• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제50권7호
• /
• pp.368-376
• /
• 2012

The demand for tooth-colored restorations has grown considerably during the last decade. Posterior composite restorations have risen in popularity as a result of the development of improved resin composites, bonding systems and operating techniques. A major limitation of direct composite restoration is the difficulty of controlling the polymerization shrinkage. To overcome this limitation, the indirect fabrication of a composite restoration and cementation with resin cement has been advocated. Unfortunately, the current available resin cements with indirect restorations do not always bond to dentin as strongly as dentin adhesive systems bond with direct resin composite restorations. Several procedural strategies have been proposed for indirect composite restoration. In this regard, the rationale for the indication, characteristics and clinical application is described in this paper. As a result, we will try to suggest the evidence-based guidelines for indirect composite restorations by reviewing each available indirect composite products, technical procedure and pronosis.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2001년도 추계학술대회(제116회) 및 13회 Workshop 제3회 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.595-595
• /
• 2001

As the interest for esthetic restoration is increasing, the usage of composite resin is increasing. The usage of composite resin is not limited to anterior teeth but is spreading to posterior area using direct ＆ indirect methods. Generally, dual or chemical cure resin cement has been used for setting composite or porcelain inlay restoration. However, chemical cure resin cement has limited working time and it's difficult to remove excess cement from the tooth and the restoration. The dual cured composite is also difficult to remove from the tooth surface.(omitted)

• 대한심미치과학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 1998

The improvement of esthetic dentistry has been accelerated from the development of composite resin and dentin-enamel adhesive since 1980's. The indirect composite resin restorations have more accurate proximal contact point and occlusal form than direct restoration. And the side effect of resin shrinkage is minimal because the amount of composite used in oral cavity is limited in cement space. As a results, marginal leakage, hypersensitivity, secondary caries, and discoloration are significantly diminished. The first generation laboratory composite resin used in indirect resin restoration had been widespread in 1980's and the second generation laboratory composite resins were developed in 1990's. The second generation laboratory composite resins are called Ceramic Polymer. The physical properties of Ceramic Polymer are improved because of high content of inorganic filler, and the esthetics and biocompatibility are better than that of the first generation resin. So the application range using composite resin have been broadened. The purpose of this paper is to introduce Targis & Vectris system that is classified to second generation laboratory composite and to report several cases in which the system was utilized for restoration.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제51권1호
• /
• pp.27-32
• /
• 2013

연구 재료 및 방법: 본 연구에서는 간접 레진 수복시에 상아질 접착제와 저점도 레진을 이용한 상아질 레진코팅법을 자가 접착 레진 시멘트에 적용해 전단결합강도가 증가하는지 비교하고 기존의 레진 시멘트와의 전단결합강도 차이가 어떠한지 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 목적: 사람의 발거된 건전한 구치 36개의 치관부를 삭제하고 상아질을 노출시킨 후 3개의 군으로 분류하였다. 1군과 3군은 상아질에 아무런 처리 과정을 거치지 않고 2군만 Clearfil SE bond와 Metafil Flo를 사용해 상아질 레진코팅법을 시행하였다. 24시간의 임시수복 기간을 둔 후 Tescera를 이용하여 제작한 레진 인레이 블록을 1군과 2군에는 Unicem, 3군에는 Panavia F를 사용해 접착하였다. 그 후 증류수에 48시간 동안 보관한 후 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정된 전단결합강도는 one-way ANOVA를 이용하여 비교 분석하였으며 유의한 차이가 있는 경우 Tukey method를 이용하여 multiple comparison를 시행하였다. 결과:상아질에 레진코팅법을 시행한 경우의 Unicem의 결합강도가 상아질에 아무런 처리를 하지 않은 대조군의 결합강도보다 높게 나타났고(P<.0001), 레진코팅을 하지 않고 Panavia F로 접착한 실험군의 결합강도보다 높게 나타났다(P<.0001). 결론: 상아질 레진코팅법은 자가 접착 레진 시멘트의 접착 강도를 증가시켰다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.284-289
• /
• 2002

Background : The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the direct and indirect composite restorations which had been placed for 1 year Methods : The composite restorations which had been placed between 1999. Mar and 1999, Dec was evaluated after 1 year For direct restorations. Spectrum (Dentsply, USA) and Z100 (3M, USA) were used in the anterior teeth and Surefil (Dentsply, USA) were used. For class V restorations of anterior and posterior teeth. Spectrum was used. For indirect restorations, Targis/Vectris system (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) was used 2 examiners evaluated marginal quality, proximal contact. discoloration, presence of 2$^{nd}$ caries, loss of filling and hypersensitivity of restorations. The restorations was clinically evaluated by modified methods based on USPHS. Results : 60 teeth were evaluated. 59 were clinically acceptable and 1 restoration which was placed in class v cavity in the posterior tooth was fallen out. In most cases, the restorations were clinically accept-able. For restorations which had been directly placed in the class II cavities, loose proximal contact was indicated as the main complaints. Conclusions : Most of Anterior and posterior restorations which bad been directly or indirectly placed for 1 year were clinically acceptable. For posterior teeth, loose proximal contact was indicated as the main problem in the directly placed Class II restorations. Long term clinical study is needed.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2001년도 추계학술대회(제116회) 및 13회 Workshop 제3회 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.593-593
• /
• 2001

Esthetic restoration techniques can be categorized into "Direct techniques" consist only of intraoral procedures and "Indirect techniques" include intraoral as well as extraoral laboratory steps. Those made extraorally exhibit generally enhanced esthetic potential and anatomy and better hardness and wear resistance, indirect esthetic restorations numerously applied in contemporary dentistry. Indirect restorative materials can be divided into two categories; composite resin-based materials and ceramic-based materials. These materials shows various were resistance, modulus of elasticity, repair postenital, chemical stability, and different laboratory procedures. In this session, benefit of indirect techinques, case selection of this kind of restorations, and material characteristics and fabrication produre of those materials will ber reviewed; Targis, Sculpture, Belleglass, and Post-curing of restorative composite resins in resin-based materials; Dicor, Empress, Cerec, Celay, and conventional firing porcelain in ceramic based materials.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 여러 레진 시멘트의 film thickness에 따른 상아질과 간접 레진 수복물 간의 미세인장 결합 강도를 측정하고, 각 레진 시멘트의 중합 수축 및 굴곡 강도, 탄성 계수를 비교 분석하며, 접착 계면 및 파단면의 주사전자 현미경 관찰을 통하여 레진 시멘트의 film thickness가 레진 간접 수복물의 접착 효율에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 시행하였다. 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트인 Variolink II와 Duo-Link, 접착형 레진 시멘트인 Panavia F와 Rely X Unicem의 4가지 레진 시멘트를 사용하였고, 각각의 시멘트를 film thickness에 따라 < $50\;{\mu}m$ (control)의 대조군과 $50\;{\mu}m$ (T50), $100\;{\mu}m$ (T100), $150\;{\mu}m$ (T150)의 실험군으로 나누어 총 16개의 군으로 분류하였다. 데이터는 ANOVA와 Duncan's multiple comparison test (p < 0.05)를 이용하여 통계 분석하였으며 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다; 1. Variolink Ⅱ는 모든 film thickness에서 접착형 레진 시멘트보다 높은 결합 강도를 나타냈지만(p < 0.05), Duo-Link는 대조군을 제외하고는 통계학적 유의차가 없었다(p > 0.05). 2. Film thickness가 증가할수록 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트의 결합 강도는 유의성 있게 감소(p < 0.05)하는 경향을 보인 반면, 접착형 레진 시멘트는 통계학적 유의차가 없었다(p > 0.05). 3. Panavia F는 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 낮은 중합 수축량을 나타냈다(p <0.05). 4. 굴곡 강도와 탄성 계수는 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트가 접착형 레진 시멘트보다 유의성 있게 높게 나타났다(p < 0.05). 5. FE-SEM 관찰 결과 결합 강도가 높은 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트는 균일한 접착층과 잘 발달된 resin tag 소견을 보였으나, 접착형 레진 시멘트는 불분명한 접착층과 resin tag 소견을 나타냈다. 파단면 관찰에서 복합 레진형 레진 시멘트는 혼합형 파괴 양상을 나타냈으나 접착형 레진 시멘트는 접착성 파괴 양상을 나타냈다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.334-346
• /
• 1997

Incidence of using esthetic composite resin in the posterior area is increasing but there were lots of inconsistent reports about their microleakage and marginal adaptation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences of microleakage and marginal adaptation according to restorative techniques. 30 cavities with enamel gingival margin were prepared and restored with 3 types of composite resin [Z-100($Scotchbond^{TM}$ MP), AELITEFIL ($Onestep^{TM}$), Her culite XRV(Fuji BOND LC)] in direct technique and another 30 cavities were restored with preformed CR inlays and 3 different modern resin and resin-modified GI cements (Superbond C&B, Choice, Fuji Duet). Samples were chemically stressed in 75% ethanol for 24 hours and were thermocycled (5-$55^{\circ}C$(500 times. The degree of microleakage through proximal and gingival margins was examined by 1 % MB dye and the degree of marginal adaptation by examining the margins via SEM. The following results were obtained ; 1. In direct groups, Herculite XRV [Fuji BOND LC, 35.13 (15.50) %] group showed statistically different, less microleakage than Z-100 [$Scotchbond^{TM}$ MP, 72.91 (16.91 %] group and AELITEFIL [One-step, 93.73 (13.66) %] group (p<0.05). 2. In indirect groups, the degree of microleakage in Mean(S.D.) were: Super bond C & B [39.00 (24.35) %], Choice [57.19 (33.80) %], Fuji Duet [58.22 (40.36) %]. But there was no significant difference. 3. There was no significant difference between resin cement and resin-modified GI cement. 4. There were gaps at the interface with the tooth structure, but no gap was seen at the interface with restoration in all specimens. 5. In direct groups, Herculite XRV(Fuji BOND LC) group made little gap compared with other groups, but 40-$50{\mu}m$ thickness of bonding agent, Fuji BOND LC, looked like a cement used in indirect technique. 6. All indirect groups showed a variety of cement thickness, from less than $20{\mu}m$ to over $100{\mu}m$ and that dimension of buccal/lingual margin was less than that of gingival margin.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.38.1-38.9
• /
• 2018

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2007년도 Autumn Scientific Meeting(the 128th) of Korean Academy of Comservative Dentistry
• /
• pp.635-635
• /
• 2007