한국토양비료학회지 (Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer)

  • 제42권3호
  • /
  • Pages.192-200
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 0367-6315(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2162(eISSN)
한국토양비료학회 (Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer)
권호 표지

토양의 유효태 인산과 치환성 양이온의 다성분동시추출 분석방법 비교

Comparison of Multi-element Extraction Methods to Determine Available Phosphate and Exchangeable Cations of Korean Soils

  • 투고 : 2009.02.05
  • 심사 : 2009.05.18
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

과학영농과 친환경농업이 대두되면서 토양검정량이 급속하게 증가하고 이에 대처하기 위해 신속하게 분석할 수 있는 분석 방법이 요구되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 신속 간편하게 분석할 수 있는 다성분동시 추출방법으로 개발된 Mehlich III법, Mod. Morgan법, Kelowna 법과 국내에서 사용 중인 유효태 인산 분석법인 Lancaster법, 치환성 양이온 분석법인 1M $NH_4OAc법으로 분석되는 분석치들 간의 상관관계를 검토하기 위하여 토양특성이 다양한 우리나라 농경지 115개소에서 토양을 채취하여 여러 가지 방법으로 화학적 분석을 실시하였다. 다성분동시추출 분석방법인 Mehlich III법, Mod. Morgan법, Kelowna법과 기존의 유효인산 분석방법인 Lancaster법과 치환성 양이온 분석방법인 1M $NH_4OAc법으로 추출한 분석치는 모두 고도로 유의한 직선적인 상관관계에 있었다. 유효인산은 Mehlich III법, Mod. Morgan법, Kelowna 법과 Lancaster법으로 추출되는 분석치간에 결정계수($R^2) 의 크기는 Mehlich III법($0.979^{***}$) > Kelowna법 ($0.977^{***}$) > Mod. Morgan법($0.553^{***}$)의 순으로 Mehlich III 법 이상관이 가장 높게 나타났고 Lancaster 법보다 토양 중의 인산을 평균적으로 28% 많이 추출하였다. 치환성 양이온에서도 화산회 토양에서 추출되는 나트륨 성분을 제외하고는 Mehlich III 법으로 추출되는 분석치가 1M $NH_4OAc법으로 추출되는 것과 가장 상관이 높았다. 따라서 ICP를 이용하여 유효인산과 치환성 양이온의 분석은 다성분동시추출방법인 Mehlich III법이 이용 가능할 것으로 판단되었다.

Soil testing is one of the best management practices for sustainable agriculture. Recently, as increasing soil testing needs, simplification of soil analytical procedure has been required. To determine recommendable multi-element extractant, the soil testing results of available phosphate and exchangeable cations between the conventional methods (Lancaster and 1M $NH_4OAc) and multi-element extraction methods such as Mehlich III, Modified Morgan and Kelowna methods were compared. There were highly significant correlation between the conventional methods and multi-element extraction methods (Mehlich III, Modified Morgan and Kelowna) for available phosphate and exchangeable K, Ca, Mg and Na. The coefficients of determination ($R^2) between available phosphate extracted by Lancaster method and multielement extraction methods were in the order of Mehlich III ($0.979^{***}$) > Kelowna ($0.977^{***}$) > Modified(Mod.). Morgan ($0.553^{***}$). For exchangeable cations, there were highly significant correlations between 1M $NH_4OAc method and Mehlich III, Mod. Morgan and Kelowna. However, exchangeable K, Ca and Mg by Mehlich III method were more highly correlated with conventional method than other methods. Therefore, Mehlich III extraction method could be recommended as a single extractant for simultaneous measurement using ICP in the analysis of avaliable phosphate and exchangeable cations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bray, R. H., and L. T. Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Science 59:39-45 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  2. Elrashidi, M. A., M. D. Mays, and C. W. Lee. 2003. Assessment of Mehlich 3 and Ammonium Bicarbonate-DTPA Extraction for Simultaneous Measurement of Fifteen Elements in Soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 34(19&20):2817-2838 https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120025208
  3. Emgblom, S. O. 1999. Determination of inorganic phosphate in a soil extract using a cobalt electrode . Plant Soil 206:173-179 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004451308787
  4. Gartley. K. L., J. T. Sims, C. T. Olsen, and P. Chu. 2002. Comparison of soil test extractants used in Mid-Atlantic Uinted States. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33(5&6):873-895 https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120003072
  5. Jung, W. K. and Y. H. Kim. 2006. Soil organic carbon determination for calcareous soils. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 39(6):396-401
  6. Ketterings, O. M., K. J. Cymmek, W.S. Reid, and R.F. Wildman. 2002. Conversion of Modified Morgan and Mehlich-Ⅲ soil tests to Morgan soil test values. Soil Science. 167(12):830-837 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200212000-00007
  7. Ketterings, Q. M. and M. Flock. 2005. Comparison of Bray-1 and Mehich-3 tests in high phosphorus soils. Soil Science 170(3):212-219 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200503000-00007
  8. Macaulay Institute for Soil Research and Scottish Agricultural Colleges Group. 1984. Advisory soil Analysis and Interpretation. Bulletin 1. Aberdeen, Scotland
  9. Mallarino, A. P. 2002. Field calibration for corn for the Mehlich-3 soil phosphorus test with colorimetric and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy determination methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:1928-1934
  10. Mallarino, A. P., D. J. Wittry and P. A. Barbagelata. 2002. Iowa Soil-Test Field Calibration Research update: Potassium and the Mehlich-3 ICP Phosphorus Test. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
  11. Mallarino, A. P. and A. M. Atia. 2005. Correlation of a Resin Membrane soil phosphorus test with corn yield and routine soil tests. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69:266-272 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0266
  12. McIntosh, J. L. 1969. Bray and Morgan soil test extractants modified for testing acid soils from different parent materials. Agron. J. 61:259-265 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100020025x
  13. Mehlich, A. 1953. Determination of P, Ca, Mg, K, Na and NH4. North Carolina Soil Testing Division(Mimeo), N. C. Dept. Agr., Raleigh
  14. Mehich, A. 1978. Influence for fluoride, sulfate and acidity on extractable phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and potassium. Commun. In Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 9(6):455-476 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627809366823
  15. Michaelson, G. J., and C. L. Ping. 1986. Extraction of phosphorus from the major agricultural soils of Alaska. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 17(3):275-297 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628609367713
  16. Munter, R. C. 1990. Advances in soil testing and plant analysis analytical technology. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21:1831-1841 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629009368343
  17. Nathan, M. V., A. Mallarino, R. Elliason, and R. Miller. 2002. ICP vs. Colorimetric determination of Mehlich Ⅲ extractable phosphorus. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33:2432-2433
  18. Kim, M. S. 2008. Evaluation of Available Phosphorus Soil Tests in different Soils. Bull. of Agro-Environment Research 2007, pp 416-436. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. Suwon. Republic of Korea
  19. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2000. Analytical methods of Soil and Plant. NIAST, Suwon, Republic of Korea
  20. Olsen, S. R., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate, pp 421-422. In : A. L. Page(ed.) American Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI
  21. Park, B. G. and J. H. Yoon. 1992. Study on the simplified extraction methods for the analysis of available nutrients in the soil. Res. Rept. RDA(S&F) 34(2):43-47
  22. Park, Y. H., Y. G. Jung, and C. W. Hong. 1980. Simplification of soil tests. RDA annual reports. Suwon, Republic of Korea
  23. Pittman, J. J., H. Zhang, and J. L. Schroder. 2005. Difference of phosphorus inMehlich 3 extracts determined by colorimetirc and spectroscopic methods. Commun. In Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36:1641-1659 https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-200059112
  24. Sharpley. A. N., J. L. Weld., D. B. Beegle, P. J. A. Kleinman, W. J. Gburek, P. A. Moore, Jr., and G. Mullins. 2003. Development of phosphorus indices for nutrient management planning strategies in the United States. J. Soil Water Conserv. 58:137-151
  25. Soltanphour, P. N., and A. P. Schwab. 1977. A New Soil Test for simultaneous Extraction of Macro- and Micro Nutrients in alkaline soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8(3):195-207 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627709366714
  26. Soltanphour, P. N. 1991. Determination of Nutrient Availability and Elemental Toxicity by AB-DTPA soil Test and ICPS. Advances in Soil Science. 16:165-187
  27. Van Lierop, W. 1988. Determination of available phosphorus in acid and calcareous soils with the Kelowna multi-element extractant. Soil Science 146(4):284-291 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198810000-00009
  28. Van Lierop, W., and N. A. Gough. 1989. Extraction of potassium and sodium from acid and calcareous soils with the Kelowna multiple element extractant. Soil Science 69:235-242
  29. Wang, J. J., D. L. Harrell, R. E. Henderson, and P. F. Bell. 2004. Comparison of soil-test extractants for phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in Louisiana soils. Commun. In Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35(1&2):145-160 https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120027640
  30. Wolf, A. and D. Beegle. 1995. Recommended soil tests for macronutrients: phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium. pp 30∼38. In Recommended soil testing procedures for the Northeastern United States. 2nd ed. Northeastern regional publication No. 493. Available at .edu/extension/agnr/soiltesting.htm
  31. Wolf, B. 1982. An improved universal extracting solution and its use for diagnosing soil fertility. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13(12):1003-1005 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628209367330