobic BTX biodegradation. Water Res. 32: 2065-2072 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00438-7
  4. Da Silva, M. L. B. and P. J. J. Alvarez. 2002. Effects of ethanol versus MTBE on benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene natural attenuation in aquifer columns. J. Environ. Eng. 128: 862-867 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:9(862)
  5. Da Silva, M. L. B., G. M. L. Ruiz-Auilar, and P. J. J. Alvarez. 2005. Enhanced anaaerobic biodegradation of BTEX-ethanol mixtures in aquifer columns amended with sulfate, chelated ferric of nitrate. Biodegradation 16: 105-114 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-004-4897-5
  6. Hunt, C., P. J. J. Alvarez, R. dos Santos Fereira, and H. Z. Corseuil. 1997. pp. 49-54. Proc. 4th Int. In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio
  7. Lee, E. H. and K. S. Cho. 2009. Effect of substrate interaction on the degradation of methyl tert-butyl ether, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene by Rhodococcus sp. J. Hazard. Mater. 167: 669-674 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.035
  8. Lee, K. Y. 2008. Viscosity of high-alcohol content fuel blends with water: Subsurface contaminant transport implications. J. Hazard. Mater. 160: 94-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.088
  9. Lovanh, N., C. S. Hunt, and P. J. J. Alvarez. 2002. Effect of ethanol on BTEX biodegradation kinetics: aerobic continuous culture experiments. Water Res. 36: 3739-3746 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00090-8
  10. Niven, R. K. 2005. Ethanol in gasoline: enviromnental impacts and sustainability review article. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 9: 535-555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.06.003
  11. Scharlemann, J. P. W. and W. F. Laurance. 2008. How green are biofuels? Science 319: 43-44 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153103
  12. Schneider, M. R., H. X. Corseuil, and M. Rosrio. 2005. Weathering of ethanol-blended gasoline in aquifers-a field experiment. pp. 100-106. In The International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, vol 1, National Academy of Science, New Orleans
  13. Strauss, J. M., K. J. Riedel, and C. A. Du Plessis. 2004. Mesophilic and thermophilic BTEX substrate interactions for a toluene-acclimated biofilter. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64: 855-861 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1483-4
  14. Williams, P. R. D., C. A. Cushing, and P. J. Sheehan. 2003. Data available for evaluating the risks and benefits of MTBE and ethanol as alternative fuel oxygenates. Risk Anal. 23: 1085-1115 https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00384
  15. Yu, S., J. G. Freitas, A. J. A. Unger, J. F. Barker, and J. Chatzis. 2009. Simulating the evolution of an ethanol and gasoline source zone within the capillary fringe. J. Contam. Hydrol. 105: 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.11.006