DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative evaluation of water vapor transmission rate of PVA/Dextran blended hydrogel using European Pharmacopiea and Japanese Industrial Standards method

유럽 약전과 일본 산업기준 규격 방식에 의한 폴리비닐 알코올 및 덱스트란 함유 하이드로겔의 투습률 비교평가

  • Published : 2009.04.27

Abstract

To compare the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of PVA/Dextran blended hydrogel obtained by European Pharmacopiea (EP) and Japanese Industrial Standards 1099 (JIS) method, the hydrogels with various PVA/Dextran rates were prepared and their WVTR values were then checked. As dextran in the hydrogel was increased, the WVTR of hydrogel was increased. The WVTR of hydrogels were 660-1500 and $730-1900\;g/m^2$-day in EP and JIS method, respectively. There were no significant differences between the WVTRs of the hydrogels obtained by EP and those obtained by JIS method. Thus, JIS method was recommended as a WVTR method of hydrogel due to relatively simpler and shorter time.

Keywords

References

  1. T.D.Turner, Hospital usage of absorbent dressings, Pharmaceutical J., 222, 421-424 (1979).
  2. C.D. Hinman and H. Maibach, Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds, Nature, 200, 377-378 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200377a0
  3. G.D. Winter, Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig, Nature, 193, 293-294 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/193293a0
  4. R.J. Morin and N.L. Tomaselli, Interactive dressings and topical agents, Clin. Plast. Surg., 34, 643-658 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.07.004
  5. Z. Ajji, G. Mirjalili, A. Alkhatab and H. Dada, Use of electron beam for the production of hydrogel dressings, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 77(2), 200-202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.05.016
  6. A.S. Hoffman, Hydrogels for biomedical applications, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev., 43, 3-12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00239-3
  7. T.S. Stashak, E. Farstvedt and A. Othic, Update on wound dressings: Indications and best use, Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice, 3(2), 148-163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctep.2004.08.006
  8. N.F.S. Watson and W. Dabell, Wound dressings, The Foundation Years, 2(1), 38-41 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1053/S1744-1889(06)70046-9
  9. M.G Cascone, S. Maltinti and N. Barbani, Effect of chitosan and dextran on the properties of poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels, J. Mater. Sci.-Mater., 10, 431-435 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008983215833
  10. J.H. Yeo, K.G. Lee, H.C. Kim, Y.L. Oh, A.J. Kim and S.Y. Kim, The effects of PVA/chitosan/fibroin (PCF)-blended spongy sheets on wound healing in rats, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 23(10), 1220-1223 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.23.1220
  11. W.C. Lin, D.G. Yu and M.C. Yang, Blood compatibility of novel PGA (poly glutamic acid) / poly vinyl alcohol hydrogels, Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces, 47(1), 43-49 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.11.013
  12. M.H. Huang and M.C. Yang, Evaluation of glucan/poly (vinyl alcohol) blend wound dressing using rat models, Int. J. Pharm., 346, 38-46 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.06.021
  13. M.T. Razzak, D. Darwis and Z. Sukirno, Irridation of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone blended hydrogel for wound dressing, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 62, 107-113 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00427-3
  14. M. Kokabi, M. Sirousazar and Z.M. Hassan, PVA-clay nanocomposite hydrogels for wound dressing, Eur. Polym. J., 43, 773-781 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.11.030
  15. D. Queen, J.D.S. Gaylor, J.H. Evans, J.M. Courtney and W.H. Reid, The preclinical evaluation of the water vapour transmission rate through burn wound dressings, Biomaterials, 8, 367–371 (1987).