한국지구과학회지 (Journal of the Korean earth science society)

  • 제30권7호
  • /
  • Pages.824-833
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-6692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4518(eISSN)
한국지구과학회 (The Korean Earth Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

청양 지자기관측소에서 획득된 지자기전달함수와 분극값의 시간변동성에 대한 연구

A Study on Temporal Variations of Geomagnetic Transfer Functions and Polarization Values Obtained at Cheongyang Geomagnetic Observatory

  • 양준모 (한국해양연구원 심해.해저자원연구부) ;
  • 이희순 (경인교육대학교 과학교육과) ;
  • 오석훈 (강원대학교 지구시스템공학부)
  • Yang, Jun-Mo (Deep Sea and Marine Resource Research Division, Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Heui-Soon (Department of Science Education, Gyeongin National University of Education) ;
  • Oh, Seok-Hoon (Department of Geosystem Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지진전조현상을 모니터링 하기 위해 기상청이 운영하고 있는 청양 지자기관측소에서 총 6개월간 획득된 지자기장 자료를 분석하였다. 지자기 3성분 자료로부터 지하의 전기비저항 변화를 반영하는 전달함수 및 분극값을 계산하였고, 이를 동일기간 발생한 지진이벤트와 비교하였다. 전달함수의 경우 일별 전달함수 값의 변화가 상당히 심하였으며, 발생한 지진 및 Kp 인덱스와의 상관성을 찾기 어려웠다. ULF 대역 자기장은 지진발생 전 뚜렷한 분극값의 증가가 관찰되었으나, 지진이 발생하지 않은 기간에도 이러한 변동 패턴이 나타났다. 따라서 이러한 분극값의 변화는 지진 전조현상으로 단정하기에는 한계가 있고, 향후 타 관측소 자료의 추가적인 확보 및 분석을 통해 과거 발생한 일정규모 이상의 지진과 관련성을 분석할 필요가 있다.

We analyzed a total of six months of geomagnetic data obtained at Cheonyang observatory, which is operated by Korean Meteorological Administration, to monitor earthquake precursors. Geomagnetic transfer functions (GTFs) and polarization values, which reflect the time-variations of the resistivity of subsurface, were estimated from 3-component geomagnetic data. The time-variant fluctuations were compared with the earthquake events occurred in the same period. Now that the daily GTFs show fairly irregular variations, we can not identify any correlation with the already occurred earthquakes and Kp index. On the other hand, we detect clear increases of the Ultra-Low-Frequency (ULF) band polarization values before the earthquakes, but the similar features are also observed even though the earthquake did not occur. This result may indicate that these time-variations are not just due to the earthquake precursor. For further understanding about these results, we need to investigate the relationship between the previous earthquake events and the geomagnetic data of other observatories.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 양준모, 이덕기, 권병두, 윤용훈, 2004, 이천관측소에서 측정된 지자기장 및 지자기 전달함수의 시간적 변동성. 한국지구과학회지, 25, 604-614
  2. 양준모, 권병두, 이덕기, 윤용훈, 2005, BI (Bounded Influence)와 RMP(Rejection based on Median Power) 기법을 이용한 MT 전달함수의 로버스트 추정. 한국지구시스템공학회지, 42, 419-428
  3. 이춘기, 이희순, 권병두, 오석훈, 이덕기, 2003, 단층대의 전기전도도 변동에 의한 ULF 전자기장 교란. 물리탐사, 6, 87-94
  4. Chen, P.F., 1981, A search for correlation between time change in transfer functions and seismic activity in north Taiwan. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 33, 635-643 https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.33.635
  5. Chen, P.F. and Fung, P.C.W., 1993, Time changes in geomagnetic transfer functions at Lunping before and after the 1986 Hualian earthquake (Ms=7.6). Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 45, 251-259 https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.45.251
  6. Chen K.J., Chiu, B., and Line, C.H., 2006, A search for a correlation between time change in transfer function and seismic energy release in northern Taiwan. Earth, Planet and Space, 58, 981-991 https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352603
  7. Fraser-Smith, A.C., Bernardi, A., McGill, P.R., Ladd, M.E., Helliwell, R.A., and Villard Jr., O.G., 1990, Low-frequency magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 17, 1465-1468 https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i009p01465
  8. Fenoglio, M.A., Johnston, M.J.S., and Byerlee, J.D., 1995, Magnetic and electric fields associated with changes in high pore pressure in fault zone: Application to the Loma Prieta ULF emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 12951-12958 https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00076
  9. Fujita, S., 1990, Monitoring of time changes of conductivity anomaly transfer functions at Japanese magnetic observatory network. Memoirs of the Kakioka Magnetic Observatory, 23, 53-87
  10. Gong, S.J., 1985, Anomalous changes in transfer functions and the 1976 Tangsan earthquake (Ms=7.8). Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 37, 503-508
  11. Hattori, K., Takahashi, I., Yoshino, C., Isezaki, N., Iwasaki, H., Harada, M., Korepanov, K., Molchanov, O., Hayakawa, M., Noda, Y., Nagao, T., and Uyeda, S., 2004, ULF geomagnetic field measurements in Japan and some recent results associated with Iwakeken Nairiku Hokunu earthquakes in 1998. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 481-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2003.09.019
  12. Hayakawa, M., Kawate, R., Molchanov, O.A., and Yumoto, K., 1996, Results of ultra-low-frequency magnetic field measurements during Guam earthquake of 8 August 1993. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 241-244 https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02863
  13. Hayakawa, M., Itoh, T., and Smirnova, N., 1999, Fractal analysis of ULF geomagnetic data associated with the Guam earthquake on August 8, 1993. Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 2797-2800 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL005367
  14. Hayakawa, M., Hattori, K., and Ohta, K., 2007, Monitoring of ULF (ultra-low-frequency) geomagnetic variations associated with earthquakes. Sensors, 7, 1108-1122 https://doi.org/10.3390/s7071108
  15. Ida, Y., Yang, D., Li, Q., Sun, H., and Hayakawa, M., 2008, Detection of ULF electromagnetic emissions as a precursor to an earthquake in China with an improved polarization analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 8, 775-777 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-775-2008
  16. Molchanov, O.A., Kopytenko, Y.A., Voronov, P.M., Kopytenko, E.A., Matiashvili, T.G., Fraser-Smith, A.C., and Bernadi, A., 1992, Results of ULF magnetic field measurements near epicenters of Spitak (Ms=6.9) and Loma Prieta (Ms=7.1) earthquakes: Comparative analysis. Geophysical Research Letters, 19, 1495-1498 https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL01152
  17. Molchanov, O.A. and Hayakawa, M., 1995, Generation of ULF electromagnetic emissions by microfracturing. Geophysical Research Letters, 22, 3091-3094 https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00781
  18. Ohta, K., Watanane, N., and Hayakawa, M., 2005, The observation of ULF emissions at Nakatsugawa in possible association with the 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake. Earth, Planet and Space, 57, 1003-1008
  19. Rikitake, T., 1979, Changes in the direction of magnetic vector of short-period geomagnetic variations before the 1972 Sitka, Alaska, earthquake. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 31, 441-448 https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.31.441
  20. Rikitake, T. and Hokura, Y., 1985, Solid earth geomagnetism.Terrapub, Tokyo, Japan, 400 p
  21. Scholtz, C.H., Sykes,L.R., and Aggarwal, Y.P., 1973, Earthquake prediction: A physical basis. Science, 181, 803-810 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4102.803
  22. Vozzof, K., 1972, The magnetotelluric in the exploration of sedimentary basin. Geophysics, 37, 98-141 https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440255
  23. Yanagihara, K., 1972, Secular variation of the electrical conductivity anomaly in the central part of Japan. Memoirs of the Kakioka Magnetic Observatory, 15, 1-11
  24. Yanagihara, K. and Nagano, T., 1976, Time change of transfer function in the central Japan anomaly of conductivity with special reference to earthquake occurrences. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 28, 157-163 https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.28.157

피인용 문헌

  1. Earthquake Wave Propagation Using Staggered-grid Finite-difference Method in the Model of the Antarctic Region vol.32, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.6.640
  2. Sakurajima volcano eruption detected by GOCI and geomagnetic variation analysis - A case study of the 18 Aug, 2013 eruption - vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2014.30.2.9
  3. An Analysis of Geomagnetic Variations Related to Earthquakes Location which Occurred in and around the Korean Peninsula from 2012 to 2014 vol.36, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.7.649