A study on the proof of additive law of sine function using technology - A case study focused on mathematics education for the gifted -

테크놀로지를 활용한 사인함수의 덧셈정리 증명 - 수학영재아를 중심으로 한 사례연구 -

  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the influence of technology, which gave an impact on students through the process of teaching & learning for the proof of an additive law of sine function in the mathematics education for the gifted. We chose students who were taking a course in enrichment mathematics at Science Education Institute for the Gifted in Mokpo National University, and analyzed their processes of a mathematical inference or conjecture, an algebraic description and a proof by visualization using technology. We found the following facts. That is, the visualization using technology is helpful to the gifted students in understanding principles and concepts of mathematics by intuition. Also, it is helpful to ones verifying various cases and generalizing principles. But, using technology can be a factor that disturbs learning of students who are clumsy with operating technology.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획 ('08-'12).
  2. 류희찬. 조완영 (1999). 증명의 필요성 이해와 탐구형 기하 소프트웨어의 활용, 대한수학교육학회논문집 9(2), 서울: 대한수학교육학회.
  3. 박성익 외 (2003). 영재교육학원론, 서울: 교육과학사.
  4. 신동선. 류희찬 (1999). 수학교육과 컴퓨터, 서울: 경문사.
  5. 신유경. 강윤수. 정인철 (2008), GSP가 증명학습에 미치는 영향 : 사례연구, 한국학교수학회논문집 11(1), 공주: 한국학교수학회.
  6. 우정호 (2000). 수학학습-지도 원리와 방법, 서울: 서울대학교 출판부.
  7. 이종영 (1999). 컴퓨터 환경에서의 기하 지도의 문제점과 교수학적 처방의 예, 대한수학교육학회지 <학교수학> 1(1), 서울: 대한수학교육학회.
  8. 전영국. 주미 (1998). 기하문제해결에서의 GSP를 활용한 탐구학습 신장, 대한수학교육학회논문집 8(2), 서울: 대한수학교육학회.
  9. 정인철. 김택수. 황운구 (2007). 테크놀러지 활용수업에서 경험적 인식과 수학적 사고에 관한 연구-중학교 3학년 기하 단원을 중심으로, 한국학교수학회논문집 10(2), 공주: 한국학교수학회.
  10. 정인철. 오세열 (2001). 수학교육에서의 테크날러지, 한국학교수학회논문집 4(1), 공주: 한국학교수학회.
  11. 한동숭. 조지연 (2003). GSP를 활용한 기하교육 연구사례, 한국학교수학회논문집 6(1), 공주: 한국학교수학회.
  12. 한인기 (2005). 사인의 덧셈정리에 대한 다양한 증명방법 연구, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집> 19(3), 서울: 한국수학교육학회.
  13. 한혜숙. 신현성 (2008). 증명학습에 대한 학생들의 성향과 GSP를 활용한 증명학습, 한국학교수학회논문집 11(2), 공주: 한국학교수학회.
  14. Chazan, D. (1993), High school geometry students' justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof, Educational Studies in Mathematics 2A, pp.359-387.
  15. Johnson, D. L (1997), Intergrating technology in the classroom: The time has come, Computers in the Schools 13(1), pp.1-5. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v13n01_01
  16. Marrades, R. & Gutie'rrez, A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment, Educational Studies in Mathematics 44, pp.87- 125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012785106627
  17. NCTM (1989). The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
  18. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author.
  19. Nelson, R. B, (1993). Proofs without Words I: More exercises in visual thinking, Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
  20. Nelson, R. B. (2000). Proofs without Words II: More exercises in visual thinking, Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
  21. Patton, M Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  22. Renzulii, J. S. & Reis, S. M (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence(2nd ed), Creative Learning Press.
  23. Scher, D. (1996). Folded paper, dynamic geometry and proof: A three-tier approach to the conics, The Mathematics Teacher 89(3), pp.188-193.
  24. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Mathematics, Technology and higher order thinking, In Nickerson, R. S. & Zodhiates, P. P.(ed), Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
  25. Zheng, T. (1998). Impacts of using calculator in learning mathematics, The 3rd Asian Technology Coference on Mathematics (ATCM'98). Accessed (18, Jun, 2009) at Electronic proceedings of ATCM '98 on the World Wide Web: http://www. atcminc.com/mPublications/EP/EPATCM98/index.html.