대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제35권3호
  • /
  • Pages.399-417
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지

교합력, 교근과 두개안면골 형태의 관계 : 두부규격방사선사진과 초음파진단영상 분석

A STUDY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BITE FORCE, MASSETER MUSCLE AND CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY : CEPHALOMETRIC & ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

  • 이미숙 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최영철 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 최성철 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 김광철 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강생물학연구소)
  • Lee, Mi-Sook (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Yeong-Chul (Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Chul (Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Gwang-Chul (Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2008.08.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

교합력과 교근의 두께 및 면적 그리고 두개안면골 형태간의 연관성을 평가하고자 하였다. 성인 141명의 교합력 측정, 측방 및 후전방 두부규격방사선사진 그리고 교근 표층의 초음파진단영상을 촬영한 후, 이들 간의 관계를 통계분석으로 비교, 평가하였다. 교합력과 두개안면골의 형태간에는 남녀 모두 유의한 상관관계가 있으며, 교합력과 교근 간에는 남녀 모두 유의한 상관관계가 없었다. 그러나 교근은 남자의 두개안면골 형태에서 유의한 상관관계를 보였고, 특히 교근의 두께 및 면적이 증가할수록 상악너비가 유의하게 감소하게 나타났다. 이는 남자의 교합력은 심층 교근과 관계가 크고, 여자의 교합력은 표층 교근과 관계가 큰 것이 원인으로 판단된다.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between bite force, masseter muscle and craniofacial morphology. 141 individuals were included. Bite forces were measured with a bite force transducer(SKT 2004). The facial morphology of the samples was evaluated on the Lateral and PA cephalometric radiographs(Asahi CX-90 SP). Ultrasonographic images were obtained for 36 individuals(Logiq 500). General status of the subjects were also measured for investigating possible relationships. Their relationships were analyzed by means of t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficients and simple regression analysis. In conclusion, bite force of molar was significantly correlated with craniofacial morphology for males and females, but not to masseter muscles. The masseter muscle for males had a significant correlation with craniofacial morphology. The unexpected negative correlations between size of masseter muscle and maxillary width was revealed for males. One possible way to arrive at a plausible explanation for the correlation between masster muscle, bite force and craniofacial morphology of males were the deep layer of masseter muscle had a great influence on males and the superficial layer of masseter muscle had a great influence on females.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, et al. : The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odont Scand, 51:323-331, 1993. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040583
  2. Ingervall B, Minder C : Correlation between maximum bite force and facial morphology in children. Angle Orthod, 67(6):415-424, 1997.
  3. 박수배, 최영철 : 6-14세 소아청소년의 교합력과 두개안면골의 해부학적 형태에 관한 횡단누년적 연구. 경희대학교치과대학 박사학위 논문, 2008.
  4. Ringqvist M : Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of facial skeleton. Acta Odont Scand, 31:35-42, 1973. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357309004611
  5. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, et al. : Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res, 100:164-171, 1992.
  6. Kiliaridis S, Kalebo P : Masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and its relation to facial morphology. J Dent Res, 70(9):1262-1265, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700090601
  7. Hannam AG, Wood WW : Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscle, the craniofacial skeleton and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol, 80(4):429-445, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330800404
  8. Berkovitz BKB, Holland GR, Moxham BJ : A Colour Atals and Textbook of Oral Anatomy; Histology and Embryology. 2nd ed. Wlofe Publishing Ltd., 72-73, 1992.
  9. Du Brul EL : Sicher's Oral Anatomy. 7th ed. CV Mosby Company. St Louis., 142-173, 1980.
  10. Gaudy JF, Zouaoui A, Bravetti P, et al. : Functional organization of the human masseter muscle. Surg Radio Ana, 22(3-4):181-190, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-000-0181-5
  11. Higashino R : Relationship between jaws and the masseter muscle by superimposing MR images on the cephalogram. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi., 73(1): 116-124, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5357/koubyou.73.116
  12. Ruf S, Pancherz H, Kirschbaum M : Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle. Fortschr Kieferorthop, 55:219-227, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173753
  13. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, et al. : Comparison of jaw-muscle bite-force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution CT scanning. J Dent Res, 68(12):1765-1770, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120901
  14. Gedrange T, Harzer W : Muscle influence on postnatal craniofacial development and diagnostics. J Orofac Orthop, 65(6):451-166, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-004-0405-0
  15. Kiliaridis S : Masticatory muscle influence on craniofacial growth. Acta Odont Scand, 53(3):196-202, 1995. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005972
  16. Gionhaku N, Lowe AA. : Relationship between jaw muscle volume and craniofacial form. J Dent Res, 68(5):805-809, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051001
  17. Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, et al. : Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude. J Dent Res, 78(1):31-42, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780010301
  18. Kovero O, Hurmerinta K, Zepa I, et al. : Maximal bite force and its associations with spinal posture and craniofacial morphology in young adults. Acta Odont Scand, 60:365-369, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163502762667405
  19. Tuxen A, Bakke M, Pinholt EM : Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibers, function and facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol, 44:509-518, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00008-4
  20. van den Braber W, van der Bilt A, van der Glas H, et al. : The influence of mandibular advancement surgery on oral function in retrognathic patients: a 5-year follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 64:1237-1240, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.019
  21. Ohkura K, Harada K, Morishima S, et al. : Changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after orthognathic surgery for correction of mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 91(2): 141-145, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.112334
  22. Harada K, Watanabe M, Okura K, et al. : Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58:370-373, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90913-3
  23. Throckmorton GS, Ellis E 3rd., Sinn DP : Functional characteristics of retrognathic patients before and after mandibular advancement surgery. J Oral Masillofac Surg, 53(8):898-909, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90277-5
  24. Ellis E 3rd., Throckmorton GS, Sinn DP : Bite forces before and after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 54:176-181, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90443-7
  25. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA : An atlas of craniofacial grwoth. The center for human Growth and Development. The University of Michigan 41, 1974.
  26. Enlow DH, McNamara Jr. JA : The neurocranial basis for facial form and pattern. Angle Orthod, 43(3):256-270, 1973.
  27. Enlow DH : Handbook of Facial Growth. 2nd ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia., 222-228, 1982.
  28. Enlow DH, Hans MG : Essential of facial growth. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia., 122-145, 1996.
  29. 이정옥, 최영철 : Angle 1급 부정교합 아동의 안면두개골 형태의 유형적 특징에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 26(1):172-184, 1999.
  30. 이미숙, 최영철 : I급과 III급 부정교합을 보이는 어린이의 두개저의 성장변화에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 28(1):95-105, 2001.
  31. 임은경, 최영철 : 운동이 안면두개골의 형태에 미치는 영향. 대한소아치과학회지, 30(4):563-575, 2003.
  32. Corruccini RS, Whitley LD, Kaul SS, et al. : Facial height and breadth relative to dietary consistency and oral breathing in two populations (North India and U.S.) Human Biology, 57(2):151-161, 1985.
  33. Raadsheer MC, Van Eijden TM, Van Spronsen PH, et al. : A comparison of human masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol, 39(12):1079-1984, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90061-2
  34. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, et al. : Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and normal craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod, 13:351-361, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.5.351
  35. Ueda HM, Ishizuka Y, Miyamoto K, et al. : Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod, 68(3):233-238, 1988.
  36. Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, et al. : Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Archs Oral Biol, 41(4): 323- 332, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00136-0
  37. Benington PCM, Gardener JE, Hunt NP : Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod, 21:659-670, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.6.659
  38. Manns A, Miralles R, Palazzi C : EMG, bite force, and elongation of the masseter muscle under isometric voluntary contraction and variations of vertical dimension. J Prosth Dent, 42(6):674-682, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90200-2
  39. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW : Effect of jaw opening on the direction and magnitude of human incisal bite forces. J Dent Res, 76(1):561-567, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760010601
  40. Braun S, Bantleon H-P, Hnat WP, et al. : A study of bite force, part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod, 65(5):367-372, 1995.
  41. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW : Effects on human maximum bite force of biting on a softer or harder object. Arch Oral Bio, 43(11):833-839, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(98)00073-9
  42. Ahlberg JP, Kovero OA, Hurmerinta KA, et al. : Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of TMD, occlusion, and body mass index in a cohort of young adults. J Cranio Pract, 21(4):248-252, 2003.
  43. Kiliaridis S, Johansson A, Haraldson T, et al. : Craniofacial morphology, occlusal traits, and bite force in persons with advanced occlusal tooth wear. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 107:286-292, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70144-3
  44. Sondang P, Kumagai H, Tanaka E, et al. : Correlation between maximum bite force and craniofacial morphology of young adults in Indonesia. J Oral Rehabil, 30:1109-1117, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01163.x
  45. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, et al. : Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res, 98:149-158, 1990.