DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE MANAGEMENT OF A COMPLEX IMPLANT CASE USING CAD-CAM TECHNOLOGY: A CLINICAL REPORT

  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Dentistry School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: The application of computer-aided technology to implant dentistry has created new opportunities for treatment planning, surgery and prosthodontic treatment, but the correct selection and combination of available methods may be challenging in times. Hence, the purpose of this case report is to present a combination of several computer-aided tools as approaches to manage complicated implant case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 47 year-old female patient with severe dental anxiety, high expectations, financial restrictions and poor compliance presented for a fixed rehabilitation. A CT scan with a radiographic template obtained with software (SimPlant, Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) was used for treatment planning. The surgical plan was created and converted into a stereolithographic model of the maxilla with bone-supported surgical templates (SurgiGuide, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), that allowed for the precise placement of 7 implants in a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla. After successful osseointegration, an accurate scan model served as the basis for the fabrication of a one-piece milled titanium framework using the Procera (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) technology. The final rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla was rendered in the form of a screw-retained maxillary metal-reinforced resin-based complete prosthesis. RESULTS: Despite challenging circumstances, 7 implants could be placed without bone augmentation in a severely resorbed maxilla using the SimPlant software for pre-implant analysis and the SurgiGuide-system as the surgical template. The patient was successfully restored with a fixed full arch restoration, utilizing the Procera system for the fabrication of a milled titanium framework.

Keywords

References

  1. McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH, Arbree NS. Classification system for partial edentulism. J Prosthodont 2002;11:181-93 https://doi.org/10.1053/jpro.2002.126094
  2. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  3. Jemt T, Back T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:209-15
  4. Shor A, Goto Y, Schuler RF. Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004;16:729-36
  5. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-6
  6. Tan KB, Rubenstein JE, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA. Threedimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:346-63
  7. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5
  8. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200
  9. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of computer numeric control-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:199-209 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00036.x
  10. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Wennerberg A, Berggren C, Brycke M. Screw preloads and measurements of surface roughness in screw joints: an in vitro study on implant frameworks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:141-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00058.x