Diameters of the Thoracic Aorta Measured with Multidetector Computed Tomography

다중검출 전산화 단층촬영을 이용하여 측정한 흉부대동맥의 직경

  • Lee, Gun (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Lim, Chang-Young (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Lee, Hyeon-Jae (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University)
  • 이건 (포천중문의과대학교 분당차병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 임창영 (포천중문의과대학교 분당차병원 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이헌재 (포천중문의과대학교 분당차병원 흉부외과학교실)
  • Received : 2008.10.21
  • Accepted : 2008.11.04
  • Published : 2009.02.05

Abstract

Background: Background: Computed tomography (CT) is the main tool for detecting abnormalities of the thoracic aorta, but conventional CT only shows the cross-sectional images. These CT images have some limitations fo accuratly measuring the thoracic aortic diameters at various levels. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) overcomes these limitations. We measured the thoracic aortic diameter perpendicular to the loop-shaped thoracic aortic course and this was studied in relation to age, gender, height, weight, the body surface area, the body mass index and the presence of hypertension. Material and Method: Thirty hundred thirty one patients (males: 141 patients and females: 190 patients) who had no abnormalities of the thoracic aorta were investigated using MDCT aortography. They were divided into three age categories: 20~39 years old, 40~59 years old and over age 60. The image was reformed with multiplanar reconstruction and the diameter of the aorta was measured perpendicular to the aortic course at 5 anatomic segments. Level A was the mid-ascending aorta, level B was the distal ascending aorta, level C was the aortic arch, level D was the aortic isthmus and level E was the mid-descending aorta. Result: The mean age was 49.5 years old for males and 54.9 years old for females (p<0.05). The mean diameter of the thoracic aorta at level A was 31.1 mm, that at level B was 30.2 mm, that at level C was 26.5 mm, that at level D was 24.0 mm and that at level E was 22.6 mm. The diameters at all the levels were gradually increased with age. Hypertensive patients had larger diameters than did the non-hypertensive population. There was a positive correlation between the ascending aortic diameter (levels A&B) and height and the body surface area, but there were no statistical differences at the aortic arch (level C) and the descending aorta (levels D&E). There were no statistical differences of the weight and body mass index at all levels. Conclusion: The diameters of the thoracic aortas were directly correlated with gender, age and hypertension. Height and the body surface area were only correlated with the ascending aorta. Weight and the body mass index have no statistical difference at all levels. We measured the age related thoracic aortic diameters and the upper normal limits and we provide this data as reference values for the thoracic aortic diameter in the Korean population.

배경: 전산화 단층촬영은 흉부대동맥의 이상소견을 진단하는데 매우 중요한 수단이다. 그러나 재래의 전산화 단층좔영은 단면적인 영상만을 볼 수 있어 여러 부위의 대동맥 직경을 측정하기에는 한계가 있었다. 다중검출 전산화 단층촬영은 이러한 한계를 극복할 수 있는 진단기기로 이를 이용하여 곡선으로 된 흉부대동맥의 직경을 주행방향과 직각으로 측정하여 연령, 성별, 키와 몸무게, 체표면적과 체질량지수, 고혈압과의 관계를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 다중검출 전산화 단층촬영 장비를 이용하여 대동맥 조영술을 시행한 환자 중 특별한 대동맥 질환이 없는 것으로 판독된 환자 331명을 대상으로 하였으며, 남자가 141명이고 여자가 190명이었다. 이들을 연령별로 20~39세, 40~59세, 60세 이상으로 분류하였다. 대동맥의 직경은 다면상으로 재구성한 단면에서 대동맥 주행방향과 직각이 되도록 측정하였으며 상행대동맥의 중간(level A), 원위부 상행대동맥(level B), 대동맥궁(level C), 대동맥 협부(level D), 하행대동맥의 중간(level E)의 다섯 군데에서 측정하였다. 결과: 대상환자의 평균연령은 남자가 49.5세이고 여자가 54.9세였다. 대동맥의 평균직경은 level A가 31.1 mm, level B가30.2 mm, level C가 26.5 mm, level D가 24.0 mm, level E가 22.6 mm였다. 대동맥의 직경은 나이에 비례해서 증가하는 양상을 보였으며 고혈압 환자가 정상인보다 대동맥의 직경이 크게 나타났다. 키와 체표면적에 따른 차이는 상행대동맥에서 유의하게 나타났고 대동맥궁과 하행대동맥은 유의한 차이가 없었다. 체중과 체질량지수는 모든 부위에서 통계적 유의성이 없었다. 결론: 흉부대동맥의 직경은 성별과 나이, 고혈압에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었고 키와 체표면적은 상행대동맥에만 차이를 보였고 하행대동맥에는 차이가 없었다. 그리고 체중과 체질량지수는 모든 부위에서 통계적 유의성이 없었다. 본 연구에서는 고혈압이 없는 정상인에서 연령별 대동맥 직경의 표준값과 정상한계값을 측정하였고 이를 한국인의 흉부대동맥 직경의 참고자료로 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysm: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:17-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03236-2
  2. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysm: a study of growth rates and complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1922-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00431-2
  3. Hager A, Kaemmerer H, Rapp-Bernhardt U, et al. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123:1060-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.122310
  4. Parker MV, O’Donnell SD, Chang AS, et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:199-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.12.010
  5. Broeders IA, Blackensteijin JD, Orlee M, Mail W, Eikeboom BC. Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: a prospective comparative study of spiral CT, angiography, and conventional CT imaging. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:252-61 https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0252:PSOGFT>2.0.CO;2
  6. Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GS, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging in acute aortic syndrome. Clin Radiol 2005;60:1256-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2005.06.011
  7. Mao SS, Ahmadi N, Shah B, et al. Normal thoracic aorta diameter on cardiac computed tomography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender. Acad Radiol 2008;15:827-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.001
  8. Hannuksela M, Lundqvist S, Carlberg B. Thoracic aorta - dilated or not? Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:175-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/14017430600565999
  9. Aronberg DJ, Glazer HS, Madsen K, Sagel SS. Normal aortic diameters by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:247-50
  10. Stefanadis C, Stratos C, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Pressure- diameter relation of the human aorta: a new method of determination by the application of a special ultrasonic dimension catheter. Circulation 1995;92:2210-9 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2210
  11. Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson LE, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: Normal limit by age, gender, and body surface area. JACC, Cardiovascular Imaging 2008;1:200-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.005
  12. Schlatmenn TJ, Becker AE. Histologic changes in the normal aging aorta: Implication for dissecting aortic aneurysm. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:13-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(77)80004-0
  13. Pearce WH, Slaughter MS, LeMaire S, et al. Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender and body surface area. Surgery 1993;114:691-7
  14. Park YH, Kim WH, Kim YW. Measurement of abdominal aortic diameter in Korean adults. J Korean Surg Soc 1994; 47:680-9