The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of thermocycling on shear bond strength and mode of failure of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to different porcelain restorations

수 종의 도재 수복물에 부착된 세라믹 브라켓의 전단접착강도와 파절양상에 열순환이 미치는 영향

  • Kang, Sang-Wook (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Byung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 강상욱 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 박수병 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 김성식 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실)
  • Received : 2009.01.29
  • Accepted : 2009.05.30
  • Published : 2009.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of thermocycling and type of porcelain restoration on shear bond strength (SBS) and mode of failure of monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Methods: A total of 60 porcelain discs were made and divided into three equal groups as follows: Ceramco 3, IPS Empress II, Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR. ceramic brackets were bonded to the prepared porcelain surfaces in the same manner. Each group was divided randomly into two subgroups: thermocycled group and non-thermocycled group (control). All samples were tested in shear mode on an universal testing machine. Results: SBS of the non-thermocycled group was clinically acceptable (Ceramco 3: $7.06\;{\pm}\;1.76\;MPa$, IPS Empress II: $7.55\;{\pm}\;2.38\;MPa$, Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR: $7.19\;{\pm}\;1.38\;MPa$). But, SBS of the thermocycled group was significantly reduced (Ceramco 3: $4.88\;{\pm}\;1.00\;MPa$, IPS Empress II: $5.46\;{\pm}\;1.35\;MPa$, Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR: $4.84\;{\pm}\;1.01\;MPa$, p < 0.05). There was no difference between the shear bond strength by type of porcelain restoration. All bonding failure occurred between bracket base and adhesive, except for 2 samples. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the type of porcelain restoration did not affect SBS, but thermocycling weakened SBS. Therefore, the effect of thermocycling should be considered when using ceramic brackets in practice.

본 연구는 도재 수복물에 부착된 단결정 세라믹 브라켓의 전단접착강도와 파절양상에 열순환과 도재 수복물의 종류가 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아보기 위해 시행되었다. 도재전장관에 사용되는 재료들 중 Ceramco 3, Empress II, Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR 세 가지를 선택하여 각 20개씩 총 60개의 시편을 원반형태(두께 2 mm, 직경 12 mm)로 제작하였다. 동일한 접착 술식으로 세라믹 브라켓을 부착한 후 열순환을 시행한 실험군과 시행하지 않은 대조군, 두 군으로 나누어 전단접착강도와 파절양상을 평가하였다. 열순환을 하지 않은 대조군의 전단접착강도는 Ceramco 3는 $7.06\;{\pm}\;1.76\;MPa$, Empress II는 $7.55\;{\pm}\;2.38\;MPa$ 그리고 Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR은 $7.19\;{\pm}\;1.38\;MPa$로 추천되는 전단접착 강도(6 - 8 MPa)에 적합한 강도를 보였으나 열순환을 시행한 실험군은 전단접착강도가 유의하게 감소하였으며(p < 0.05) 열순환 후의 전단접착강도는 Ceramco 3는 $4.88\;{\pm}\;1.00\;MPa$, Empress II는 $5.46\;{\pm}\;1.35\;MPa$ 그리고 Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR은 $4.84\;{\pm}\;1.01\;MPa$로 임상적으로 추천되는 것보다 다소 낮은 값을 보였다. 도재의 종류에 따른 전단접착강도에는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 파절양상은 대조군에서는 모두 브라켓 기저부와 접착제 사이에서 파절이 일어났으며, 실험군에서는 2개의 시편(Ceramco 3과 Zi-ceram/Vintage ZR군에서 각 1개)만이 접착제내 파절을 보였으며 28개의 시편은 브라켓 기저부와 접착제 사이에서 파절이 일어났다. 이상의 연구 결과에서 보았을 때 도재 수복물의 종류에 따른 차이는 없었으나 열순환에 의해 전단접착강도가 약화되므로 실제 임상에서 고려되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kocadereli I, Canay S, Akça K. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:617-20 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113655
  2. Kim SG, Sung JH. Effect of surface treatment of porcelain on tensile bond strength. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:301-8
  3. Zachrisson BU, B$\ddot{u}$y$\ddot{u}$kyilmaz T. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig WL editors. Orthodontics: current principles & techniques. St Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 579-659
  4. Joseph VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:121-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70084-P
  5. Viazis AD, Cavanaugh G, Bevis RR. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:214-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81598-7
  6. Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC, Galil KA. Bonding to porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod 1986;89:194-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90032-1
  7. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  8. Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain - bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:245-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90034-0
  9. Zachrisson BU, B$\ddot{u}$y$\ddot{u}$kyilmaz T. Recent advances in bonding to gold, amalgam, and porcelain. J Clin Orthod 1993;27: 661-75
  10. Barbosa VL, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O, Keith O. Direct bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107:159-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70131-1
  11. Newman SM, Dressler KB, Grenadier MR. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane. Am J Orthod 1984;86:503-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90356-7
  12. Whitlock BO 3rd, Eick JD, Ackerman RJ Jr, Glaros AG, Chappell RP. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:358-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70056-7
  13. Zelos L, Bevis RR, Keenan KM. Evaluation of the ceramic/ceramic interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106: 10-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70016-8
  14. Hayakawa T, Horie K, Aida M, Kanaya H, Kobayashi T, Murata Y. The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1992;8:238-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90092-Q
  15. Lee JN, Lee CW. Shear bond strength and debonding failure mode of ceramic brackets according to the surface treatment of porcelain. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:803-12
  16. Jost-Brinkmann PG, B$\ddot{o}$hme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent 1999;3:243-53
  17. T$\ddot{u}$rkkahraman H, K$\ddot{u}$$\c{o}$$\ddot{u}$kemen HC. Porcelain surface-conditioning techniques and the shear bond strength ofceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:440-3 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl026
  18. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, B$\ddot{u}$y$\ddot{u}$kyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:402-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70124-5
  19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO TR 11405 dental materials - guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1993
  20. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
  21. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:616-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70195-2
  22. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8
  23. Eustaquio R, Garner LD, Moore BK. Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:421-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90132-1
  24. Sparrius O, Grossman ES. Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations in combination with dental and enamel bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:678-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(89)80041-1
  25. Shin WC, Kim JS, Kim JG. The effects of mechanical and thermal fatigue on the shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:175-86
  26. Tanaka T, Kamada T, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. A comparison of water temperatures for thermocycling of metal-bonded resin specimens. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:345-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80372-5
  27. Son JH, Hwang HS. Change of fracture mode of orthodontic resin bracket wings under water immersion and thermocycling. Korean J Orthod 2000;30:475-81
  28. Southan DE, Jorgensen KD. An explanation for the occurrence of internal faults in porcelain jacket crowns. Aust Dent J 1973;18:152-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1973.tb03452.x
  29. Grey NJA, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent 1993;21:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90051-Q
  30. Jeong HC. Fracture strength of zirconia monolithic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:157-64
  31. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthod 1991; 4:17-23
  32. Kao EC, Johnston WM. Fracture incidence on debonding of orthodontic brackets from porcelain veneer laminates. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:631-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90443-Z
  33. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80200-8
  34. Kim JS, Hwang HS, Jeong CM, Jeon YC. A study on the bond strength of resin cements to Empress 2 ceramic. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39:184-96
  35. Elham S J Abu Alhaija, Ahed M S Al-Wahadni. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:386-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm032
  36. Soderquist S, Drummond J, Evans C. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129: 175.e7-175.e12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.023
  37. Akova T, Ozkomur A, Aytutuldu N, Toroglu MS. The effect of food simulants on porcelain-composite bonding. Dent Mater 2007;23:1369-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.021

Cited by

  1. 치과용 금합금에 대한 금속 프라이머 처리와 열순환 처리가 교정용 브라켓의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향 vol.39, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.5.320
  2. 단결정형 세라믹 브라켓의 재접착 시 tribochemical silica coating이 전단접착강도에 미치는 영향 vol.40, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.3.184