한국항만경제학회지 (Journal of Korea Port Economic Association)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.95-114
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-3855(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-1330(eISSN)
한국항만경제학회 (The Korea Port Economic Association)
권호 표지

환경변화를 고려한 우리나라 물류시스템 분석요소 평가

An Evaluation of Constitutional Factors of Logistics System under the Consideration of Environmental Changes

  • 여기태 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)법을 이용하여 우리나라 물류시스템를 구성하는 분석요소인 '내부 구성요소'와 '외부 요구항목'을 추출하고, 이들 요소의 가중치 및 우선순위 제시하여 우리나라 물류시스템 효율화에 시급한 개선점 제시를 연구의 목적으로 하였다. 연구의 결과, '내부 구성요소'는 도로, 철도, 해운, 항공, 파이프라인의 총 5가지 요소로 구성됨을 확인하였다. AHP법을 이용한 분석결과, 설문에 응답한 전문가들은 도로(0.312)를 가장 중요한 내부 구성요소로 판단하고 있으며, 해운(0.269)을 2순위, 철도(0.239)을 3순위, 항공(0.118)을 4순위, 파이프라인(0.063)을 5순위로 중요하게 고려하고 있었다. 한편, 물류시스템 '외부 요구항목'은 기반시설, 운영효율성, 정보시스템, 인적자원, 비즈니스환경, 정치적환경, 연계성 등 총 7가지 요소로 구성됨을 확인하였다. '외부 요구항목에 대하여 AHP법을 적용한 결과 설문에 응답한 전문가들은 요구항목 중 기반시설(0.322)을 1순위, 운영효율성(0.206)을 2순위, 정보시스템(0.151)을 3순위, 인적자원(0.121)을 4순위, 비즈니스환경(0.075)을 5순위, 연계성(0.073)을 6순위, 정치적환경(0.052)을 가장 낮은 순위로 판단함을 알 수 있었다.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate weight and priority values for 'inner consisted factors' and 'outer requested factors' of logistics system using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchicy Process) method. As for analysis regarding inner consisted factors, the results were shown as follows: a road transportation (0.312) as first rank; a marine transportation (0.269) as second rank; a railway transportation (0.239) as third rank; an air transportation (0.118) as fourth rank, and a pipeline transportation (0.063) as fifth rank. In terms of analysis regarding outer requested factors, the results were came out as follows: an infrastructure (0.322) as first rank; a performance (0.206) as second rank; an information system (0.151) as third rank; a human resources (0.121) as fourth rank, a business environment (0.075) as fifth rank; a connectivity (0.073) as sixth rank, and a political environment (0.052) as seventh rank.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 여기태, "한반도를 물류거점화하기 위한 성공요인 도출 및 구조모델 구축에 관한 연구", [한국물류학회], 제14집, 제2호, 2004, pp. 27-47.
  2. 정태원.곽규석, "동종항만군 분류를 통한 컨테이너항만의 운영효율화 방안에 관한 연구 ", [대한교통학회지], 제19권, 제1호, 2001, pp. 7-16.
  3. 하동우.김수엽, "컨테이너항만의 물류경쟁력 국제비교", 한국해양수산개발원, 1998.
  4. Bookbinder, J. and Tan, C., "Comparison of Asian and European logistics systems", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol.33 No. 1, 2003, pp. 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030310460990
  5. Button, K. and Lall, S., The economics of being an airport hub city, Research in Transportation Economics, Vol.5, 1999, pp. 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(99)80005-5
  6. Campbell J., A survey of network hub location, Studies in Locational Analysis, Vol.6, 1994, pp. 31-49.
  7. Chang, Young-tae, Lee, Sang-yoon and Lie, Sek-guan , Factors Affecting Liners' Port Selection by Trade Route, Korea Maritime Institute, 2002.
  8. Chiu, R.H., Logistics performance of liner shipping in Taiwan, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Maritime Studies and International Transport University of Wales College of Cardiff, 1996.
  9. Council of Logistics Management, World Class Logistics: The challenge of managing continuous change, 1995.
  10. Fleming, D. and Hayuth, Y. "Concepts of strategic commercial location: the case of container ports", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.21, No.3, 1994, pp. 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839400000042
  11. Horner, M. and O'Kelly, M, "Embedding economies of scale concepts for hub network design", Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.9, 2001, pp. 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00019-9
  12. Jeon, I. S., Kim, H. S. and Kim, B. J. (1993), Strategy for improvement of competitive power in korea container port, Korea Maritime Institute, Seoul.
  13. Kim, G.S. Tranforming Korea into a Logistics Center for Northeast Asia, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Anyang, 1998, pp. 1-9.
  14. Lee, H.S. and Yang H.M., "Strategies for a global logistics and economic hub: Incheon international airport", Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol 9., 2003, pp.113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(02)00065-0
  15. Leer, Y.I. and Hobday, M., "Korea's new globalization strategy: Can Korea become a business hub in Northeast Asia?", Management Decision, Vol.45, No.5, 2003, pp. 498-510.
  16. Lu, C.S., "Logistics services in Taiwanese maritime firms", Transportation Research Part E, Vol.36, No.2, 2000.
  17. Oum, T.H. and Park, J.H., "Multinational firms location preference for regional distribution centers: focus on the Northeast Asian region", Transportation Research Part E, Vol.40, 2004, pp. 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(03)00036-X
  18. Saaty. T. L.(1997), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mcgraw-Hill Book Co., 1997.
  19. Sit, V., New competitiveness for Hong Kong and South China based on air logistics, Geography Annual, Vol. 86, 2004, pp. 145-163.
  20. Starr, J.T., "The mid-Atlantic Load Center: Baltimore or Hampton Road?", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.21, No.3, 1994.
  21. Tsai, M. and Su, Y., "Political risk assessment on air logistics hub developments in Taiwan", Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol.8. 2002, pp. 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(02)00016-9
  22. Wood, D.F., Barone, A., Murphy, P. and Wardlow, D.L., International Logistics, Ch.3.: Logistics and transportation in different parts of the world, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.
  23. Yeo, G-T., and Song, D. W., "An Evaluation of Container Ports in China and Korea with the Analytic Hierarchy Process ", Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2003, pp. 726-741.
  24. Yeo, G.- T., Roe, M. and Dinwoodie, J., "Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China", Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.014