대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제47권2호
  • /
  • Pages.215-221
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

임플란트 시술환자의 시술 전.후의 저작능력과 삶의 질 비교

Comparison of chewing ability and quality of life before and after the dental implantation

  • 김경원 (영남대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 이경수 (영남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 강복수 (영남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김우식 (영남대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이희경 (영남대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Kim, Kyeong-Won (Department of Health, Graduate School, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health) ;
  • Lee, Kyeong-Soo (Department of Health, Graduate School, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health) ;
  • Kang, Pock-Soo (Department of Health, Graduate School, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Shik (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Kyeong (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
  • 발행 : 2009.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 임플란트 시술을 받는 환자가 크게 증가하는 시점에 임플란트 시술환자를 시술 전후로 추적 조사하여 시술 전후의 저작능력을 평가하고, 시술 전후의 환자 만족도와 삶의 질의 변화를 비교하기 위하여 연구를 수행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 대구광역시와 울산광역시에 있는 6개의 치과 의원에서 2006년 12월부터 2007년 10월까지 임플란트 시술을 받은 20세 이상의 성인 환자 109명을 대상으로 임플란트 시술 전후에 설문조사를 실시하여 임플란트 치료선택동기, 저작능력, 환자만족도, 권유의향, 삶의 질을 비교분석하였다. 결과: 임플란트 선택 동기는 '치아기능의 회복을 위하여'가 45.9%로 가장 많았고, 치료 시 가장 걱정되는 것은 '치료실패와 부작용'이 38.5%로 가장 많았다. 임플란트 시술에 대한 만족도는 시술 전 30.37점에서 시술 후 45.01점으로 시술 전후의 만족도 점수가 유의한 차이가 있었으며(P<.001), 치료에 대한 만족도는 '만족한다'라고 답한 사람이 91.8%였으며, 연구대상자의 89%가 가족이나 주위에 임플란트를 '권유할 의향이 있다'라고 응답했다. 섭취가능 식품에 대한 설문을 이용하여 측정한 저작능력 점수는 임플란트 시술 전 15.24점에서 임플란트 시술 후 19.11점으로 시술 전후의 저작능력 점수가 유의한 차이가 있었으며(P<.001), 삶의 질 점수도 임플란트 시술 전 9.99점에서 시술 후 11.17점으로 시술 전후 유의한 차이가 있었다(P<.001). 결론: 이 연구 결과를 통해 치아 질환, 치아상실로 인하여 저하된 저작 능력이 임플란트를 통하여 유의하게 개선됨을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 임플란트를 시술한 상실치아 수나 상실 부위에 따른 임플란트 시술환자의 만족도에 대한 연구가 필요하며, 시술 후 장기간의 경과 후 평가 및 연구대상자 확대를 통한 연구를 시행할 필요가 있다고 생각한다.

Statement of problem: Recently the populations of patients receiving implant surgery are greatly increase for maintaining oral health. Purpose: This study was conducted for implanted patients to assess the chewing ability patient satisfaction level and changes in quality of life before and after the implant surgery. Material and methods: The current study subjected 109 adult patients, older than 20 years of age, who received implant surgery from December, 2006 to October, 2007 at the 6 dental clinics located at Daegu and Ulsan metropolitan cities. Twice of surveys were conducted for the patients before and after receiving the dental implant surgery. Results: As the motivation of receiving implant surgery, 45.9% of the patients selected the surgery for the chance o "f chewing function recovery", and " failure of treatment and complications" was found to be the most worrisome at the time of surgery by recording 38.5%.The satisfaction level before the implant surgery scored 30.37, while the score was increased to 45.01 after the surgery by showing a significant difference before and after receiving the surgery(P<.001). Regard on the surgery, 91.8% of the patients responded as "Satisfy", and 89% of the study subjects responded that they have willingness to recommend the surgery to their families and friends. The chewing ability score measured by using the surveys on edible foods, the score before the surgery was 15.24, while the score was increased to 19.11 after the surgery by showing a significant difference before and after receiving the surgery(P<.001). The quality of life score was also found to be increased to 11.17 after the surgery from 9.99 before the surgery by showing a significant difference(P<.001). Conclusion: In a future, the studies on the numbers of implanted loss teeth and the location of tooth loss are necessary, more long-term follow study are needed, and it is thought to be necessary to enlarge the sample size of subjects in conducting the studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Pack IS. A Study of the health promoting lifestyle. Department of Nursing, The Graduate School of Pusan National University. 1995
  2. Lee HN, Kim EM. Oral heal related quality of life of women college students. J Korean Acad Dental Hygiene Education 2005;5:89-99
  3. Boretti G, Bickel M, Geering AH. A review of masticatory ability and efficiency. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:400-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80381-6
  4. Kang JW. The survey of oral health and the nutritional status of the elderly in Seoul. Department of Food and Nutrition. The Graduate School, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea 2003:2
  5. Gilbert GH, Foerster U, Duncan RP. Satisfaction with chewing ability in a diverse sample of dentate adults. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:15-27 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00207.x
  6. Horwath CC. Chewing difficulty and dietary intake in the elderly. J Nutr Elder 1989;9:17-24 https://doi.org/10.1300/J052v09n02_03
  7. Dormenval V, Mojon P, Budtz-Jorgensen E. Associations between self-assessed masticatory ability, nutritional status, prosthetic status and salivary flow rate in hospitalized elders. Oral Dis 1999;5:32-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.1999.tb00061.x
  8. Choe JS, Jeong SH. The development of strategies for the promotion of oral health research. Korea Institute for Health and Social 2000;55-77
  9. Cushing AM, Sheiham A, Maizels J. Developing sociodental indicators--the social impact of dental disease. Community Dent Health 1986;3:3-17
  10. Willits FK, Crider DM. Health rating and life satisfaction in the later middle years. J Gerontol 1988;43:S172-6
  11. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ 1990;54:680-7
  12. McGrath C, Bedi R. An evaluation of a new measure of oral health related quality of life--OHQoL-UK(W). Community Dent Health 2001;18:138-43
  13. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988;25:25-36
  14. Waerhaug J, Philos D. Periodontology and partial prosthesis. Int Dent J 1968;18:101-7
  15. Carr AB, Laney WR. Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prostheses and patients with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:101-8
  16. Wetherell JD, Smales RJ. Partial denture failures: a longterm clinical survey. J Dent 1980;8:333-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90049-4
  17. Chung HG. Tissue Responses Around Two Types of Dental Impalnt in Beagle Dog. Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University. 2000; pp 2
  18. Carl E Misch. Contemporary implant dentistry 2nd. Daehannarae publishing, seoul, 2000; Chapter 1
  19. Baek JW. Dental Implant. Korean society for Engineering Education 2002;1:87-90
  20. Osstem implant. Quarterly Reports. 2006; NOV. 14
  21. Yu EM. A Study on Implant Patients' Satisfaction and Mastication Ability - Compared to Denture Patients. Department of Health Management, Graduate School of Health and Environment, Yonsei University Korea. 2005
  22. Lee HJ. A Study on the Satisfaction with the Dental Services of the Implant Treatment Patients Visiting the Dental Hospital. Department of Hygienic Science The Graduate School, Gatholic University of Daegu. 2005
  23. North Texas Periodontal Associates. cited 2007 Nov.1; Available from; URL: http://www.ntxpa.com
  24. Hirai T, Ishijima T, Koshino H, Anzai T. Age-related change of masticatory function in complete denture wearers: evaluation by a sieving method with peanuts and a food intake questionnaire method. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:454-60
  25. Lawton MP. The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: a revision. J Gerontol 1975;30:85-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/30.1.85
  26. Levi A, Psoter WJ, Agar JR, Reisine ST, Taylor TD. Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:113-20
  27. Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1167-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4
  28. Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:574-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70008-8
  29. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000;79:1659-63 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790090401
  30. Sonoyama W, Kuboki T, Okamoto S, Suzuki H, Arakawa H, Kanyama M, Yatani H, Yamashita A. Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resinbonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:359-64 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130403.x
  31. Shin CH. A Study upon Analyzing Patient'Satisfactions by the Areas of his/her Dental Losses Followed by Dental Implanting. Graduate School of Public Health Yonsei University. 2004
  32. Chung JY. Factirs Impacting on the Satisfaction of Implant Patients in Daegu and Kyungpook Areas. Department of Public Health Graduate School of Environment & Public Health Yeungnam University. 2005
  33. Kim JS, Kim SG, Kim BO, Kim DG, Choe DG, Choe HY, Kim JU, Lee JY, Lee HB, Park JY. Assessment of satisfaction of dental implant surgery. J Korean Acad Implant Dent 2006;25:41-60
  34. Lee YK. Effect of Denture Placement on Nutrient Status and Quality of Life in the Urban Elderly. Department of Medical Science, Graduate School, Yeungnam University. 2002