The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets

세라믹 브라켓의 재접착이 전단 결합 강도에 미치는 영향

  • Sung, Ji-Young (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 성지영 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 강경화 (원광대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Received : 2009.03.25
  • Accepted : 2009.08.03
  • Published : 2009.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets according to each condition and find an appropriate method to rebond ceramic brackets with proper shear bond strength in clinical practice. Methods: The study consisted of 12 experimental groups, according to the types of brackets, debonding methods, and treatment methods of the bracket base. Shear bond strength was measured, and adhesive residues left on the tooth surface were assessed. The base of the bracket was examined under scanning electron microscopy. Results: The shear bond strength of the monocrystalline ceramic bracket group was significantly higher than thatof the polycrystalline bracket group with only sandblasting (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between groups that used rebonded brackets which were debonded with shear force and debonded with laser (p > 0.05). The shear bond strength of the sandblasted/silane group was significantly higher than that of the selectively grinded group with a low-speed round bur and the sandblasted only group (p < 0.001). The retentive structure was more presented in groups where laser was applied than in groups where shear force was applied to debond brackets prior to rebonding. The bracket bases which were treated before rebonding presented smoother surfaces than new brackets. Conclusions: Shear bond strength could be increased by applying a silane coupling agent after sandblasting before rebonding. Also, the bond strength of the selectively grinded group with a low-speed round bur and the sandblasted group showed acceptable bond strength for clinical orthodontic treatment.

본 연구의 목적은 세라믹 브라켓 제거 후 재접착 시에 브라켓의 종류, 브라켓의 제거 방법, 브라켓 베이스의 처리 방법에 따른 전단 결합 강도를 평가하여 임상에서 적절한 전단 결합 강도를 얻을 수 있는 세라믹 브라켓의 재접착 방법을 찾고자 하는 것이었다. 총 312개의 치아로, 144개는 재접착을 위한 브라켓을 만들기 위해 이용되었고, 나머지 168개는 재생 브라켓의 베이스 처리 후 접착을 위해 사용되었다. 브라켓의 종류(단결정 세라믹 브라켓, 다결정 세라믹 브라켓), 브라켓의 제거 방법(만능 시험기를 이용한 전단력에 의한 제거, 레이저에 의한 제거), 브라켓 베이스의 처리 방법(저속 라운드 버로 선택적 삭제, 샌드블라스팅 처리, 샌드블라스팅 후 실란 처리)에 따라 12개의 실험군과 2개의 대조군(단결정, 다결정 새 브라켓)으로 분류하여 각 군당 12개의 치아를 할당하였다. 각 실험군의 조건에 따라 브라켓을 재접착한 후에 전단 결합 강도와 접착제 잔류 지수를 평가하고 베이스 처리 방법에 따른 브라켓 베이스의 변화를 관찰하였다. 연구 결과, 단결정 세라믹 브라켓군은 샌드블라스팅 처리하고 재접착한 군에서만 다결정 세라믹 브라켓군보다 전단 결합 강도가 유의하게 높았다 (p < 0.05). 전단력으로 브라켓을 제거하고 재접착한 군과 레이저로 브라켓을 제거하고 재접착한 군 간에 전단 결합 강도는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 브라켓 종류와 제거 방법에 관계없이 샌드블라스팅 후 실란 처리하고 재접착한 군은 저속 라운드 버로 선택적 삭제하고 재접착한 군과 샌드블라스팅 처리하고 재접착한 군보다 전단 결합 강도가 유의하게 높았다 (p < 0.001). 베이스 형태는 전단력으로 제거한 군보다 레이저로 제거한 군에서 더 잘 유지되었으며, 재접착을 위해 베이스 처리된 모든 브라켓에서 새 브라켓보다 부드러운 표면을 나타내었다. 이상의 결과를 토대로, 제거된 세라믹 브라켓에 샌드블라스팅 후 실란을 처리하고 재접착하는 것이 전단 결합 강도를 증가시켰으며, 저속 라운드 버를 이용한 선택적 삭제나 샌드블라스팅만 처리하여 재접착하는 방법도 임상적으로 수용 가능한 결합 강도를 보였다고 할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arici S, Minors C. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:327-34 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.3.327
  2. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. St Louis: Elsevier; 2005. p. 595
  3. Kew KK, Djeng SK. Recycling ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:44-7
  4. Yim JB, Lee JW, Cha KS. Shear bond strength of recycled orthodontic brackets treated by variable reconditioning methods. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:569-79
  5. Shur CH, Choi EA. A comparative study of bond strength of recycled brackets. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:641-57
  6. Egan FR, Alexander SA, Cartwright GE. Bond strength of re-bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:64-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70164-6
  7. Chung CH, Fadem BW, Levitt HL, Mante FK. Effects of two adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:295-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.104810
  8. Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, VonWald L, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121: 521-5 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.123042
  9. Martina R, Laino A, Cacciafesta V, Cantiello P. Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:629-36 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.6.629
  10. Buchman DJ. Effects of recycling on metallic direct-bond orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1980;77:654-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90157-8
  11. Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacialial Orthop 1992;102:215-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81055-8
  12. Gaffey PG, Major PW, Glover K, Grace M, Koehler JR. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1995;65:351-7
  13. Chung CH, Friedman SD, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacialial Orthop 2002;122:282-7 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125994
  14. Toroglu MS, Yaylali S. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacialial Orthop 2008;134:181-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.012
  15. Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinşahin A, Karabulut E. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:314-21
  16. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and micro-etched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:276-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70297-5
  17. Reynolds IR. A review of direct bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8
  18. Flores DA, Caruso JM, Scott GE, Jeiroudi MT. The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study. Angle Orthod 1990;60:269-76
  19. Winchester LJ. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:293-305 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.4.293
  20. Swartz ML. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:82-8
  21. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:145-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70008-Z
  22. Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE. Thermal debracketing of orthodontic resins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:56-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70032-8
  23. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: An in vitro study: Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:263-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81604-X
  24. Boyer DB, Engelhardt G, Bishara SE. Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:262-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70019-6
  25. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:152-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70007-W
  26. Mimura H, Deguchi T, Obata A, Yamagishi T, Ito M. Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:267-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70020-X
  27. International Standards Organization. ISO/TR 106/SC 1/WG 11. Dentistry: Dental materials - Testing of adhesive to tooth structure. 2003
  28. Forsberg CM, Hagberg C. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. Br J Orthod 1992;19:183-9 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.183
  29. Wang WN, Meng CL, Tarng TH. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacialial Orthop 1997;111:374-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80019-4
  30. Bishara SE. Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:595-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70212-5
  31. Bowen RL, Rodriquez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:378-87
  32. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of art. Quintessence Int 1985;16:5-12
  33. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  34. Van der Veen JH, Jongebloed WL, Dijk F, Purdell-Lewis DJ, van de Poel AC. SEM study of six retention systems for resin- to-metal-bonding. Dent Mater 1988;4:266-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80021-6
  35. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics 4th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby Co.; 2007. p. 415
  36. Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:675-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.040
  37. Jena AK, Duggal R, Mehrotra AK. Physical properties and clinical characteristics of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. Trends Biomater Artif organs 2007;20:101-15
  38. Eliades T, Lekka M, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:10-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70094-X
  39. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FJ, Standing KG. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacialial Orthop 1993;103:155-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81765-2

Cited by

  1. 단결정형 세라믹 브라켓의 재접착 시 tribochemical silica coating이 전단접착강도에 미치는 영향 vol.40, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.3.184
  2. The effects of primer precuring on the shear bond strength between gold alloy surfaces and metal brackets vol.34, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq163