DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주화성에 의한 활동성 정자 분리용 마이크로 바이오칩에 관한 연구

A Study About Microbiochip for Separation of Motile Sperm by Using Chemotaxis

  • 고용준 (한양대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 맹준호 (한양대학교 대학원 생화학과) ;
  • 안유민 (한양대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 황승용 (한양대학교 분자생명과학부, ㈜지노첵)
  • 발행 : 2008.12.01

초록

This paper presents a new microchip which can separate motile sperm by chemotaxis. The microchip was developed to create longitudinal concentration gradient in the microchannel due to diffusion. Linearly good concentration gradient of chemoattractant was generated without any fluid control devices. In sperm separation experiment with the developed microchip, mouse sperm was used as sample and acetylcholine was selected as chemoattractant. Human tubal fluid (HTF), buffer solution, was introduced into the microchannel of the microchip and attractants diluted in ratio of 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 and 1/64 including control (DI water) were dropped in each outlet by $2\;{\mu}l$ volume with micropippet. After 5min, $1\;{\mu}l$ sperm solution was dropped into inlet of the chip. After 10 min, when sperms reached to the outlet by chemotaxis, we counted sperms in each outlet by using microscopy. Consequently, we could separate progressive motile sperm with the new microchip. In the experiment, the most sperms were isolated at the outlet dropped with 1/16 diluted solution. The optimal concentration gradient to induce chemotaxis was about 0.625 mg/ml/mm.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eisenbach, M. and Giojalas L. C., 2006, “Sperm Guidance in Mammals- an Unpaved Road to the Egg,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol., Vol. 7, pp. 276-285 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1893
  2. Bahat, A. and Eisenbach, M., 2006, “Sperm Thermotaxis,” Mol. Cell. Endorcrinol., Vol. 252, pp. 115-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2006.03.027
  3. Bahat, A., Eisenbach, M. and Tur-Kaspa, I., 2005, “Periovulatory Increase in Temperature Difference Within the Rabbit Oviduct,” Hum. Reprod., Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 2118-2121 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei006
  4. Bahat, A., Tur-Kaspa, I., Gakamsky, A., Breitbart, H. and Eisenbach, M., 2003, “Thermotaxis of Mammalian Sperm Cells: A Potential Navigation Mechanism in the Female Genital Tract,” Nat. Med., Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 149-150 https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0203-149
  5. Eisenbach, M., 1999, “Sperm Chemotaxis,” Rev. Reprod., Vol. 4, pp. 56-66 https://doi.org/10.1530/ror.0.0040056
  6. Ei-Toukhy, T. and Braude, P., 2002, “Male Infertility and ICSI,” Curr. Obstet. Gynaecol., Vol. 12, pp. 276-285 https://doi.org/10.1054/cuog.2002.0275
  7. Henkel, R. R. and Schill, W. B., 2003, “Sperm Preparation for ART,” Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. Vol. 2:12,:http://www.rbej.com/content/2/1/12
  8. Horsman, K. M., Barker, S. L. R., Ferrance, J. P., Forrest, K. A., Koen, K. A. and Landers, J. P., 2005, “Separation of Sperm and Epithelial Cells in a Microfabricated Device: Potential Application to Forensic Analysis of Sexual Assault Evidence,” Anal. Chem., Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 742-749 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0486239
  9. Kricka, L. J., Faro, I., Heyner, S., Garside, W. T., Fitzpatrick, G., McKinnon, G., Ho, J. and Wilding, P., 1997, “Micromachined Analytical Devices: Microchip for Semen Testing,” J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., Vol. 15, pp. 1443-1447 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02046-8
  10. Cho, B. S., Schuster, T. G. , Zhu, X., Chang, D., Smith, G. D. and Takayama, S., 2003, “Passively Driven Integrated Microfludic System for Separation of Motile Sperm,” Anal. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 7, pp. 1671-1675 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020579e
  11. Clark, S. G., Haubert, K., Beebe, D. J., Ferguson, C. E. and Wheeler, M. B., 2005, “Reduction of Polyspermic Penetration Using Biomimetic Microfluidic Technology During in Vitro Fertilization,” Lab Chip, Vol. 5, pp. 1229-1232 https://doi.org/10.1039/b504397m
  12. Koyama, S., Amarie, D., Soini, H. A., Novotny, M. V. and Jacobson, S. C., 2006, “Chemotaxis Assay of Mouse Sperm on Microfluidic Devices,” Anal. Chem., Vol. 78, No. 10, pp. 3354-3359 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac052087i
  13. Brody, J. P., Yager, P., Goldstein, R. E. and Austin, R. H., 1996, “Biotechnology at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Biophys. J., pp. 3430-3441