Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS BONDING SYSTEMS ON THE MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED DENTIN SEALING

수종의 상아질 접착시스템이 즉시 및 지연 상아질 봉쇄의 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Ha, Jin-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Kil (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 하진희 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박정길 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2008.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of various dentin bonding systems on microtensile bond strength of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) and delayed dentin sealing (DDS). Eighteen extracted permanent molars were used in this study. The teeth for DDS group were restored with a provisional restorations, and immersed in saline solution for 1 week, and divided into 3 subgroups according to various dentin bonding adhesives; SB subgroup (3 step total-etch adhesive), SE subgroup (2 step self-etch adhesive), XE subgroup (1 step self-etch adhesive). In IDS group, the teeth were divided into 3 subgroups, and applied with bonding adhesives as in DDS group. The teeth were restored with provisional restorations, and immersed in saline solution for 1 week. Indirect composite disc was cemented with resin cement, and all specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength. The data were statistically analyzed with oneway ANOVA and Student t-test. The results were as follows: 1. The IDS group showed significantly higher ${\mu}TBS$ than DDS group in 3 step total-etch and 2 step selfetch adhesive (p < 0.05). 2. In IDS and DDS group, 3 step total-etch adhesive showed the highest ${\mu}TBS$ value, followed by 2 step self-etch, and 1 step self-etch adhesive. In IDS group, the ${\mu}TBS$ value for 1 step self-etch adhesive was significantly different from those of the other subgroups (p < 0.05), and in DDS group, there were statistical differences in all subgroup (p < 0.05). 3. Failure modes of tested dentin bonding adhesives were mostly mixed failure and only 1 step self-etch adhesive showed adhesive failure.

이 연구의 목적은 수종의 상아질 접착시스템이 즉시 및 지연 상아질 봉쇄에서 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이었다. 18개의 발거된 대구치를 사용하여 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 노출된 상아질면을 임시수복하였으며, 1주간 보관 후, 접착제에 따라 3개의 소그룹으로 나누어 도포하였다; SB 그룹 (3 단계 산 부식 접착제), SE 그룹 (2단계 자가 부식 접착제), XE 그룹 (1단계 자가 부식 접착제). 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 3개의 소그룹으로 나누어 접착제를 도포하고 임시수복 후 1주간 보관하였다. 모든 시편은 간접 복합레진과 레진 시멘트로 합착하고 미세인장결합강도를 측정하여, 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹에 비해 3단계 산 부식과 2단계 자가 부식 접착제에서 높은 미세인장결합강도를 보였다 (p < 0.05). 2. 즉시 및 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹 모두 미세인장결합강도는 3단계 산 부식, 2단계 자가 부식, 1단계 자가 부식 접착제순으로 감소하였고, 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹에서는 1단계 자가 부식 접착제와 다른 소그룹간 유의한 차이가 있었으며 (p< 0.05), 지연 상아질 봉쇄 그룹에서는 모든 소그룹간 유의한 차이가 있었다 (p < 0.05). 3. 파절 양상은 대부분 혼합성 파절을 보였으며, 1단계 자가 부식 접착제에서만 접착성 파절을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 30:747-757, 2005
  2. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 25:659-677, 1994
  3. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 9:108-118. 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  4. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:144-154, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
  5. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17:536-545, 1997
  6. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 9:115-119, 1996
  7. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 12:111-121, 1999
  8. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215-235, 2003
  9. Yesilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract 7:26-36, 2006
  10. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resininfiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185-194, 1998
  11. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 24:1-13, 2005 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.1
  12. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step selfetch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 16:414-420, 2003
  13. Park JS, Kim JS, Kim MS, Son HH, Kwon HC, Cho BH. Aging effect on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31:415-426, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.6.415
  14. Tay FR, Pashley DH, King NM, Carvalho RM, Tsai J, Lai SC, Marquezini L Jr. Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel. Oper Dent 29:309-316, 2004
  15. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent 30:259-269, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00041-6
  16. Nagaoka S, Miyazaki Y, Liu HJ, Iwamoto Y, Kitano M, Kawagoe M. Bacterial invasion into dentinal tubules of human vital and nonvital teeth. J Endod 21:70-73, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81098-8
  17. Suzuki S, Cox CF, White KC. Pulpal response after complete crown preparation, dentinal sealing, and provisional restoration. Quintessence Int 25:477-485, 1994
  18. Courson F, Bouter D, Ruse ND, Degrange M. Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil 32:296-303, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01412.x
  19. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29:55-61, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00049-X
  20. Rontani RM, Ducatti CH, Garcia-Godoy F, De Goes MF. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive inter-face in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 24:205-209, 2000
  21. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180-187, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  22. Randall RC, Wilson NH. Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 78:628-637, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780020101
  23. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1- step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 5:47-56, 2003
  24. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83-90, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
  25. Park JG, Cho KH, Cho YG. Effects of application methods of a self-etching primer adhesive system on enamel bond strength. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 33:90-97, 2008 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.2.090
  26. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555-562, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  27. Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Teshima H, Nemoto K. Hydrolytic stability of methacrylamide in acidic aqueous solution. Biomaterials 25:965-969, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00616-1
  28. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 81:472-476, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100708
  29. Son CY, Kim HC, Hur B, Park JK. Effects of one or two applications of all-in-one adhesive on microtensile bond strength to unground enamel. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31:445-451, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.6.445
  30. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237-245, 2001
  31. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:99-116, 2000

Cited by

  1. The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation on microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.134