Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CURING MODES ON COMPOSITE RESIN/DENTIN BOND STRENGTH IN CLASS ICAVITIES

1급 와동에서 상아질과 복합레진의 결합강도에 대한 중합방법의 효과

  • Baek, Shin-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Song, Byeong-Choon (Department of Conservative Dentistry College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 백신영 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 송병춘 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength in Class I cavities associated with different light curing modes of same light energy density. Occlusal enamel was removed to expose a flat dentin surface and twenty box-shaped Class I cavities were prepared in dentin. Single Bond (3M Dental product) was applied and Z 250 was inserted using bulk technique. The composite was light-cured using one of four techniques, pulse delay (PD group), soft-start (SS group), pulse cure (PC group) and standard continuous cure (CC group). The light-curing unit capable of adjusting time and intensity (VIP, Bisco Dental product) was selected and the light energy density for all curing modes was fixed at $16J/cm^2$. After storage for 24 hours, specimens were sectioned into beams with a rectangular cross-sectional area of approximately $1mm^2$ Microtensile bond strength $({\mu}TBS)$ test was per- formed using a univel·sal testing machine (EZ Test, Shimadzu Co.). The results were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Tukey's test at significance level 0.05. The ${\mu}TBS$ of PD group and SS group was higher than that of PC group and CC group. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, modification of curing modes such as pulse delay and soft start polymerization can improve resin/dentin bond strength in Class I cavities by controlling polymerization velocity of composite resin.

본 연구는 1급 복합레진 수복물에서 할로겐 광조사기를 이용한 4가지 중합방법이 상아질의 결합강도에 미치는 효과를 알아보기 위하여 시행하였다. 발거된 상 하악 대구치 20개의 교합면측 법랑질을 Diamond Wheel Saw를 이용하여 제거한 후 1급 와동을 형성하였다. 중합방법에 따라 파동지연 중합방법 (PD) 군, 연성 중합방법 (SS) 군, 파동 중합방법 (PC) 군, 지속 중합방법 (CC) 군의 4개 군으로 분류하고, Z250 복합레진을 각 군의 와동에 충전한 후 광조사하였다. 각 군의 시편을 주수하에 접착계면의 단면적이 $1mm^2$가 되도록 절단하여 막대모양의 시편을 제작하였고, 각 군당 20개의 시편을 사용하여 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. PD 군은 PC 군과 CC 군보다 통계학적으로 더 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 나타내었다. 2. SS군의 미세인장 결합강도는 PC 군과 CC 군보다 높게 나타났으나, 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 결론적으로, 1급 복합레진 수복물을 중합할 때 파동지연 중합방법과 연성 중합방법을 사용하여 중합속도를 조절함으로써 상아질과 복합레진의 결합강도를 개선할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lu H, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Towards the elucidation of shrinkage stress development and relaxation in dental composites. Dent Mater 20 :979-986, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.002
  2. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite- dentine bond strength and the polymerization contraction. J Dent Res 63:1396-1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  3. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 21: 203-208, 1996
  4. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb, RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 25:448-453, 2000
  5. Uno S, Shimokobe H. Contraction stress and marginal adaptation of composite restorations in dentinal cavity. Dent Mater 13:19-24. 1997
  6. Labella L, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15:128- 137, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
  7. Pfeifer CSC, Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Pulse-delay curing: influence of initial irradiance and delay time on shrinkage stress and microhardness of restorative composites. Oper Dent 31:610-615, 2006 https://doi.org/10.2341/05-118
  8. Hofmann N, Dnner W, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The influence of plasma arc vs halogen standard or soft-start irradiation on polymerization shrinkage kinetics of polymer matrix composites. J Dent 31:383-393, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00089-7
  9. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and inegrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 103:322-326, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00033.x
  10. Cristiane MA, Alessandra RP, Glaucia MBA, Edward JS, Luiz AFP. The effect of light-curing source and mode on microtensile bond strength to bovine dentin. J Adhes Dent 8:41-45, 2006
  11. Yap AU, Ng SC, Siow KS. Soft start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent 26:260-266, 2001
  12. Halvorson RH, Erickson RL & Davidson CL. Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. Dent Mater 18:463-469, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00069-0
  13. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of Class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater 17:316-321, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00089-0
  14. Uno S, Amussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. J Dent Res 79:309-319, 2000
  15. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal gap formation of light activated restorative bond strength. Dent Mater 18:203-210, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00083-5
  16. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 2000
  17. Chye CH, Yap AUJ, Laim YC, Soh MS. Post-gel polymerization shrinkage associated with different light curing regimens. Oper Dent 30(4):474-480, 2005
  18. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho Rm, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 78:699- 705, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780021001
  19. Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL. Effect of cross sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 13:290-296, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X
  20. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. Quintessence Int 97-114, 1997
  21. Kanca J 3, Suh BI. Pulse-activation: Reducing resin based-composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 12:107-112, 1999
  22. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation. Dent Mater 18:436-444, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00066-5
  23. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Dent Res 12(1):23-32, 2004
  24. Santos AJS, Sarmento CF, Abuabara A, Auiar FHB, Lovadino JR. Step-cure polymerization: effect of initial light intensity on resin/dentin bond strength in Class I cavities. Oper Dent 31:324-331, 2006 https://doi.org/10.2341/05-37
  25. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Covey DA. Effect of plasma arc curing on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 13(3):121-122, 2000
  26. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composite with and without 'soft start-polymerization' J Dent 25:321- 330, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00044-9
  27. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F, Schuster GS. Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials 12:737-740, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90022-3