Browse > Article

Diameters of the Thoracic Aorta Measured with Multidetector Computed Tomography  

Lee, Gun (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University)
Lim, Chang-Young (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University)
Lee, Hyeon-Jae (Department of Thracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Bundang CHA General Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.42, no.1, 2009 , pp. 79-86 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Background: Computed tomography (CT) is the main tool for detecting abnormalities of the thoracic aorta, but conventional CT only shows the cross-sectional images. These CT images have some limitations fo accuratly measuring the thoracic aortic diameters at various levels. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) overcomes these limitations. We measured the thoracic aortic diameter perpendicular to the loop-shaped thoracic aortic course and this was studied in relation to age, gender, height, weight, the body surface area, the body mass index and the presence of hypertension. Material and Method: Thirty hundred thirty one patients (males: 141 patients and females: 190 patients) who had no abnormalities of the thoracic aorta were investigated using MDCT aortography. They were divided into three age categories: 20~39 years old, 40~59 years old and over age 60. The image was reformed with multiplanar reconstruction and the diameter of the aorta was measured perpendicular to the aortic course at 5 anatomic segments. Level A was the mid-ascending aorta, level B was the distal ascending aorta, level C was the aortic arch, level D was the aortic isthmus and level E was the mid-descending aorta. Result: The mean age was 49.5 years old for males and 54.9 years old for females (p<0.05). The mean diameter of the thoracic aorta at level A was 31.1 mm, that at level B was 30.2 mm, that at level C was 26.5 mm, that at level D was 24.0 mm and that at level E was 22.6 mm. The diameters at all the levels were gradually increased with age. Hypertensive patients had larger diameters than did the non-hypertensive population. There was a positive correlation between the ascending aortic diameter (levels A&B) and height and the body surface area, but there were no statistical differences at the aortic arch (level C) and the descending aorta (levels D&E). There were no statistical differences of the weight and body mass index at all levels. Conclusion: The diameters of the thoracic aortas were directly correlated with gender, age and hypertension. Height and the body surface area were only correlated with the ascending aorta. Weight and the body mass index have no statistical difference at all levels. We measured the age related thoracic aortic diameters and the upper normal limits and we provide this data as reference values for the thoracic aortic diameter in the Korean population.
Keywords
Aorta; Computed tomography; Angiography; Diameter;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson LE, et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: Normal limit by age, gender, and body surface area. JACC, Cardiovascular Imaging 2008;1:200-9   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Pearce WH, Slaughter MS, LeMaire S, et al. Aortic diameter as a function of age, gender and body surface area. Surgery 1993;114:691-7
3 Park YH, Kim WH, Kim YW. Measurement of abdominal aortic diameter in Korean adults. J Korean Surg Soc 1994; 47:680-9
4 Hager A, Kaemmerer H, Rapp-Bernhardt U, et al. Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123:1060-6   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Parker MV, O’Donnell SD, Chang AS, et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:199-205   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GS, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging in acute aortic syndrome. Clin Radiol 2005;60:1256-67   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Schlatmenn TJ, Becker AE. Histologic changes in the normal aging aorta: Implication for dissecting aortic aneurysm. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:13-20   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Mao SS, Ahmadi N, Shah B, et al. Normal thoracic aorta diameter on cardiac computed tomography in healthy asymptomatic adults: impact of age and gender. Acad Radiol 2008;15:827-34   DOI
9 Hannuksela M, Lundqvist S, Carlberg B. Thoracic aorta - dilated or not? Scand Cardiovasc J 2006;40:175-8   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysm: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:17-27   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Aronberg DJ, Glazer HS, Madsen K, Sagel SS. Normal aortic diameters by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:247-50
12 Stefanadis C, Stratos C, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Pressure- diameter relation of the human aorta: a new method of determination by the application of a special ultrasonic dimension catheter. Circulation 1995;92:2210-9   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysm: a study of growth rates and complications. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1922-6   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Broeders IA, Blackensteijin JD, Orlee M, Mail W, Eikeboom BC. Preoperative sizing of grafts for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management: a prospective comparative study of spiral CT, angiography, and conventional CT imaging. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:252-61   DOI   ScienceOn