The Journal of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구)

Korea Association of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detecting Emerging Technology using Information Analysis

정보분석 방법론을 활용한 유망기술 탐색

  • 이우형 (정보통신연구진흥원 전략기획단 중장기전략팀) ;
  • 김한주 (정보통신연구진흥원 전략기획단 중장기전략팀) ;
  • 박준철 (강릉대학교 공과대학 산업시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting emerging trends and transient in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive Information analysis. A specialty is conceptualized as a time variant duality research front concepts in information science. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The contributions of the approach is that the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms. The modeling process is implemented in RADERS, and applied to the analysis of telecommunication field. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.

Keywords

References

  1. 박용재, 정경수, "e-비즈니스 발전단계에 따른 경쟁전략과 e-비즈니스 성과와의 관련성 분석," 제16권, 제2호, 2007, pp. 1-33.
  2. 박준철, "e-Marketplace 이용기업의 신뢰가 몰입, 장기거래지향성, 협력에 미치는 영향," 정보시스템연구, 제16권, 제2호, 2007, pp. 123-144.
  3. Andrews, K., "Visualizing Cyberspace: Information Visualization in the Harmony Internet Browser, Proceedings of InfoVis'95", IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, New York, 1995, pp. 97-104.
  4. Card, S. K. and Mackinlay, J. D., "The Structure of the Information Visualization Design Space", Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 1997 (InfoVis'97), Phoenix, AZ, 1997, pp. 92-99.
  5. Chen, C., Mapping Scientific Frontiers : The Quest for Knowledge Visualization, Springer, 2003.
  6. Kontostathis, A., Pottenger, L.M., Roy, S., and Phelps, D.J., A Survey of Emerging Trend Detection in Textual Data Mining, NewYork: Springer_Verlag, 2003.
  7. Kostoff, R. N.,, The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment, Office of Naval Research, 1997.
  8. Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  9. Lamping, J., Rao, R., and Pirolli, P., "A Focus + Context Technique Based on Hyperbolic Geometry for Visualizing Large Hierarchies", Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Denver, CO, 1995, pp. 401-408.
  10. Law, J. and Whittaker, J., "Mapping Acidification Research: A Test of the co-word Method", Scientometrics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1992, pp. 417-461 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029807
  11. Leydesdorff, L. and Meyer, M., "Triple Helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems (Introduction to the Special Issue)", Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016
  12. Leydesdorff, L., "Betweenness Centrality" as an Indicator of the "Interdisciplinarity" of Scientific Journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 9, 2007, pp. 1303-1309 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614
  13. Moed, H.F., "Bibliometric Measurement of Research Performance and Price's Theory of Differences among the Sciences", Scientometrics, Vol. 15, No. 5-6, 1989, pp. 473-485 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017066
  14. Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G., Van Raan, A.F.J., "The Use of Bibliometric Data for the Measurement of University Research Performance", Research Policy, Vol. 14, 1985, pp. 131-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
  15. Moed, H. F., Wolfgang, G., and Schmoch, U.,, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005.
  16. Newman, M. E. J., "Coauthorships Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration", PNAS, Vol. 101, 2004, pp. 5200-5205 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
  17. Porter, A., "Text Mining for Technology Foresight", Technology Opportunities Analysis Project paper at Georgia Tech, 2000.
  18. Price, D. D., Little Science, Big Science. Unpublished Manuscript, 1963.
  19. Pritchard, A., "Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 24, 1969, pp. 348-349.
  20. Robertson, G.G., Mackinlay, J.D. and Card, S.K., "Cone Trees: Animated 3D Visualizations of Hierarchical Information", Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI'91, 1991, pp. 189-194.
  21. Small, H., "A co-citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: a Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 7, 1977, pp. 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700202
  22. Tijssen, R.J.W., "A Quantitative Assessment of Interdisciplinary Structures in Science and Technology : co-classification Analysis of Energy Research", Research Policy, Vol. 21, 1992, pp. 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90025-Y
  23. Van Raan, A.F.J., "Advanced Bibliometric Methods as Quantitative Core of Peer Review Based Evaluation and Foresight Exercises", Scientometrics, Vol. 36, 1996, pp. 397-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129602
  24. Van Raan, A.F.J., "Scientometrics : State-of-art", Scientometrics, Vol. 38, 1997, pp. 205-218 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461131
  25. Voutilainen, A., "A Short Introduction to NPtool", Available at: http://www.lingsoft.fi/doc/nttool/intro/, 1997.

Cited by

  1. The Analysis of Knowledge Structure using Co-word Method in Quality Management Field vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.2.389
  2. Detecting Emerging Technology to Use Social Network Analysis : Focusing on Mobile Telecommunication vol.21, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2012.21.4.109