불소방출성 콤포짓트 레진계 수복재의 특성

PROPERTIES OF FLUORIDE-RELEASING RESIN COMPOSITE RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

  • 김상훈 (전북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 백병주 (전북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김재곤 (전북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 양연미 (전북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 박정렬 (전북대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Kim, Sang-Hoon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Baik, Byeong-Ju (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Gon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yang, Yeon-Mi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Yeol (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.08.29

초록

본 연구에서는 구강 환경과 유사한 조건에서 불소방출성을 보이는 콤포짓트 레진계 수복재의 내구성과 불소방출성을 조사하기 위해 4 종의 콤포머와 1 종의 불소방출성 콤포짓트 레진을 실험재료로 선택하고 $5^{\circ}C$$55^{\circ}C$ 수중에서의 열순환 처리 후의 인장강도, 열순환 처리 후 칫솔에 대한 작용력 1.5N으로 100,000회 칫솔질을 시행하였을 때의 표면조도 및 불소치약 칫솔질 후 $37^{\circ}C$ 수중에서의 불소이온 용출 양상을 조사한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 인장강도는 TC($Tetric^{(R)}$ Ceram)군에서 32.3 MPa, CF(Compoglass F)군에서 16.8 MPa이고, TC군과 DF($Dyract^{(R)}$ flow)군 및 CF군에서 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<0.05). 2. 칫솔질 마모시험 후의 표면조도 Ra는 TC군에서 0.287, FT(F2000)군에서 1.516이고, FT군과 나머지 시험군 사이에 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<0.05). 3. 칫솔질 마모시험 후의 표면에서는 필러의 돌출과 탈락 양상이 관찰되었다. 4. 불소치약 Perio Alpine Herb로 칫솔질 한 후 콤포머는 초기에 높은 용출을 보인 후 시간이 경과하면서 용출량이 감소하는 양상을 보였지만, 불소방출성 콤포짓트 레진의 TC군에서는 초기단계부터 낮으면서도 지속적인 용출을 보였다. 5. 불소치약 Perio Alpine Herb로 칫솔질 한 후 1시간이 경과하였을 때의 불소이온 용출량은 CF군에서 $2.064{\mu}g/cm^2$, TC 군에서 $0.1119{\mu}g/cm^2$이고, CF군의 용출량이 나머지 시험군에 비해 유의하게 높은 값을 보였다(P<0.05).

The objectives of this study were to examine the properties of fluoride-releasing resin composite restorative materials. Four commercially available compomer materials (Compoglass F: CF, $Dyract^{(R)}$ AP: DA, $Dyract^{(R)}$ flow: DF, F2000: FT) and one fluoride-releasing composite resin ($Tetric^{(R)}$ Ceram: TC) were selected as experimental materials. Rectangular-shaped tensile test specimens were fabricated in a teflon mold giving 5mm in gauge length and 2mm in thickness. Disk-shaped specimens were fabricated in the split teflon mold with diameter of 15mm and thickness of 1mm. After curing for an hour, specimens were immersed in deionized water at $37^{\circ}C{\pm}1^{\circ}C$ for 30 days. All specimens were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles with 15 seconds of dwelling time in each $5^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$ water baths. Toothbrush abrasion test was conducted under a load of 1.5 N and the abraded surfaces were examined with surface roughness tester (SV-3000, Mitutoyo Co, Japan) and SEM (JSM-5800, JEOL, Japan). Fluoride recharging was done by toothbrushing for 3 min. using a fluoride toothpaste (Perio Alpine Herb, LG Household & Health Care, Korea). The results obtained were summarized as follows; 1. The highest tensile strength value of 32.3 MPa was observed in TC group and the lowest value of 16.8 MPa was observed in CF group. The tensile strength of TC group was significantly higher than those of CF and DF groups (P<0.05). 2. The lowest Ra value of 0.287 was observed in TC group and the highest value of 1.516 was observed in FT group. The Ra value of FT group was significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05). 3. The abraded surfaces revealed the increase of surface roughness due to the protrusion and missing of filler particles. 4. The release of fluoride of compomers after tooth brushing by Perio Alpine Herb was initially large and then followed by small and continuously. But it remains small and constant in fluoride-releasing composite resin of TC. 5. The highest value of fluoride release after toothbrushing by Perio Alpine Herb was $2.064{\mu}g/cm^2$ in CF group and the lowest value was $0.1119{\mu}g/cm^2$ in TC group. The amount of fluoride release of CF group was significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wilson AD : Developments in glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont, 2:438-446, 1989.
  2. Bourke AM, Walls AW, McCabe JF : Light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements : the setting reaction. J Dent, 20:115-120, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90118-V
  3. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD : Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials(guest editorial). Quintessence Int, 25:587-589, 1994.
  4. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E : Properties of resin-modified glass- ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int, 27:203-209, 1996.
  5. Xu X, Burgess JO : Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials, 24:2451-2461, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00638-5
  6. Mathis RS, Ferracane JL : Properties of a glassionomer/ resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater, 5:355-358, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90130-9
  7. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF : Fluoride Release from glass- ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent, 26:355-359, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00016-X
  8. Soderholm KJ : Degradation of glass filler in experimental composites. J Dent Res, 60:1867-1875, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600110701
  9. Indrani DJ, Cook WD, Televantos F, et al. : Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater, 11:201-207, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-0
  10. 이봉규, 이난영, 이상호 : C-factor와 충전법이 복합레진의 중합 수축에 의한 치질에서의 수축 응력에 미치는 영향. 대한소아치과학회지, 33:233-243, 2006.
  11. 박용우, 김종수, 유승훈 : 유동성 레진 수복물에서 접착제 중합 여부에 따른 미세누출과 전단결합강도에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 34:233-243, 2007.
  12. Truong VT, Tyas MJ : Prediction of in vivo wear in posterior composite resins : a fracture mechanics approach. Dent Mater, 4:318-327, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80044-7
  13. Mair LH, Vowels R : The effect of thermal cycling on the fracture toughness of seven composite restorative materials. Dent Mater, 5:23-26, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90087-0
  14. Pearson GJ, Atkinson AS : Long-term flexural strength of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials, 12:658-660, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90113-O
  15. Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, et al. : Flexural properties of resin-modified "hybrid" glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glassionomers. Dent Mater J, 14:109-119, 1995. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.14.109
  16. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U : Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater, 12:64-69, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80066-2
  17. Tosaki S, Hirota K : Current and future trends for light cured systems, Glass-Ionomers. The next generation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers. Hunt PR Editor, 35-46, 1994.
  18. Li J, von Beetzen M, Sundstrom F : Strength and setting behavior of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Scand, 53:311-317, 1995. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005993
  19. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. : Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res, 76:883-894, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760041001
  20. Roulet JF, Walti C : Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass-inomer cement. J Prosthet Dent, 52:182-189, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90092-1
  21. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Gwinnett AJ, et al. : Restoration of fractured and hypoplastic incisors by the acid etch resin technique : a three-year report. J Am Dent Assoc, 95:795-803. 1977.
  22. Stanford WB, Fan PL, Wozniak WT : Effects of finishing on color and gloss of composites with different fillers(Abstr No 451). J Dent Res, 62:219, 1983.
  23. Berry LL, Berry III EA, Powers JM : Prophylaxis abrasives affect surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers(Abstract No 948). J Dent Res, 73:220, 1994.
  24. Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, et al. : In vitro toothbrush- dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater, 13:82-88, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80016-4
  25. Toumba KJ, Curzon MEJ : The prevention of dental caries using fluoride slow-releasing glass devices in children. Caries Res, 30:306-307, 1996.
  26. Forsten L : Fluoride release and uptake by glassionomer and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials, 19:503-508, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00130-0
  27. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ : A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent, 26:259-265, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00011-0
  28. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, et al. : Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent, 27:259-265, 2002.
  29. Diaz-Arnold AM, Helmes DC, Wistrom DW, et al. : Short-term Fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater, 11:96-101, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80041-7
  30. Tay WM, Braden M : Fluoride ion diffusion from polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements. Biomaterials, 9:454-456, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(88)90012-9
  31. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ : The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent, 26:591-597, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00035-3
  32. Kuramochi KI : Characteristics of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after fluoride recharging. J Dent Mater, 22:485-495, 2003.
  33. Hsu HM, Huang GF, Chang HH, et al. : A continuous flow system for assessing fluoride release/uptake of fluoride-containing restorative materials. Dental Materials, 20:740-749, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.008