A Study on the 'Classroom Space Metaphors' in Classroom Research

교실 연구의 최근 동향과 '교실 공간 메타포' 연구

  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Recently, there is a matter of common interests in 'classroom' because many pedagogues and teachers feel urgently the understanding of educational field. This study aims to investigates classroom researches for the last twenty years, asserts the theme 'the spatiality of classroom' which is important to understand diverse point of views in classroom theories and is overlooked at the same time, and considers it in terms of 'classroom space metaphors'. Specially, the author reviews the recent trend in classroom researches, and names it 'classroom theory' in that it deals with classroom not as a means but as an object and has undergone methodological transition. In the mean time, the author lays great emphasis on 'the spatiality of classroom' which is important to expand classroom theory and is overlooked at the same time. To approach this, the author categorizes the classroom space metaphors of existing classroom researches into 'classroom as a work space' and 'classroom as a learning space' by drawing the concept 'metaphor'. And then the author presents new metaphor 'classroom as a lived space' on the basis of the recent classroom theory, and tries to abstract its educational significance in classroom by way of Thirdspace.

최근 국내외에서 교육의 현장에 대한 이해가 절실해지면서 '교실'에 대한 관심이 크게 부상하고 있다. 본 연구는 영어권을 중심으로 교실 연구의 최근 동향을 검토한 다음, 교실의 이해를 위해 긴요하지만 지금까지 다분히 간과되어 온 주제로서 '교실의 공간성' 문제를 제기하고 이를 '교실 공간 메타포'를 통해 접근하는 데에 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 영어권의 최근 동향에 주목하면서 최근의 교실 연구에서는 교실 그 자체를 수단이 아닌 목적으로 다루고 있으며 방법론에 있어서도 모종의 전환을 보이고 있다는 점을 확인할 수 있었고, 이를 근거로 최근의 일단의 교실 연구들을 염두에 두고 '교실론'의 설정 가능성을 제안하였다. 다음으로 최근의 교실론의 지평을 확장함에 있어서 매우 중요하면서도 다분히 간과되었던 주제가 바로 '교실의 공간성'에 대한 논의임을 제기하였다. 여기에 접근하기 위해 연구자는 '메타포' 개념을 동원하였고, 전통적 교실 연구에서 상정하는 교실 공간 메타포를 크게 '작업장으로서의 교실'과 '연극 무대로서의 교실'로 범주화할 수 있었다. 그리고, 최근의 교실론을 바탕으로 '삶의 공간으로서의 교실'이라는 새로운 메타포를 제시하면서 여기에 내포된 교육적 함의를 제3공간에 대한 논의와 연결시켜 도출해 보고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고영규, 1995, 수업에서의 의사소통 과정에 대한 문화기술적 연구, 고려대학교 박사학위논문
  2. 권민철(역), 2005, 수업 현상학, 학지사(Sunkel, w., 1996, Phänomenologie des Unterrichts)
  3. 권점례, 2007, '초등학교 수학 교실에서 사회적 관행과 정체성의 상호작용 분석,' 한국수학교육학회지, 46(4), 389-406
  4. 김동원, 2007, '틀의 차이를 극복하기 -수학 교실에서의 논증분석 연구-,' 한국수학교육학회지, 46(2), 173-192
  5. 김부윤.이지성, 2009, '수학 교실과 포스트모더니즘,' 한국수학교육학회지, 48(2), 169-182
  6. 김혜숙, 2005, '지리과 교실수업연구를 위한 이론적 탐색,' 한국지리환경교육학회지, 13(2), 275-291
  7. 김혜숙, 2006, 교실 생태학적 관점에 근거한 중등 지리 수업의 질적 사례 연구, 고려대학교 박사학위논문
  8. 박병학(역), 1994, 수업과정의 인간화, 교육과학사(吉本均, 1987, 授業の原則)
  9. 박영욱, 2009, 의미와 무의미의 경계에서, 김영사
  10. 송준수.김미영, 1993, '교실 내 언어적 상호작용에 관한 연구,' 중등교육연구, 5, 117-127
  11. 오필석.이선경.김찬종, 2007, '지식 공유의 관점에서 본 과학 교실 담화의 사례,'한국과학교육학회지, 27(4), 297-308
  12. 이용숙.이재분.소경희.전경미, 1990, 초등학교 교육현상에 대한 문화기술적 연구, 한국교육개발원
  13. 이정화.이지헌(역), 2003, 하버마스, 비판 이론, 교육, 교육과학사(Young, R. E., 1990, A Critical Teory of Education: Habermas and Our Children's Future, 1990, Pearson Education)
  14. 이혁규, 1996, 중학교 사회과 교실 수업에 대한 일상생활기술적 사례 연구, 서울대 박사학위논문
  15. 이혁규, 2009, '교육현장개선을 위한 실행연구방법,' 교육비평, 25, 196-213
  16. 이홍우.박철홍.이환기.임병덕.차미란(역), 1991, 경험과 이해의 성장, 교육과학사(Hamlyn, D. W., 1978, Experience and the Growth of Understanding, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London)
  17. 임은진, 2009, '상황인지론에 근거한 지리교육의 재개념화,' 한국지리환경교육학회지, 17(2), 145-162
  18. 조영달, 1992, '정형화된 사회적 공간에서의 한국적 상호작용 유형의 이해,'사회와 교육, 16, 309-363
  19. Ames, C., and Ames, R., 1984, Systems of Student and Teacher Motivations: Toward a Qualitative Definition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 535-556 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.535
  20. Anderson, L. M., Brubaker, N. L., Alleman-Brooks, J., and Duffy, G. G., 1985, A qualitative study of seatwork in first grade classrooms, Elementary School Journal, 86, 123-140 https://doi.org/10.1086/461438
  21. Barnes, D., 1976, From Communication to Curriculum, Penguin Books
  22. Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E., 2006, Discourse and Identity, Edinburgh University Press
  23. Bernstein, 1975, Class, Codes and Control, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
  24. Bhabha, H. K., 1994, The location of culture, Routledge, London
  25. Brophy, J. E., 1983, Conceptualizing student motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18, 200-215 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529274
  26. Brown, A. L., and Reeve, R. A., 1987, Bandwidths of competence: the role of supportive contexts in learning and development, in Liben, L. S.(ed.), Development and Learning: Conflict or Congruence?, Erlbaum, NJ, 173-224
  27. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P., 1993, Stolen knowledge, Educational Technology, 10-15
  28. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., 1989, Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42
  29. Burbules, N. C., 2006, Rethinking dialogue in Networked Spaces, Cultural Studies $\leftrightarrow$ Critical Methodologies, 6(1), 107-122 https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605282817
  30. Burbules, N. C. and Bruce, B. C., 2001, Theory and research on teaching as dialogue, in Richardson, V.(ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, American Educational Research Association, 1102-1121
  31. Carter, K., 1986, Classroom management as cognitive problem solving: toward teacher comprehension in teacher Education, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
  32. Cohen, E., Intili, T., and Robbins, S., 1979, Task and authority: a sociological view of classroom management, in Duke, D.(ed.), Classroom Management, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 116-143
  33. Cohen, E., 1986, Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom, Teachers College Press, New York
  34. Cresswell, T., 2004, Place: A Short Introduction, Blackwell Publishing, MA
  35. Cross, K. P., 1998, Classroom research: implementing the scholarship of teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 75, 5-12
  36. Cross, K. P., and Steadman, M. H., 1996, Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
  37. Doyle, W., 1978, Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness, Review of Research in Education, 5, 163-198
  38. Doyle, W., 1986, Classroom organization and management, in Wittrock, M. C.(ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd Edition, MacMillan, New York, 392-433
  39. Doyle, W., 1988, Work in mathematics classes: the context of students' thinking during instruction, Educational Psychologist, 23, 167-180 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_6
  40. Engestrom, 1999, Communication, discourse and activity, The Communication Review, 1(1&2), 165-185
  41. Gadamer, H. G., 1994, Truth and method, in Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G.(eds.), Truth and Method, Continuum International, New York
  42. Green, J. L., Weade, R., and Graham, K., 1988, Lesson construction and student participation: a sociolinguistic analysis, in Green, J. L. and Harker, J. O.(eds.), Multiple Perspective Analysis of Classroom Discourse, Ablex, NJ, 11-48
  43. Greeno, J. G., 1989, A perspective on thinking, American Psychologist, 44, 134-141 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.134
  44. Gutierrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., and Tejeda, C., 1999, Rethinking diversity: hybridity and hybrid language practices in the Third Space, Mind Culture and Activity, 6(4), 286-303 https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
  45. Gutierrez, K. D. and Rymes, B., 1995, Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. board of education, Havard Educational Review, 65(3), 445-471 https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384
  46. Henson, K. T., 1996, Teachers as researchers, in John, S. P.(ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: a project of the association of teacher educators, 2nd Edition, MacMillan Publishing, 53-64
  47. Johnston, R., J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., and Watts, M., 2000, The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th Edition, Basil Blackwell Publisher, New York
  48. Kamberelis, G., 2001, Producing heteroglossic classroom cultures through hybrid discourse practice, Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 85-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00044-9
  49. Lefebvre, H., translated by Nicholson-Smith, D., 1991, The Production of Space, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
  50. Lemesianou, C. A., 1999, The Geographies of Discourse and Lived Experience: A Communication Approach, (Ph. D Thesis), New Brunswick, NJ
  51. Marshall, H. H., 1987a, Building a learning orientation, Theory and Practice, 26, 8-14 https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543243
  52. Marshall, H. H., 1987b, Motivational strategies of three fifth-grade teachers, Elementary School Journal, 88, 137-152
  53. Marshall, H. H., 1988, In pursuit of learning-oriented classrooms, Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 85-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90010-8
  54. Marshall, H. H., 1990, Beyond the workplace metaphor: the classroom as a learning setting, Theory into Practice, 29(2), 94-101 https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543438
  55. Merrifield, A., 1993, Place and space: a Lefebvrian reconciliation, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(4), 516-531 https://doi.org/10.2307/622564
  56. Pratt, M. L., 1987, Linguistic utopias, in Fabb, N., Attridge, D., Durant, A., and MacCabe, C.(eds.), The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, Methuen, New York
  57. Shuell, T. J., 1986, Cognitive conceptions of learning, Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004411
  58. Shulman, L., 1986, Paradigms and research programmes in the study of teaching, in Wittrock, M. C.(ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, MacMillan, New York, 3-36
  59. Spranger, E., 1958, Der geborene Erzieher, Heidelberg
  60. Tajfel, H., 1982, Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  61. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J., 1986, The Social identity theory of intergroup behaviour, in Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G.(eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Nelson, Chicago
  62. Vadeboncoeu, J. A., Hirst, E., and Kostogriz, A., 2006, Spatializing sociocultural research: a reading or mediation and meaning as third spaces, Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(3), 163-175 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1303_1
  63. Vonsniadou, S. and Brewer, W. F., 1987, Theories of knowledge restructuring in development, Review of Educational Research, 57, 51-68 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057001051
  64. Vygotsky, L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process, Havard University Press, Cambridge, MA
  65. Wittrock, M. C., 1986, Students' thought processes, in Wittrock, M. C.(ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd Edition, New York: MacMillan, 297-314