DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison on the Capability of Four Predatory Mites to Prey on the Eggs of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

포식성 이리응애 4종의 담배가루이 알 포식능력 비교 평가

  • Kim, Hwang-Yong (Applied Entomoloy Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hwi (Applied Entomoloy Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Hwan (Applied Entomoloy Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Heon (Applied Entomoloy Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김황용 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 이용휘 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 김정환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 김용헌 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과)
  • Published : 2008.12.30

Abstract

On the leaf disc of fruit vegetables (cucumber, sweet pepper, tomato, egg plant, oriental melon), it has been evaluated that the capability of four predatory mites (Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot, Neoseiulus barkeri (Hughes), N. cucumeris (Oudemans), N. californicus (McGregor)) to prey on the eggs of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and to lay own eggs. The most aggressive mite was A. swirskii which had consumed about $9{\sim}12$ eggs in a day. The quantity of eggs consumed by N. barkeri, N. cucumeris and N. californicus was about $6{\sim}9,\;4{\sim}6$ and $1{\sim}4$, respectively. The most productive mite was also A. swirskii which had laid about $1.2{\sim}1.9$ eggs in a day. The others could not lay more than 0.5 eggs in a day.

시설과채류(오이, 착색단고추, 토마토, 가지, 참외)의 잎 절편에서 지중해이리응애, 나팔이리응애, 오이이리응애, 사막이리응애를 대상으로 담배가루이 알에 대한 포식능력과 산란능력을 비교 평가하였다. 지중해이리응애의 일평균 담배가루이 알 포식량이 $9{\sim}12$개로 가장 많았으며, 나팔이리응애, 오이이리응애, 사막이리응애가 각각 $6{\sim}9$개, $4{\sim}6$개, $1{\sim}4$개로 뒤를 이었다. 일평균 산란수도 지중해이리응애가 $1.2{\sim}1.9$개로 가장 많았으며, 다른 포식응애들은 0.5개를 넘지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Byrne, D.N. 1999. Migration and dispersal by the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Agri. Forest Meteorol. 97: 309-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00074-X
  2. Calvo, J., P. Fernández, K. Bolckmans and J.E. Belda. 2006. Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a biological control agent of the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) in protected sweet pepper crops in Southern Spain. Integrated Control in Protected Crops, Mediterranean Climate IOBC/wprs Bulletin 29(4): 73-78
  3. Canlas, L.J., H. Amano, N. Ochiai and M. Takeda. 2006. Biology and predation of the Japanese strain of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 11: 141-157 https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.11.2.2
  4. Horowitz, A.R., K. Gorman, G. Ross and I. Denholm. 2003. Inheritance of pyriproxyfen resistance in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Q biotype). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 54: 177-186 https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.10115
  5. Jones, D. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109: 197-221
  6. Lee, M., S. Kang, S. Lee, H.-S. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, G.-S. Lee, W.-Y. Kim, S.-W. Lee, S.-G. Kim and K.-B. Uhm. 2005. Occurrence of the B- and Q-biotypes of Bemisia tabaci in Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 44(3): 169-175. in Korean with English abstract
  7. McMurtry, J.A. and B.A. Croft. 1997. Life-style of phytoseiid mites and their role in biological control. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291-321 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.291
  8. Messelink, G.J., S.E.F. van Steenpaal and P.M.J. Ramakers. 2006. Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. Biocontrol 51: 753-768 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9013-9
  9. Nombela, G., F. Beitia and M. Muñiz. 2001. A differential interaction study of Bemisia tabaci Q-biotype on commercial tomato varieties with and without the Mi resistance gene, and comparative host responses with the B-biotype. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 98: 339-344 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018911114463
  10. Nomikou, M., A. Janssen, R. Schraag and M.W. Sabelis. 2001. Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25: 271- 291 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017976725685
  11. Nomikou, M., A. Janssen, R. Schraag and M.W. Sabelis, 2002. Phytoseiid predators suppress populations of Bemisia tabaci on cucumber plants with alternative food. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 27: 57-68 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021559421344
  12. Nomikou, M., A. Janssen and M.W. Sabelis. 2003. Phytoseiid predator of whitefly feeds on plant tissue. Experimental and Applied Acarology 31: 27-36 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APPA.0000005150.33813.04
  13. Nomikou, M. 2003. Combating whiteflies: Predatory mites as a novel weapon. Ph. D. Thesis, Section Population Biology, University of Amsterdam. 156pp
  14. Swirski, E., S. Amitai and N. Dorzia. 1970. Laboratory studies on the feeding habits, postembryonic survival and oviposition of the predaceous mites Amblyseius chilensis Dosse and Amblyseius hibisci Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Entomophaga 15: 93-106 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371627

Cited by

  1. Biological Control of Insect Pests with Arthropod Natural Enemies on Greenhouse Sweet Pepper in Winter Cropping System vol.49, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.385
  2. Change of population density of tobacco whitefly (Bemisia tabaci, Aleyrodidae, Hemiptera) by RNAi vol.42, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.1.007
  3. Occurrence of Sweet-potato Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Its Response to Insecticide in Gyeonggi Area vol.51, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.09.0.051
  4. Gene expression in plant according to RNAi treatment of the tobacco whitefly vol.42, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.2.081
  5. A Report on Mixed Occurrence of Tobacco Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) Biotype B and Q in Oriental Melon Farms in Kyungpook Province, Korea vol.53, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2014.09.0.038