Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

The Influence of Attachment Type on the Distribution of Occlusal Force in Implant Supported Overdentures

하악 임플란트 오버덴쳐에서 어태치먼트 종류에 따른 응력분포

  • Sung, Chai-Ryun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 성채련 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실)
  • Received : 2009.08.05
  • Accepted : 2009.12.25
  • Published : 2009.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Implant supported overdenture is accepted widely as a way to restore edentulous ridge providing better retention and support of dentures. Various types of attachment for overdenture have been developed. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of attachment type in implant overdentures on the biomechanical stress distribution in the surrounding bone, prosthesis and interface between implant and bone. Material and methods: Finite element analysis method was used. Average CT image of mandibular body(Digital $Korea^{(R)}$, KISTI, Korea) was used to produce a mandibular model. Overdentures were placed instead of mandibular teeth and 2mm of mucosa was inserted between the overdenture and mandible. Two implants($USII^{(R)}$, Osstem, Korea) were placed at both cuspid area and 4 types of overdenture were fabricated ; ball and socket, Locator, magnet and bar type. Load was applied on the from second premolar to second molar tooth area. 6 times of finite element analyses were performed according to the direction of the force $90^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$ and unilateral or bilateral force applied. The stress at interface between implants and bone, and prosthesis and the bone around implants ware compared using von Mises stress. The results were explained with color coded graphs based on the equivalent stress to distinguish the force distribution pattern and the site of maximum stress concentration. Results: Unilateral loading showed that connection area between implant fixture and bar generated maximum stress in bar type overdentures. Bar type produced 100 Mpa which means the most among 4 types of attachments. Bilateral loading, however, showed that bar type was more stable than other implants(magnet, ball and socket). 26 Mpa of bar type was about a half of other types on overdenture under $90^{\circ}$ bilateral loading. Conclusions: In any directions of stress, bar type was proved to be the most vulnerable type in both implants and overdentures. Interface stress did not show any significant difference in stress distribution pattern.

하악 완전 무치악 환자에서 이공 사이에 2개의 임플란트를 식립한 후 4종류의 어태치먼트를 사용한 하악 오버덴쳐를 제작하여 유한요소 모델을 만들고 여기에 3가지 하중 조건을 가하여 유한요소 해석 프로그램인 ANSYS 10.0을 이용하여 어태치먼트 종류에 따른 임플란트 주위골과 보철물 및 임플란트와 골 사이 계면에 발생하는 최대 응력의 크기와 응력 분포양상을 분석하였다. 하악골체의 전체적인 골격구조에서 치아 부분은 오버덴쳐로 모델을 형성하였고 오버덴쳐와 하악골 사이에 2mm 두께의 점막을 삽입하였다. 임플란트 오버덴쳐의 유한요소 모델은 ball and socket, Locator, magnet, bar의 각각 4가지 형태를 제작하였다. 고정체의 식립 위치는 양측 이공 전방이고, 경계 조건 중 고정점은 하악각 부위와 모형의 최후방 절점들을 고정점으로 설정하였다. 하중조건은 오버덴쳐의 좌측 제 2소구치에서 제 2대구치 편측 부위에 170N의 하중을, 좌 우측 제 2소구치에서 제 2대구치 양측 부위에 170N의 하중을, $90^{\circ}$수직 방향, $45^{\circ}$경사, 그리고 $0^{\circ}$ 수평 방향으로 가하였다. 결과 분석시 모든 하중방향에서 응력의 크기는 bar에서 임플란트나 오버덴쳐에서 가장 크게 나타났으며, 계면에서의 응력은 모든 어태치먼트에서 비슷한 응력분포가 나타났다. Ball and socket, Locator, magnet에서는 유의성을 보이지 않았다. 응력의 분포도에서는 4종류의 어태치먼트 모두 임플란트 치경부에서 응력이 집중된 양상을 보였으며 bar타입에서는 bar의 중앙에 응력이 크게나타났다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때 어태치먼트의 종류에 따라 응력분포의 차이가 있었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 어태치먼트의 선정 시 응력집중을 완화시킬 수 있는 바람직한 설계와 선택이 필요하리라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restoration supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillalofac Implants 1990;5:375-83
  2. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Beck DA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: PartⅠ-Retention, stability and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:354-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80331-2
  3. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr, Giglio JA. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part Ⅱ-Patient satisfaction and preference. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:364-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80332-4
  4. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302
  5. Naert I, Quirynen M, Theuniers G, Steenberghe D. Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:671-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90205-B
  6. Zarb GA. The edentulous milieu. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:825-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90358-X
  7. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  8. Park WH, Lee YS: Three dimensional finite element stress analysis of implant prosthesis according to the different fixture locations and angulations. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:61-77
  9. Hong HR, Choi DG, Bak J, Kwon KR. 3D finite element analysis of overdenture stability and stress distribution on mandibular implant-retained overdenture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45: 633-43
  10. Kenney R, Richards M. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:559-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70032-0
  11. Kang JM, Vang MS. Photoelastic stress analysis on the mandible caused by implant overdenture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1994;32:327-53
  12. Ichikawa T, Horiuchi M, Wigianto R, Matsumoto N. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:394-9
  13. Meijer H, Starmans F, Steen W, Bosman F. Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:47-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01123.x
  14. Meijer H, Starmans F, Steen W, Bosman F. Three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:271-9
  15. Giulio M, Massimo L, Paolo P, Giulio P. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:369-76
  16. Labaig C, Marco R, Fons A, Selva E. Biodynamics of attachments used in overdentures: experimental analysis with photoelasticity. Quintessence Int 1997;28:183-90
  17. Federick D, Caputo AA. Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:624- 32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90441-2
  18. Mericske-Stern R, Piotti M, Sirtes G. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:387-96 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070413.x
  19. Lavelle CL. Biomechanical considerations of prosthodontic therapy: The urgency of research into alveolar bone response. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:179-85
  20. Brochers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  21. Cook SD, Weintein AM, Klawitter JJ. A three dimensional finite element analysis of porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1982;61:25-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610010501
  22. Naert I, De Clercq M, Theuniers G, Schepers E. Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: A 2.5 year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:191-6
  23. Misch CE. Prosthetic options in implant dentistry. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed., Mosby 2008;92-104, 293-314
  24. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  25. Muhlemann, H.R., Sabdir L.S., Rakeitshak, K.H. Tooth mobility: Its cause and significance. J Periodontol 1965;36:148-56
  26. Van Steenberghe, D. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixture supporting fixed partial prosthesis in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:217-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8
  27. Parfitt, G.S.: Measurement of the physiologic mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960;39:68-73
  28. Pillar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Releat Res 1986;208:108-13
  29. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Bränemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:389-98
  30. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal force in normal and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1983;62:566-70 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051201
  31. Linderholm H, Wennstr$\ddot{o}$m A. Isometric bite force and its relation to general muscle force and body build. Acta Odontal Scand 1970;28:679-89 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357009058590
  32. Christensen J, Morimoto T. Dimension discremination at two different degrees of mouth opening and the effect of anesthesia applied to the periodontal ligaments. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4:157-64 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00979.x
  33. Haraldsson T, Karlsson U, Carlsson GE. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil 1979;6:41-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb00403.x
  34. Mericske-Stern R, Hofmann J, Wedig A, Geering AH. Maximal biting force and minimal pressure threshold measured on patients with overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: A comparative study, Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillalofac Implants 1993;8:641-9
  35. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM, Weijs WA, Naeije M. A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 1988;21:563-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9
  36. Mericske-Stern R, Geering AH, Buergin WB, Graf H. Three dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supportingoverdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:185-94
  37. Atilla S, Sungur G. Finite element analysis of the effects of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:165-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90301-7
  38. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  39. Robert G. Craig. Chap 4. Mechanical properties. Restorative dental materials. 8th ed., Missouri: CV Mosby; 1989.;82
  40. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Bränemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.implant interface. Clinical Materials 1992;10:153-201
  41. Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. part two: Axial loading. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:349-53
  42. Je HJ, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS, Hwang JS. Effect of anchorage systems and palatal coverage of denture base on load transfer with maxillary implant-supporting overdentures: A three dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:397-416
  43. Thayer H, Caputo A. Occlusal force transmission by overdenture attachments. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:266-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90005-2
  44. Evans FG. Mechanical properties of bone. Springfield: Charles C Thomas 1973;83-94:123-61
  45. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clinical Materials 1992;10:153-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y
  46. Hertel R, Kalk W. Influence of the dimensions of implant superstructure on peri-implant bone loss. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:18-24
  47. Rieger M, Mayberry M, Brose M. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90325-7
  48. Sadowsky SJ, Caputo AA. Effect of anchorage system and basecontact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:327-34 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109378
  49. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Bränemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.implant interface. Clinical Materials 1992;10:153-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y